The Future Has More Assets and Fewer Staff

A few data points in particular jump out of a new Charles Schwab study that clearly indicate the fundamental changes experienced by the advisory industry in the last decade.

Wave 20 of Schwab Advisor Services’ Independent Advisor Outlook Study (IAOS) marks a decade of data on independent financial professionals’ views of the industry, their businesses, their clients, and the investing environment.

For the 10-year anniversary edition of IAOS, Schwab “looked more closely at how advisers’ perspectives and practices have changed over the last decade and captured how they expect the industry and their businesses to continue to evolve in the decade to come.”

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Reviewing the data, there can be little doubt that advisory practices have evolved in a pretty significant way since 2006. For example, average assets under advisement per independent firm started the decade at $251 million, growing to reach $339 this year. Yet average staff size is down significantly, dropping from an average of 27 staffers per firm down to 17 this year.

“Over the past decade, the advisers in the IAOS study have built businesses that have achieved growth and scale against a backdrop of volatility, market highs and lows, and forces of change ranging from the regulatory environment to technology,” observes Bernie Clark, executive vice president and head of Schwab Advisor Services. “They have done this with a constant focus on their clients, while embracing change and seizing opportunities.”

Given the reduction in staff size, it’s reasonable to assume the increased adoption of scale-building technology in both the investment and client relationship management portions of the business have paid off for many firms. Further, according to the research, advisers are “no longer spending the majority of their time working in their physical offices, and as they look ahead, this trend becomes more pronounced … Where once the advisers’ time was focused mainly on portfolio management and asset allocation, this is now changing.”

Interestingly, it appears that some industry practices are not going away, despite other areas of major reformation. For example, most new clients are still acquired through referrals, as has been the case in the last decade, and Charles Schwab says there is no indication in the data that this will change.

NEXT: Fiduciary embrace 

It appears from the Charles Schwab analysis that advisers have come to grips with a future that is to be dominated by the fiduciary standard and restrictions set up by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act—at least when it comes to servicing defined contribution (DC) or individual retirement account (IRA) clients.

“In the past, today, and in the future, advisers see their role as a fiduciary as being at the center of the value proposition they present to clients,” the study concludes.

It does not appear that advisers believe building a stronger fiduciary relationship with clients will necessarily require more face-to-face time. Many will take advantage of video conferencing, social media platforms, etc. According to the research, advisers believe technology will have a profound effect on the way independent firms do business over the next 10 years, and more than three quarters (78%) believe changes will be “noticeable compared to how their firms operate today.”

Advisers remain mixed in their outlook when it comes to automated investment platforms.

“When asked about the prevalence of automated investing offers among RIA firms broadly in the next 10 years, there is a divergence of opinion,” Charles Schwab finds. “Overall, more than one-third of advisers say their firm currently uses an automated investment solution, or is very or somewhat likely to offer one in the next 10 years … Notably, age affects the outlook on automated investment management.”

Roughly half of Millennial-aged advisory professionals say they will offer a robo-solution in the next decade, versus one in three Gen X or Boomer advisers, who appear much more committed to traditional business tactics. Still, the vast majority of advisers hope more efficient systems will allow them to serve more clients—and that the bulk of client documents will be handled digitally in the future.

The full analysis is available for download here

A TDF With Income in Mind May Use Different Asset Allocations

Comparing the asset allocations between traditional and income-oriented TDF portfolios found greater allocations to high income-generating investments, according to a Wilshire analysis.

Adding a range of high income-generating investments could significantly boost income returns for retirement-stage target-date funds (TDFs), a study suggests.

The research from Wilshire Funds Management, sponsored by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) was based on portfolio optimizations using 40 years of investment return data through 2015. It found that adding a range of high income-generating assets to a traditional retirement-stage TDF portfolio could boost income returns by nearly 40%, while providing comparable total returns and no increase in risk.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Wilshire’s research is based on a variation of the mean-variance optimization (MVO) method for portfolio modelling. While traditional MVO models are designed to determine optimum levels of various portfolio assets that will produce a maximum total return for a specified level of risk, Wilshire’s income-oriented mean-variance optimization (IOMVO) model also incorporates a requirement for a specified level of income return.

Wilshire found that a traditional MVO-modeled portfolio that delivered a 2.37% annual income return and a 5.37% annual total return with an 8% level of portfolio risk could be enhanced with IOMVO modelling to deliver a greater annual income return of 3.25% and a comparable 5.27% annual total return with the same 8% level of risk.

NEXT: Change in asset allocations

Comparing the asset allocations between the traditional and income-oriented portfolios:

  • Equity allocations were reduced from 35% of the MVO portfolio to between 3% and 15% of the IOMVO portfolio;
  • High-yield bonds and preferred stocks became key parts of the IOMVO portfolio. The allocation to these assets increased from 9% to between 22.7% and 25%;
  • Non-U.S. developed market stock allocations rose from 4% of the MVO portfolio to between 9% and 23.5% of the IOMVO portfolio; and
  • REIT allocations rose from zero in the MVO portfolio to approximately 8% of the IOMVO portfolio.

“Depending on the income needs of the investor, portfolios that generate less income may require retirees to dig deeper and more frequently into their savings to fund their expenses, potentially resulting in the depletion of their assets while they are still living,” says Wilshire Funds Management Chief Investment Officer Joshua Emanuel. “Income-oriented portfolios with significant allocations to assets like REITs, high-yield bonds, preferred stocks and non-U.S. developed stocks may help investors meet the challenge of producing retirement income with less reliance on their savings,”

To learn more about the Wilshire study, “Income-Oriented Retirement Portfolios: Challenges and Solutions, 2016” and download the full report, visit https://www.reit.com/reitsandretirement.

«