Changes DB Plan Sponsor Clients Would See with Budget Bill

The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 includes some good news about funding calculations and mortality tables, but there is some bad news in it too.

Many retirement plan adviser clients will be impacted by provisions of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (H.R. 1314), but especially sponsors of defined benefit (DB) retirement plans.

The bill provides that the single-employer fixed Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) premium would be raised to $68 for 2017, $73 for 2018, and $78 for 2019, and then re-indexed for inflation. The variable rate premium would continue to be indexed for inflation, but would be increased by an additional $2 in 2017, and additional $3 in 2018, and an additional $3 in 2019.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Under current law, the due date for premiums is generally the 15th day of the tenth full calendar month of the premium payment year. The budget bill would bump that due date up to the 15th day of the ninth calendar month beginning on or after the first day of the premium payment year.

Under current law, private-sector DB plans generally must use mortality tables prescribed by the Treasury for purposes of calculating pension liabilities. However, plan sponsors may apply to use a separate mortality table if the table they want to use reflects the actual experience of the plan and projected trends, and if there are a sufficient number of plan participants and the plan has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to have credible information to back that up.

The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 would make it easier for DB plan sponsors to get approval to use mortality tables other than that prescribed by the Treasury. The determination of whether the plan has credible information would be made in accordance with established actuarial credibility theory, and a plan may use tables that are adjusted from the Treasury tables if the adjustments are based on a plan’s experience.

NEXT: Funding relief not all good news

DB plans were given relief for funding calculations by the Highway and Transportation Funding Act of 2014 (HATFA). HATFA extended relief provided in the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)—passed in 2012—which allowed defined benefit plans to discount future benefit payments to a present value using a 25-year average of bond rates rather than a two-year average. MAP-21 created a “corridor” of rates on either side of a 25-year average that were permissible for discounting purposes. If the two-year average falls outside this corridor, a company can use the 25-year average that is closest to the two-year average in the corridor. HATFA reset the corridor’s boundaries.

The budget bill would keep the corridor on interest rates at 10% through 2019, then increase it by 5% through 2023, and set it at 30% beyond that. This provision would generally be effective for plan years beginning after December 31.

While this provides relief to employers when calculating liabilities and determining required contributions to their pension plans, the bill summary notes that DB plan sponsors that choose to take advantage would have more taxable income because the contributions they elect to defer are tax-deductible when contributed. The provision is also estimated to result in increased PBGC premiums because sponsors that take advantage of the relief would have a larger base for purposes of computing the variable rate premium on underfunding.

Millennial Retirement Agenda: Saving, Not Planning

Retirement planning is harder than dieting; retirement may hinge on winning the lottery; or can Oprah be my adviser?

There’s a difference between saving and planning for retirement, and Millennials don’t know it. Most Millennials are saving for retirement, but that doesn’t mean they’re on track to enjoy one that’s financially secure, according to a national study recently issued by the Insured Retirement Institute (IRI) and the Center for Generational Kinetics.

Millennials—Americans ages 20 to 37—are falling short when it comes to planning for retirement, and this could have big implications for their future financial security.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

While 68% of Millennials said they are saving for retirement, only 29% are actively planning for retirement, the report found. At the same time, many seem to be developing unrealistic expectations about life in retirement. Most Millennials seriously underestimate how much money they will need for their retirement years. Seven in 10 said they will spend less than $36,000 per year in retirement. That’s 30% less than the current national average of $46,757 for people ages 65 to 74.

“This study debunks the myth that Millennials are not thinking about retirement,” says Jason Dorsey, Millennial expert and chief strategy officer of Center for Generational Kinetics. Millennials are in fact aware of retirement, but their approach to planning varies wildly from that of previous generations—and, Dorsey says, “It’s not very realistic.”

More than one-quarter of Millennial respondents said they are counting on winning the lottery or receiving monetary gifts to fund their retirement years. More than half (56%) believe they will not be able to retire when they want to, and more than one-quarter (28%) think full retirement is impossible. The majority of Millennials said planning for retirement is more difficult than sticking to a diet.

NEXT: Would Millennials prefer Warren Buffett or Oprah Winfrey as an adviser?

When it comes to working with a financial professional, 62% of Millennials would like an adviser to walk them through every step of the retirement planning process, and 87% said it is important that an adviser be willing to meet them in person. Only 19% said they are likely to use a robo-adviser.

About half of Millennials (48%) would pick Warren Buffett to be their financial adviser, and 32% would choose Oprah Winfrey. Baby Boomers, on the other hand, are wildly enthusiastic about Buffett (77%) and less keen on Winfrey (15%).

“These sobering statistics seem to be indicative of a generation that is struggling to manage competing financial demands,” says Cathy Weatherford, president and chief executive of IRI. “Many Millennials are still juggling student loans and other debts, and so planning for retirement is not their top financial priority yet.” But as retirement requires decades of attention, Weatherford emphasizes that Millennials need special help getting started, with specific savings goals and financial plans.

IRI and CGK surveyed 1,110 Americans ages 18 to 65, with a 10% oversample of Millennials, ages 20 to 37 in August. The study can be downloaded from IRI’s website.

«