Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.
Women 80% More Likely Than Men to be Impoverished in Retirement
Women are
far more likely than men to face financial hardship in retirement, according to
a new report from the National Institute on Retirement Security (NIRS) titled, “Shortchanged
in Retirement: Continuing Challenges to Women’s Financial Future.”
Women age 65 and older have an average income that is 25% lower than men’s. By
age 80, women’s income is 44% lower. In addition, women face higher medical expenses
and are more likely to need more expensive long-term care. Consequently, women
are 80% more likely than men to be impoverished at age 65 or older, while women
age 75 to 79 are three times more likely to fall below the poverty level than
men.
As to what
percentage of female and male senior citizens are impoverished, in the 65-69
age group, it is 6% of men and 8% of women, according to NIRS. In the 70-74 age
group, it is 5% of men and 8% of women. In the 75-79 age group, it is 4% of men
and 12% of women, and among those 80 and older, it is 6% of men and 11% of
women.
“It is well documented that the nation faces a retirement savings crisis, but
the pain is particularly severe for women because we need a bigger retirement
nest egg than men, thanks to our longer life expectancy,” says Diane Oakley,
NIRS executive director and co-author of the report. “This new data is
troubling. It shows that a woman’s nest egg is substantially smaller than a man’s
and that we’re not making real headway toward closing the retirement gender
gap.”
In 2010, men received an average retirement income of $17,856 from a pension, while women received $12,000, or 33% less. In 2014, according to Vanguard, the average amount that men had saved in a 401(k) was $36,875, compared to $24,446 for women, or 34% less. These gaps, NIRS says, are primarily due to the fact that in 2014, women earned an average of $0.79 for every dollar earned by a man.
NEXT: Women working longer to cover shortfall
The report also
finds that the percentage of women between the ages of 55 and 64 in the workforce climbed from
53% in 2000 to 59% in 2015, which suggests, NIRS says, “women may be working
longer in order to make up for lower retirement savings over their careers and
to offset investment losses from the Great Recession.”
Women are also more likely than men to work part-time and to have shorter job
tenure, making it more difficult for them to meet employers’
retirement plan eligibility requirements, according to NIRS.
Women who
are widowed, divorced or over age 70 rely on Social Security benefits for a
majority of their income, NIRS says. However, those who work in health care,
education and public administration fields have higher incomes in retirement
due to pension plans being prevalent in these industries.
NIRS recommends that women save more. The organization is also calling on
policymakers to strengthen Social Security benefits for women and increase
defined contribution plan eligibility for part-time workers.
The report is based on an analysis of the 2012 Survey of Income and Program Participation data from the United States Census. “Shortchanged in Retirement” can be downloaded here.