Women Are Better 401(k) Savers Than Men

But men’s average account balances are more than 50% larger.

Vanguard examined women’s and men’s 401(k) savings behavior and found that women are better savers but trail men in outcomes.

Women are 14% more likely than men to participate in their workplace savings plan and save at higher rates; women earning less than $100,000 save 20% more than their male counterparts, and across all income levels, women save at rates that are 7% to 16% higher than men’s.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

In plans that automatically enroll participants, men and women participate at the same rate. This suggests that men benefit from auto features, Vanguard says. However, lower-wage earners see the largest improvements from auto enrollment, and 60% more women fall into the lower-income bands than men.

“Autopilot features are undoubtedly the great equalizer, but we’re not seeing a rapid convergence of men’s and women’s participation and savings rates,” says Jean Young, senior research analyst at the Vanguard Center for Retirement Research. “Women absolutely demonstrate a conscious inclination towards savings and, even with a higher proportion of women earning lower wages, the tailwind of auto enroll has maintained that savings lead.”

The only category in which men outsaved women was in auto enrollment plans, with men deferring at rates 5% higher than women. Vanguard also found that higher-income participants tend to override default features. Vanguard attributed this to the fact that men’s average wages are 25% higher than women’s and their median wages are 33% higher. And despite women’s higher savings rates in non-auto enrollment plans, the fact that men earn so much more than women affects their balances, Vanguard says.

NEXT: Investments held

Vanguard found that contrary to widely held beliefs that women are far more risk-averse than men, men and women tend to invest in the same level of equities. That said, women are less likely to invest in company stock and more likely to gravitate to balanced investment allocations.

As of year-end 2014, 42% of women held a single target-date fund and, on average, held 52% of their account balances in target date funds. In aggregate, 17% more women than men owned a single target-date fund. Women also traded about one-third less frequently than men, with only 7% of female participants trading in 2014.

Over the past five years, men earned an average of 10.9%, compared to 10.6% for women. Nonetheless, men’s average and median account balances are more than 50% higher than women’s.

“With persistent and undue criticism of the 401(k) system, it is important to note that the data reflects current labor market realities, and defined contribution plans are not driving this gender retirement savings gap,” Young says. “More important, however, is the lingering suboptimal savings rates on the part of all participants—regardless of gender.” Young notes that Vanguard recommends saving 12% to 15% of one’s salary each year, including employer contributions.

Q3 Market Drop Socks It to Institutional Investors

However, Corporate ERISA plans were the relative best performer among plan types last quarter.

In the third quarter, institutional asset owners lost 4.6% at the median, according to Northern Trust Universe data.

Since 1998, the third quarter has averaged a -0.25% return. This year’s third-quarter return ranks in the bottom quartile all-time of third-quarter returns, as measured by Northern Trust Universe data.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Corporate Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) plans were the relative best performer among plan types last quarter, losing 3.9% at the median, while Foundations & Endowments lost 4.7% and Public Funds lost 4.9%. Corporate ERISA plans returned to having the highest relative return after being the worst-returning plan type in the second quarter. All plan types had a median decline of at least two percentage points compared with the prior quarter.

“Having the smallest exposure to equities was a key factor behind the relative outperformance of corporate ERISA plans,” says Bill Frieske, senior investment performance consultant, Northern Trust Investment Risk & Analytical Services. “Another factor helping corporate ERISA plans was the longer duration of their fixed income programs. Corporate pension plans generally have been lengthening the duration of their fixed income programs while at the same time adding dollars to the allocation relative to Public Funds and Foundations & Endowments. The third quarter saw interest rates decline, pushing up returns for long duration bonds.”   

NEXT: The better performing investments

Private equity, real estate and fixed income programs all generated positive results in the third quarter, while U.S. equity and international equity were significantly negative, Northern Trust reports. Private equity was the best returning asset class in the third quarter with the median private equity program up 3%. Real estate was up about 2.3%, and the median bond program was up only 0.4%. International equity was down more than 10%, and the median U.S. equity program was down 7.6%.

Northern Trust’s findings generally showed Corporate ERISA plan returns were helped by a large allocation to U.S. fixed income (39% at the median), in addition to private equity (7.5% at the median). Public Fund returns were dampened by a large exposure to U.S. equity (31.2% at the median) and international equity (21% at the median). Foundation & Endowment plan returns were supported by a large allocation towards private equity (25%), but negatively impacted by exposure to domestic equity (19.2%) and international equity (11.2%).

Looking at asset allocation in the third quarter, corporate pension plans continued to move on a path of de-risking by moving from equity to fixed income investments. Public Funds continued to move money into private equity and international equity. The median allocation to private equity for Public Funds went from 1.6% last December to 5.8% currently. Foundations & Endowments reduced their allocation to fixed income from 16% to 11% while continuing to allocate to hedge funds and private equity.

The Northern Trust Universe tracks the performance of about 300 large U.S. institutional investment plans, with a combined asset value of approximately $899 billion, which subscribe to performance measurement services as part of Northern Trust’s asset servicing offerings.

«