Lifetime Income Providers Tout Ongoing Innovation

Retirement plan participants are slowly but surely gaining better access to lifetime income products, according to new reporting from the Insured Retirement Institute. 

The Insured Retirement Institute (IRI) released its annual “State of the Insured Retirement Industry” report this week, detailing how ongoing product innovation among insurance providers and asset managers is improving choice for investors hoping to convert assets into guaranteed income streams.

The preponderance of new products is very much a positive development given anticipated demand for lifetime income options in the years ahead, IRI says, especially options hardwired directly into employer sponsored defined contribution (DC) plans. This has been a particular area of strong provider focus, IRI finds, but regulatory challenges remain and plan sponsors are still somewhat wary of the amount of fiduciary liability that might come along with in-plan lifetime income.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Heading into 2016, a vast majority of individuals investing in the DC system say they are open to the idea of in-plan lifetime income options, but only about one in five plan sponsors feel their company would be interested in offering these features. IRI notes that ongoing product development is creating “a wide array of consumer choice regarding lifetime income products, allowing advisers to create retirement plans that better meet the needs of their clients,” both participants and sponsors. (Also see “Income Planning Requires Annuity Know-How.”)

IRI finds product providers delivered a variety of new lifetime income approaches during 2015, with strongest development in the categories of investment-oriented variable annuities (IOVAs), fixed indexed annuities (FIAs), and deferred income annuities (DIAs) that meet qualifying longevity annuity contract (QLAC) criteria.

NEXT: The demographic trends are clear

IRI President and CEO Cathy Weatherford says the demographic case for lifetime income, whether inside or outside the plan, “has never been more pronounced.” Put simply, there is a huge cohort of Americans who control substantial wealth who are all closing in on retirement and looking for ways to control their spending and insure against longevity risk.

“These Americans will live longer in retirement than any generation before, and will be more responsible for their financial security,” Weatherford says. “This is a tremendous opportunity for the retirement income industry, and we are seeing market participants expand and fill out their product shelves to meet this growing need.”

IRI says annuity providers are encouraged by the current market forces and most feel “well-positioned headed into 2016, with strong liquidity and balance sheet fundamentals.”

“In addition to healthy financials, the expectation that interest rates may soon begin to rise should ease macroeconomic headwinds bearing on the lifetime income market,” the report explains. If interest rates reach or exceed 3% by the end of 2016—which is admittedly on the higher end of economists’ current predictions—IRI says income-oriented annuity sales will likely increase significantly.

From a public policy perspective, IRI cautions that the Department of Labor’s forthcoming final fiduciary rule is a “wildcard that all eyes across the industry will be watching.” IRI believes the final form of the rule will determine the level of disruption to the lifetime income industry and the consumers it serves.

NEXT: Other key findings 

While lifetime income product providers are optimistic heading into 2016, the investors they hope to service are feeling anything but. A rather dismal 27% of Baby Boomers are confident their savings will last throughout retirement, for example. While this group represents “a large pool of consumers who can benefit from lifetime income strategies,” it’s less clear that they will have enough assets on average to shape a livable guaranteed retirement income plan.

Looking to particular product lines, IRI finds sales of investment-oriented variable annuities have increased 94% during the past five years, and they now make up 16% of total variable annuity sales. Fixed income annuities also are “experiencing strong sales as a fixed-income substitute and on the attractiveness of optional guaranteed lifetime income benefits.” Sales of FIAs have increased 50% since 2011, IRI explains, further predicting sales of FIAs “should continue to experience growth with the introduction of new products, including those that offer ‘uncapped’ growth on the portion of the contract participating in the index.”

Additional findings show the number of companies offering deferred income annuities has doubled since 2012. As of mid-year 2015, sales of DIAs were tracking near 2014 sales of $2.6 billion. As recently as 2012, sales of DIAs were only $1 billion, IRI says.

Perhaps most impressive: “While only one QLAC product was available at this time in 2014, there are now 11 companies offering QLAC products that are available for use in either [individual retirement accounts] or workplace retirement plans.”

The full report is available for download here.

What Office Workers Don’t Like Doing

Mail and assorted monotonous tasks get a resounding thumbs down in survey of most-hated office tasks.

Office mail is just the worst, employees say. 

A national survey of 1,000 employees revealed that for those who work in their company’s front office, the most despised administrative task is preparing and sending office mail, according to Postalocity.com, an online mailing service.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Sending invoices was specifically cited as the least favorite type of mail for half the group. Managing email came in second. The survey allowed participants to choose their own response, and the responses covered the spectrum of daily workplace frustration.

Other responses included “dealing with idiots,” “tedious, monotonous work,” “disciplinary actions” and “yelling.” Almost half (43%) “hate” sending bulk mail, and associated tasks and troubles as having to lick envelopes; printer jams; running out of supplies like paper, ink and envelopes; misaligned printing on labels; getting back undeliverable mail; and printing addresses upside down.

Front-office workers rated their least-favorite tasks:

  1. Office mailings
  2. Managing email
  3. Filing
  4. Meetings
  5. Dealing with people
  6. Answering the phone
  7. Planning lunch
  8. Doing payroll
  9. Cleaning
  10. In general, working

«