Compliance June 20, 2013

Bill Puts SEC at Head of Fiduciary Definition Line

The House Committee on Financial Services passed a bill Wednesday that would collar expected rulemaking from the Department of Labor (DOL) to amend the fiduciary definition.
Reported by

The Retail Investor Protection Act (H.R. 2374) was introduced by Rep. Ann Wagner (R-Missouri) and passed 44-13. It addresses the permissive rulemaking authority provided to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the Dodd-Frank Act regarding standards of care applicable to broker/dealers and investment advisers.

The bill, in effect, draws a line and puts the SEC at the head of it, allowing the commission to propose its definition of fiduciary, and stopping the DOL from any rulemaking on a fiduciary definition under ERISA until 60 days after the SEC’s definition. Dodd-Frank authorizes the SEC to set rules on fiduciary standards of conduct, extending them to broker/dealers.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The DOL’s efforts to amend the definition of fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) could conflict with the SEC’s permissive mandate under section XIX of Dodd-Frank, according to Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas), chairman of the Financial Services Committee.  “Ultimately, we believe this could hurt moderate-income Americans as they attempt to access financial advice, constrain their investment advices, and ultimately cost them money,” Hensarling said at the full committee’s markup.

A number of industry groups weighed in on the subject early this month. (See “Groups Urge SEC to Uphold Fiduciary Standard.”) Rep. Maxine Waters (D-California) tried unsuccessfully to have a bill she proposed earlier attached to the bill as an amendment. The bill would have assessed user fees to fund exams for advisers. (See “Rep. Waters Introduces Bill to Boost Exams.”)

Data & Research June 20, 2013

NIRS: The Retirement Crisis Is Worse Than We Think

A new analysis shows 38.3 million working-age households (45%) do not have any retirement account assets.
Reported by

During a webinar, Diane Oakley, executive director of the National Institute on Retirement Security (NIRS), said its previous research shows 85% of individuals are concerned about retirement, of which 55% are very concerned. “Individuals want to know ‘How am I doing?’,” she said.  

So, NIRS wanted to look at U.S. households and see if Americans are on track for retirement security. It did an analysis of the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) for 2010 to get savings rates, retirement plan participation, retirement account balances, and other information, and also used a universe of working-age households with head of households between ages 25 and 64. In addition, NIRS looked at a “near retirement” subset ages 55 to 64.  

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

The analysis found the estimated retirement savings gap for working-age households with at least one earner ranges from $14 trillion based on retirement account balances, down to $6.8 trillion based on net worth.  

Among near-retirement households, $12,000 is the median balance of combined savings in defined contribution (DC) plans and individual retirement accounts (IRAs). One-third have nothing saved, and another one-third saved less than 100% of their current income. However, the near-retirement subset is the last age cohort to have more coverage by defined benefit (DB) plans than DC plans.

Oakley noted that near the beginning of 2000, the retirement landscape reached a high of 61.9% of employees having access to an employer-sponsored retirement plan. “But since then, we’ve been through two recessions,” she pointed out. In 2010, 52% of employees have access to an employer-sponsored plan.  

Oakley also noted that nearly nine out of 10 households in the top income quartile have retirement accounts, compared to only one out of four households in the lowest income quartile.  

Nari Rhee, Ph.D., author of the NIRS report about its analysis and manager of research at NIRS, said the median balance for households with retirement accounts is $40,000 for working-age individuals and $100,000 for the near-retirement group. “That’s not enough for most households to generate enough retirement income,” she noted.  

NIRS used a universe limited to households with earnings between $5,000 and $500,000 in income, and applied conservative age-specific multipliers from Fidelity to annual income to set a benchmark for each household. It then compared four measures of household financial assets to benchmarks to identify those that fall short, and by how much.

The analysis found 92% of households do not meet the savings target for their age measured by retirement account balances, 90% do not meet the savings target measured by total retirement assets, 85% do not meet the target as measured by total financial assets, and 65% fall short as measured by net worth (defined as assets less debts, including mortgages).  

“These findings are stark. Clearly the retirement system is not working for most households, especially those at low end of income spectrum,” Rhee said.  

Families need to save more and many will work longer, but NIRS contends they cannot fill the gap alone; they need help from employers and policymakers. It says there is a need to strengthen Social Security, improve low- and middle-wage workers’ access to work-related retirement plans, and help low-wage workers save.  

The Institute advocates making retirement savings automatic for all as suggested in automatic IRA proposals, the USA Retirement Funds proposal (see “The Retirement Security Crisis and a Plan to Solve It”), and state-level action, such as the Select Choice program proposed in California (see “Calif. Senate Approves Government-Run Private Worker Retirement Plan”).  

The NIRS report about its analysis is here.

«