Transfers Favor Stable Value, But Contributions Cling to Lifestyle

401(k) participants moved assets out of equity into fixed-income investments again in July – a month that saw participant transfers favoring the latter on more than 90% of the trading days.

According to the results of the Hewitt 401(k) Index, more than $692 million was shifted out of equities into fixed-income asset classes in July – approximately $228 million moved out of large U.S. equity funds, and $208 million moved out of international funds (26% of the outflows). In addition, $144 million was transferred out of balanced funds during the month.

GIC/stable value funds were the largest recipients of the net transfers, as they have been throughout the first half of 2008 (see 401(k) Participants Follow Move from Equity Trend in June). In July, inflows ($659 million) to this asset class represented 83% of the net transfers. Bond funds also received 13% of the net inflows, representing $101 million. The remainder went to company stock (3.17%), and money market (1.32%).

Those transfers notwithstanding, overall volumes remained modest in July. Just 0.05% of account balances were transferred on a daily net basis, and was above “normal’ transfer levels on just three of the 20 trading days during the month. *A “normal” level of relative transfer activity is when the net daily movement of participants’ balances as a percent of total 401(k) balances within the Hewitt 401(k) Index equals between 0.3 times and 1.5 times the average daily net activity of the preceding 12 months.

The combination of transfers and poor market conditions resulted in a decline in overall equity exposure. Only 61.7% of participants’ assets were allocated to equity investments by the end of July, returning to a level last seen in the middle of 2003, according to Hewitt. At month’s end, nearly a quarter of the assets tracked by the index were invested in GIC/Stable Value, 18.5% in large US equity, while just under 10% were invested in lifestyle/pre-mix offerings. Among the remaining asset classes, company stock represented 15.55%, international 8.44%, balanced 5.84%, and bond funds, 4.47%.

Contribution Trends

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Lifestyle/pre-mix funds drew most of the new contributions – nearly one in every five dollars contributed, in fact. Large US equity attracted 17.42%, and GIC/stable value nearly as much (16.94%), while company stock (15.17%) was just behind. International offerings may have suffered notable transfers out, but still managed to attract just over 10% of July’s contributions.

Considering only participant contributions, 20.89% went to lifestyle/pre-mix funds, 19.27% to large US equity, and 18.66% to GIC/Stable Value. Of the remaining categories, participants invested 11.26% of their monthly contributions in international funds, 7.07% to company stock, 6.68% to small US equity, 5.46% to bond funds, and 3.65% to balanced offerings.

IMHO: Crisis of Confidence

I’m old enough to have been a driver (albeit a young one) the last time we had a “real″ gas crisis.

You remember – the one where the issue was not being able to buy gas, not just being able to afford to buy gas?

I can still remember the national sense of frustration when a bunch of crackpots in Iran held 52 Americans hostage for 444 days; the concerns when the USSR, using language startlingly similar to that employed during the recent invasion of Georgia, strolled into Afghanistan—and, yes, I can still remember what a “real’ recession felt like (the one where we actually had a 5% drop in GDP).

I also remember the “response’ of our leaders in Washington at the time. Now, it’s easy to sit on the sidelines and judge those who actually have to make the tough decisions, but I think it’s fair to say that a common sentiment was that we were “getting what we deserved.’ America had too long strutted the world stage imposing its values on others, some said—this was just the ghosts of Vietnam and Watergate coming home to roost. We were told that we were suffering from a crisis of confidence, a “national malaise.’ It was, some said, simply time we, as a nation, learned to make do with less.

Fortunately, IMHO, not everyone accepted that assessment as a foregone conclusion. The turnaround wasn’t overnight, and it wasn’t easy. But it began with a leader who saw America’s best days still ahead, who was willing to call to mind that “shining city on the hill.’ Frankly, it began when people began to believe they could solve the problems confronting them, rather than being victims of circumstance.

Now, I wouldn’t for a moment suggest that the current economy isn’t struggling. Like you, I feel the anger every time I pull up to the pump—that I get excited at the prospect of paying (slightly) less than $4/gallon is troubling, in and of itself. Like yours, no doubt, my 401(k) portfolio has seen (much) better days, and I have every reason to expect that I’ll be paying twice as much to heat my home this winter as I did a year ago.

Unfortunately, it seems that there is today a growing chorus of “it’s all our own fault’ and a willingness, if not an eagerness—at least on the part of some—to once again effectively throw in the towel. Not just on the economy, mind you, or gas prices, but on the employer-sponsored retirement system.

Encouraging Words

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

It was encouraging, therefore, to see this week’s report from Fidelity that suggested that deferrals were up, albeit slightly, even while balances were down over the past year. It was even more encouraging that participants who had been deferring into the same plan year over year saw a more significant increase (see “Fidelity Says Participants Saving More’), while statistics on participant loans (down slightly) and hardship withdrawals (up slightly) suggest that participants are, in large part, not only staying the course, but upping their ante.

Our industry has long cautioned against the consequences of not preparing adequately for retirement, but those June 30 participant statements were almost certainly a shock to participants who had been acting on those admonitions. Certainly there were some (perhaps many) who, as the averages in the Fidelity study suggest, saw their entire quarter’s contributions apparently “disappear’ into the ether, swept under by the market’s maelstrom. That will, no doubt, fan concerns about how “safe’ your 401(k) (or 403(b) or 457) plan is.

Without question, changes will be required. The three-legged stool, to the extent it ever existed (see “Saving While You Still Work“) , is a thing of the past for most workers. We may well have to rethink our notion of retirement—though I’m not sure that notion will wind up being much different than the one our parents are already living. And yes, I think the federal government may well be part of the solution—but I don’t think most Americans want government to be THE solution.

The Fidelity survey offers hope—a reassurance that we can make (and are making) a difference; that we don’t necessarily have to lower our expectations of people. We could always do more—and perhaps better—of course. We need to keep exploring the reasons people hesitate to save, or don’t save enough. We need to continue to find solutions, like target-date funds, that make it easy to do the right things when it comes to retirement savings. We need to be willing to be open and honest not only about the goals and risks of these programs, but about their costs. We need to continue to encourage employers of all sizes to remain committed to these programs (see “IMHO: Why Knots“).

And, yes, we need to do all of that with an appreciation of the importance of our mission—and confidence in the abilities of ourselves and our profession to succeed.

«