DOL Publishes Field Assistance Bulletin Regarding Fiduciary Rule Delay

The Department of Labor is seeking to offer assurance to advisers that it does not intend to enforce the fiduciary rule slated for implementation April 10, even if it fails to formally overturn the rulemaking by then. 

Retirement plan advisers and services providers will likely breathe a little easier after reading a new field assistance bulletin published by the Department of Labor (DOL).

The document outlines a “temporary enforcement policy” related to the DOL’s recent proposal to extend for 60 days the applicability date of the final rule defining who is a fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Erin Sweeney, member at Miller and Chevalier, tells PLANADVISER she views the bulletin as “an effort to quell potential confusion regarding the potential delayed applicability of the fiduciary rule.”

“The Department of Labor has made clear that if a delay is implemented after the original applicability date of April 10, 2017, the DOL will not conduct enforcement efforts between April 10, 2017 and the date the delay is implemented,” Sweeney explains. “The DOL has also clarified that if a delay is not implemented, that advisers and financial institutions will have a ‘reasonable period’ following the determination that a delay will not be implemented to comply with the rule.”

 A team of ERISA attorneys from Drinker Biddle and Reath offer their take here, reaching similar conclusions about what the new bulletin means for advisers and providers.

“The FAB recognizes the industry’s concerns about having to comply with the rule during a temporary gap period,” they write, “as well as the possibility that it could find out only immediately prior to April 10 that no delay would occur. The FAB assures advisers and financial institutions that they will not face possible DOL enforcement merely because they elect to wait and see what happens. The FAB makes clear that the DOL still intends to issue a final delay regulation before April 10, but it provides at least some breathing room for the industry in light of the uncertainty.”

Specifically, according to the Drinker Biddle attorneys, the bulletin “provides that the DOL will not take enforcement action for non-compliance with the fiduciary rule, including its related exemptions, in two cases.” The first of these cases would be “if the DOL decides to delay the fiduciary rule but the delaying regulation is not finalized until after April 10.” In this case, the rulemaking “would trigger fiduciary status and prohibited transactions for many advisers and financial institutions that waited for the DOL to complete the regulatory process. During the gap period (April 10 until the delay is finalized), the FAB states that DOL will not take enforcement action related to the Rule.”

Second, should there ultimately be no delay, the attorneys explain advisers and financial institutions “would have a ‘reasonable period’ after that decision is announced to begin complying with the rule. Further, the FAB states that the ‘Transition Period’ disclosures required under the Best Interest Contract Exemption (BICE) and the DOL’s exemption for principal transactions could be provided during the 30-day ‘cure period’ that these two exemptions recognize where disclosures are inadvertently omitted. In fact, it appears that the DOL is hoping that advisers and financial institutions relying on BICE (or the principal transaction exemption) will hold off on providing retirement investors with Transition Period disclosures until after the delay (if any) is finalized.”

QDIA Development and Income Flexibility Key Trends in 2017

Product development and participant demands may open a wider door for retirement income solutions in the DC space, according to new research by Cerulli Associates.

The evolution of qualified default investment alternative (QDIA) structures, and the expanding flexibility for retirement income solutions are two key trends in the defined contribution (DC) space for 2017, according to the latest findings by global research and consulting firm Cerulli Associates. 

The firm found that slightly less than half of DC plan sponsors currently have a retirement income option, with target-date funds (TDF) and managed accounts being the primary offerings. The figure is slightly higher for larger plans with greater than $500 million in assets. Overall, less than one-fifth of plan sponsors cited a guaranteed annuity product.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

But Cerulli observes that product development in the DC space may widen the door for retirement income products. The firm points to a “hybrid” QDIA recently rolled out by Great-West Investments, an affiliate of Empower Retirement.

The Dynamic Retirement Manager automatically switches a participant’s assets from a TDF to a managed account at an age selected by the plan sponsor. The new managed account would include both retirement income allocations and investment options not already on the core menu. Cerulli believes managed accounts are generally better for older investors as they typically have larger balances, justifying a need for a greater degree of personalized advice. Moreover, they also tend to have a greater grasp of retirement needs the closer they are to it. 

Although it is designed for plans of all sizes, Great-West Investments reports that it already has two large plan sponsors on board for the hybrid product.

Dynamic Retirement Manager encompasses annuities. If a plan makes a retirement income product available, the managed account will recommend to it

The firm finds that nearly half (47%) of all mega plan sponsors prefer to have terminated or separated employees leave their assets in the plan and draw income from their 401(k). Among all plan sizes, the preference for this is at 37%.

Based on Cerulli’s research, 90% of 401(k) plans currently are not designed in a way that would allow investors to make systematic or ad hoc withdrawals – a benefit that older participants ages 60 and older value the most in a retirement income plan. Studies also show older generations are eager for retirement income, but may require better understanding of these products.

Cerulli’s report U.S. Defined Contribution Trends for 2017 notes, “plan sponsors’ belief that participants belong in plan and a potential lack of other options may conspire to force an evolution of 401(k) plans overall. While it is not a quick fix, plan sponsors and consultants can work together to change and amend plan documents such that 401(k) plans more broadly offer the retirement income flexibility that participants need.”

The firm also noted two recent developments by TIAA. One of its products periodically drives assets to a fixed annuity, with the intent of creating a specific level of guaranteed income. TIAA reports that about 10 non-profit organizations use this option. Another product starts allocating to Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) once a participant reaches a certain income replacement target such as 80%. TIAA received a letter from the Department of Labor (DOL) indicating both of these products could be considered prudent QDIAs. However, Cerulli notes the DOL drew the line at granting safe harbor for selection of these products in a qualified plan.

“Asset managers should closely watch product development in QDIA trends in the DC market,” explains Bing Waldert, managing director at Cerulli. “These products represent an opportunity for asset managers with capabilities in the multi-asset-class space. Multi-asset-class solutions are one of the key ways in which asset managers are redistributing their intellectual capital to compete against the continuing rise of passive products. This may present an opportunity for insurers and asset managers to work together to introduce guarantees into next-generation products. “

The firm concludes, “Cerulli believes the retirement income space in DC plans is ripe for product development, particularly for insurance companies that continue to experience pressure on their legacy accumulation-oriented annuity business.”

The U.S. Defined Contribution Trends for 2017: QDIA Product Development and the Evolution of Retirement Income Solutions report, part of The Cerulli Edge―U.S. Retirement Edition, 1Q 2017 Issue.

«