Data & Research July 24, 2015

Two in Three Private Workers Offered Retirement Plan

The Bureau of Labor Statistics released its March National Compensation Survey findings.
Reported by

Fully two-thirds (66%) of private industry workers were offered a retirement savings plan in March, the Bureau of Labor Statistics found in its National Compensation Survey. Among workers in the lowest wage category, the 10th percentile, only 31% had access to a retirement plan. By contrast, among those in the highest wage category, the 90th percentile, 88% had access to a retirement plan.

In state and local government, 99% of full-time workers had access to retirement and medical care benefits, and 98% were offered paid sick leave. For part-time workers in state and local government, 39% had access to retirement benefits, 24% to medical benefits and 42% to paid sick leave. Among state and local government workers in the lowest wage category, 61% had access to retirement benefits, versus 98% of workers in the highest wage category.

As to what percentage of medical coverage premiums employers required their workers to pay, among private industry nonunion companies, the single coverage requirement was 23%, and the family coverage requirement was 35%. For union shops, the single coverage requirement was 13% and for family coverage, it was 16%.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Paid holidays were offered to 90% of full-time and 37% of part-time workers in private industries. In state and local government, 74% of full-time and 30% of part-time workers had such access.

Access to benefits differed widely among occupational groups, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said. Eighty-seven percent of workers in management and professional jobs in private industries had access to medical care, compared to 41% of those in service occupations. In state and local government, the figures were 89% and 82%, respectively.

Among companies with fewer than 50 employees, 53% of civilian workers were offered medical coverage, but for workers at companies employing 500 workers or more, that jumped to 90%.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics said its benefits survey represented 131 million civilian workers. Of this number, 112 million were private industry workers and 19 million were state and local government workers.

In Practice July 24, 2015

Open Architecture and Custom Investing Trends

Experts predict the custom institutional asset management industry will approach $3 trillion AUM by 2020.
Reported by

Custom solution assets have more than doubled since 2010 and show little sign of slowing, according to recent research from Cerulli Associates. A report from the firm, “Institutional Custom Solutions 2015: The Drive Towards Objectives-Based Solutions,” suggests investment services “devised to meet specific institutional client objectives” will grow by more than $1 trillion over the next five years to hit the $3 trillion target.

The classic example of going custom in the retirement space is working with an asset manager to build a unique target-date fund (TDF) glide path designed for a specific retirement plan client. An adviser or consultant will often be called in to help work on the asset allocation, manager selection and other components, especially how to price, track and report the fund.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Alexi Maravel, an associate director at Cerulli, says custom solutions “have the potential to upend decades-old practices of asset managers and investment consultants in assisting institutional investors in meeting their goals.”

It’s a sentiment shared often with PLANADVISER. On the defined benefit (DB) side, pension plan sponsors are focused on using liability driven investing (LDI) principles that go beyond maximizing returns and aim at reducing specific risks and overall volatility in the plan’s funded status. For defined contribution plans (DC), much of the focus is on use of custom target-date funds (TDFs), with upwards of one in three plan sponsors using or considering TDFs that strive to better match the investment approach with the needs of a given plan population, according to the SEI Defined Contribution Research Panel.

In a recent conversation, Jake Gilliam, managing director and senior portfolio manager at Charles Schwab Investment Management, noted his firm takes a different stance. He agrees the market “is really starting to recognize the importance of getting more sophisticated in the investment construction process,” but not all plan sponsors have an interest in creating and tracking custom portfolios.

“When you go custom you have to start from scratch,” he says. A less work-intensive alternative for sponsors is to consider an open-architecture investment approach, which does not involve a custom glide path. Open architecture funds come with a prepackaged and centrally managed glide path, Gilliam explains, but they add value by looking across investment providers to pick best-of-class funds when building out the underlying investment allocations. 

NEXT: Away from proprietary

“What we are seeing is plan sponsors looking at open architecture and deciding to move that way, because it is easier for the plan sponsor,” Gilliam adds. “Where you see custom being more prevalent is in the mega-plan market. In my experience, most plans out there don’t want to take on the custom tasks on a daily basis.”

Gilliam points to a variety of causes driving greater consideration of open architecture portfolios. One main cause, he feels, is the Department of Labor’s (DOL) advisory publication that actively encourages plan sponsors to look deeper under the hood of their investment solutions. Beyond this, plan sponsors are taking seriously their fiduciary duty and the related obligation to explore ways to save on investment fees and to improve performance.

“Something else is that these subjects have continued to get a lot of press in the industry media resources, and I think that’s a great thing,” Gilliam says. 

Maravel says these tailwinds are also benefiting custom investment providers, leading to optimism about their growth prospects.

“It’s not surprising that firms overseeing custom solutions assets today are so bullish about the future,” he explains. “Respondents to Cerull’s proprietary survey reported more than 58% growth in custom solutions client assets during the past year, as well as the winning of an average of 13.4 solutions mandates during the same time period.”

Gilliam stresses that open architecture and custom investing have key differences, but clearly advisers are benefiting from business engagements on both ends.

“Advisers can sell their strong selection and due-diligence process,” Gilliam explains. “Overwhelmingly, they are hearing our message and they are identifying with it, and they are taking the DOL’s guidance seriously.”

«