The settlements include a provision that would bar Secretary of Labor Eugene Scalia from continuing his efforts in a lawsuit he filed regarding the same matter.
The ruling states there are genuine disputes of material facts as to make summary judgement, whether in favor of the plaintiffs or the defense, inappropriate at this time.
The insurer is charged with engaging in a prohibited transaction under ERISA when the fees were charged during a move to a new provider, as well as with...
The plaintiffs’ plea to the Supreme Court questions the precedents set by Fifth Third v. Dudenhoeffer—a 2014 high court ruling that significantly raised the pleading standards for ERISA...
Among other important developments, the Department of Labor has confirmed that one cannot simply write their way out of a functional fiduciary relationship.
A recent decision filed by the U.S. Supreme Court has significant implications in the area of ERISA preemption of state laws and regulations, though the direct impact on...
The proposed agreement stipulates that the class counsel does not intend to seek recovery of any attorneys’ fees or litigation costs from Community Health Systems (CHS) in connection...
The short, pro-defense ruling concludes that the lead plaintiff has not exhausted all potential administrative remedies, making a lawsuit inappropriate at this juncture.
A federal judge granted Cerner’s motion to dismiss the case then reopened it on the same day, announcing the parties were to discuss a potential settlement.