For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.
Understanding the New 403(b) Model Disclosure Form
One of the key reasons for the 403(b) Transparency Taskforce’s new 403(b) model disclosure form is so vendors can show plan sponsors that they offer more than just products, according to industry experts.
Robert J. Toth Jr., Esq., Law Office of Robert J. Toth Jr., told attendees of the National Tax Sheltered Accounts Association’s (NTSAA) 403(b) Advisor Summit that plan sponsors will see the services vendors offer on the form. The U.S. Department of Labor (DoL) is requiring vendors to provide fee disclosure to sponsors of Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)-governed 403(b) plans (see “DoL Issues Final Rule on Fee Disclosure”); the Taskforce’s Model Disclosure Form is for sponsors of non-ERISA plans.
Debra A. Davis, ASPPA, said the form is just a suggestion for non-ERISA plans. The Taskforce used the DoL’s disclosure rules to establish what should be disclosed by non-ERISA plans.
According to Davis, states and school districts are reconsidering their retirement plan offerings. Some are considering a statewide 403(b) plan, which will result in vendor consolidation. In addition, consultants are telling states to lower fees. Davis said the Model Disclosure Form shows lawmakers that states don’t have to move to a lower fee model; instead, they can inform participants and let them choose.
If legislators required disclosures to non-ERISA plans, that would give authority to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which would look to the DoL regulations for ERISA plans as guidance. The form is a way for the non-ERISA industry to set a standard and regulate themselves before the government steps in, Davis said.
Toth noted that some vendors will automatically provide disclosures to non-ERISA plans, either because they feel it is a best practice or because their system can’t differentiate between ERISA and non-ERISA plans.
Davis said the preference is to provide the information to participants before they make investment decisions. For one thing, participants should be informed of any contract surrender charges so they know what they are getting into.
Robert J. Toth Jr., Esq., Law Office of Robert J. Toth Jr., told attendees of the National Tax Sheltered Accounts Association’s (NTSAA) 403(b) Advisor Summit that plan sponsors will see the services vendors offer on the form. The U.S. Department of Labor (DoL) is requiring vendors to provide fee disclosure to sponsors of Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)-governed 403(b) plans (see “DoL Issues Final Rule on Fee Disclosure”); the Taskforce’s Model Disclosure Form is for sponsors of non-ERISA plans.
Debra A. Davis, ASPPA, said the form is just a suggestion for non-ERISA plans. The Taskforce used the DoL’s disclosure rules to establish what should be disclosed by non-ERISA plans.
According to Davis, states and school districts are reconsidering their retirement plan offerings. Some are considering a statewide 403(b) plan, which will result in vendor consolidation. In addition, consultants are telling states to lower fees. Davis said the Model Disclosure Form shows lawmakers that states don’t have to move to a lower fee model; instead, they can inform participants and let them choose.
If legislators required disclosures to non-ERISA plans, that would give authority to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which would look to the DoL regulations for ERISA plans as guidance. The form is a way for the non-ERISA industry to set a standard and regulate themselves before the government steps in, Davis said.
Toth noted that some vendors will automatically provide disclosures to non-ERISA plans, either because they feel it is a best practice or because their system can’t differentiate between ERISA and non-ERISA plans.
Davis said the preference is to provide the information to participants before they make investment decisions. For one thing, participants should be informed of any contract surrender charges so they know what they are getting into.