Study Shows Participants Who Use TDFs Stick with Them

401(k) participants who invested in target-date funds (TDFs) overwhelmingly tend to stick with these investments over time, according the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI).    

EBRI reports that just over 90% of 401(k) participants investing in TDFs in 2007 stuck with them through 2009. Using a proxy for the auto-enrollment status of participants, those identified as auto-enrollees were even more likely to have stayed with TDFs, at a rate of over 95%.

EBRI’s research found 401(k) participants who were younger and had lower account balances were more likely to use TDFs and to continue to use them. Those more likely to stop investing in TDFs were older, had longer tenure, or had higher account balances, although these participants overall stayed with TDFs at a high rate. 

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

“Target-date funds are still very new in 401(k) plans, but these results suggest that once they are used, TDFs are very likely to continue to be used for a number of years afterward, certainly in the short term,” said Craig Copeland, Senior Research Associate at EBRI and author of the report. “Consequently, the auto-enrollment of participants into TDFs appears likely to stick, which means that the asset allocation within the TDFs is likely to be the asset allocation many of these participants will have while they remain in their 401(k) plan.” 

The use of TDFs in 401(k) plans has increased rapidly in recent years, EBRI said. The portion of 401(k) plan participants using TDFs increased from 25% in 2007 to 31 percent% in 2008 and to 33% in 2009. According to EBRI, one of the reasons for this growth is TDFs have been a popular choice for the default fund when 401(k) plans have an auto-enrollment feature. Consequently, younger participants with lower account balances, and participants with shorter tenure at their current job have been found to be more likely to use them. 

Key findings in the study show:

  In 2007, of those participants in the EBRI's database, 38.9% had at least some of their account balance in TDFs. By 2008, 42.6% had at least some of their account balance in TDFs, reaching 43.2% in 2009. Furthermore, 36.6% of this consistent group of 401(k) plan participants had some of their account balance allocated to TDFs in 2007 and 2008. Just over 35% of these participants had at least some assets allocated to TDFs in 2007, 2008, and 2009. 

  Among participants who were identified as auto-enrollees in 2007, 97.2% were still using TDFs in 2008, and 95.7% used them in 2008 and 2009. While those not identified as auto-enrollees continued to invest in TDFs at a lower rate than those identified as auto-enrollees, there was a very high overall persistence rate in TDF use from 2007−2009: just over 90%. 

  Of the consistent group of participants using TDFs in 2007, 36.9% had all of their account allocated to TDFs. The remaining 63.1% of those using a TDF had less than 100% of their allocation in TDFs. In 2009, slightly more participants (67.2%) had less than 100% of their allocation in TDFs. 

  Among only those participants who had all of their account allocated to TDFs in 2007, a very high rate (83%) stayed at a 100% TDF allocation in 2009. Almost 13% of those who had a total allocation to TDFs in 2007 had an allocation lower than 100% (but not a zero) allocation in 2009. Only 4% of participants with a 100% TDF allocation in 2007 had stopped using them by 2009. 

  While a very small percentage of those investing all of their account in TDFs in 2007 stopped using them by 2009, the average participant-weighted allocation for this group to equity funds/company stock/balanced funds in 2009 was 31.1% and approximately 65% to bond funds, money funds, guaranteed investment contracts (GICs), and/or stable value funds in 2009. 

The EBRI report examines the use of TDFs by a consistent group of 401(k) participants in plans that offered them in 2007 through 2009, using the data from the EBRI/ICI 401(k) database. Results are published in the August EBRI Issue Brief, “Target-Date Fund Use in 401(k) Plans and the Persistence of Their Use, 2007−2009,” online at www.ebri.org

DoL Sues Trustees over Plan Loan Violations

The U.S. Department of Labor has sued trustees of a benefit fund for violating the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) regarding loans issued from the fund.

An investigation by the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) found the United Employee Benefit Fund’s trustees, David Fensler and Anthony Monaco, allegedly approved at least 194 loans from the fund to individual participants between January 1997 and December 31, 2009. Those loans were improper, unsecured, and allowed to become delinquent. Forty-two loans had no supporting documentation, and in some instances, the loans exceeded 50% of the value of the participants’ accrued benefit, which is a separate violation of ERISA.  

According to the announcement, as of December 31, 2009, none of the loans approved by the trustees had been paid back to the fund in full, and only six of the participants had ever made any payments on loans issued to them. Fensler and Monaco allegedly made no effort to enforce the terms of the loan documents or collect payments, in violation of the plan’s governing documents and ERISA.  

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The suit seeks to recover all assets that may be available under the law, which amount to more than $1 million. It also seeks to require Fensler and Monaco to correct the prohibited transactions in which they engaged and to restore to the fund any losses, including lost opportunity costs, resulting from their fiduciary breaches.  

The United Employee Benefit Fund was established by the Professional Workers Master Contract Group and the National Production Workers Union Local 707 to provide welfare, medical, death, disability, and child care facility benefits to the fund’s participants. As of December 31, 2009, the fund had approximately 281 participants.  

The case is Solis v. David Fensler, Anthony Monaco and United Employee Benefit Fund, Civil Action Number: 1:11-cv-06031.

«