Updates on IRS Compliance Projects

The IRS released results on two completed projects and announce a new one.

The Internal Revenue Service has released results of two completed Employee Plans Compliance Unit (EPCU) projects and announced a new project.

The EPCU Ineligible Employer-403(b) Plans Project was designed to educate Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 501(c)(3) organizations whose tax-exempt status had been automatically revoked pursuant to IRC Section 6033(j) to ensure an employer eligibility failure had not occurred in the sponsoring of an IRC Section 403(b) plan.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The Project goals were to:

  • Determine if the box 12 code on Forms W-2 was correctly reported;
  • Determine whether or not the organization sponsored an IRC Section 403(b) plan;
  • Verify the sponsor eligibility for an IRC Section 403(b) plan;
  • Advise the organization on corrective actions necessary with regards to their IRC Section 403(b) plan; and
  • Educate IRC Section 403(b) sponsors regarding a written plan document.

The EPCU sent contact letters to 67 entities from the Automatic Revocation of Exemption List that also filed a 2010 Form W-2 reporting employees with IRC Section 403(b) elective deferrals.

Responses showed that the majority of the plan sponsors were educational organizations still eligible to sponsor their IRC Section 403(b) plan. However, some employers incorrectly reported IRC Section 403(b) plan deferrals in box 12 showing that the accuracy of the box 12 codes, in addition to Form 990 filing, is still a concern.

More information is here

NEXT: Partial Termination/Partial Vesting Project

In its Partial Termination/Partial Vesting Project, the EPCU contacted Form 5500 return filers that reported a decrease in plan participants and had participants that were not 100% vested and were terminated from employment. The contact made was to determine if the plan experienced a partial termination. If a partial termination did occur, the goal of this project was to determine whether plan administrators were complying with the vesting requirements of IRC Section 411(d)(3).

Over a span of three years, nearly 2,000 letters were sent. Approximately half of the contacts were due to errors on the Form 5500 return. In many of these cases, the plan sponsors amended their returns and corrected the errors. Taxpayers made errors in participant counts.

Also, a significant number of plans had fully vested all their participants as a result of a partial termination but it was indicated on their Form 5500 that there were participants who were not fully vested.

The plan administrators misinterpreted the Form 5500. They counted eligible participants who chose not to participate in their 401(k) plan as not being fully vested. Some plans did not experience a partial termination because account balances were transferred to another plan but failed to indicate on Form 5500 Schedule H that the assets were in fact transferred to another plan.

Approximately 30% of the cases were closed as “no change” cases. In almost 10% of the cases, it was determined during the compliance check that a partial termination had occurred and affected participants had not been fully vested.

More information about the results of this project is here

NEXT: A new compliance project

The ECPU is undergoing a SIMPLE IRA Plans - Eligible Sponsors Project. The information it has indicates some entities sponsor a SIMPLE IRA plan, but appear to employ more than 100 employees who earn at least $5,000. The goal of the project is to ensure that employers sponsoring a SIMPLE IRA plan are eligible to sponsor those plans.

Code section 408 allows employees and employers to contribute to traditional IRAs set up for employees’ own retirement savings. Employees may choose to make salary reduction contributions and the employer is required to make either matching or non-elective contributions.

An “eligible employer” means an employer which had no more than 100 employees who received at least $5,000 of compensation from the employer for the preceding year. An eligible employer who establishes and maintains a plan under this subsection for one or more years and who fails to be an eligible employer for any subsequent year shall be treated as an eligible employer for the two years following the last year the employer was an eligible employer.

More information is here.

Plan Sponsors Worry About Explaining Income Solutions to Participants

The complexity of explaining retirement income solutions to participants was one of several reasons defined contribution plan sponsors cited for not offering these options in their plans.

Several studies have shown that a growing number of Americans fear running out of money in retirement and many have dismal views on the future of Social Security, making the prospect of retirement income solutions more appealing. However, plan sponsors are facing specific challenges when it comes to implementing these options.

Although 64% of plan sponsors consider it a priority to implement retirement income solutions into their plans, only 16% have done so, according to a recent survey conducted by Corporate Insight in conjunction with the Institutional Investor Institute for Defined Contribution.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Corporate Insight reported that one of the biggest revelations it made following the study was the lack of communication between plan sponsors and retirement plan participants. Only 4% of plan sponsors said they have surveyed their participants to gauge their interest in retirement income solutions. Out of those with retirement income options already in place, only about 8% said they would do so.

In addition, the survey found that a portion of respondents believe these investment vehicles are too complicated to explain to participants, further hindering these plan sponsors from adding retirement income solutions to the funds menu.

Among the concerns about implementing these options, plan sponsors cited a lack of one-size-fits-all choices (28%), a high cost on participants (19%), waiting on in-plan safe harbor before moving forward (16%), and the complexity of explaining retirement income solutions to participants (15%).

The survey also found that many plan sponsors have trouble deciding the best course of action to take when implementing income solutions. According to Corporate Insight, “Survey results indicate in-plan solutions (41%) and a combo of in-plan and out-of-plan solutions (35%) are the most desirable. Out-of-plan solutions alone (14%) are highly undesirable, but plans with an asset size of more than $10 billion strongly prefer them (31%). Those currently with a retirement income solution in place more frequently considered in-plan solutions (55%).”

Plan sponsors also have mixed reactions when it comes to investment options. The most popular option was managed accounts with a payout option cited by 55% of respondents. The remaining choices each were cited by 18% of respondents: in-plan annuity with no guarantee, out-of-plan solution, a combination in-plan and out-of-plan solution, and other.

The 2015 PLANSPONSOR Defined Contribution Survey found that “when it comes to annuities or income products that guarantee income, nearly one in six defined contribution plans (58.6%) offer no type of income product. A mere 6.9% of DC plans offer in-plan income products that guarantee monthly income. Further, only 3.5% of plans offer an out-of-plan annuity purchase/bidding service. However, out-of-plan annuity purchase/bidding services are offered by 15.5% of mega plans.”

For more information about Corporate Insight’s survey, visit the Corporate Insight blog.

 

«