Small Business Owners Prefer Financial Service Companies to Manage Retirement Plans

Eighty-nine percent of small employers surveyed said they have a high level of trust in retirement plan providers, compared to 53% for state governments.

Small U.S. employers overwhelmingly trust the financial services sector for its expertise more than government entities when it comes to administering financial assets and retirement savings programs, a survey sponsored by the SPARK Institute and conducted by Cerulli Associates found.

The survey asked participants to rank large financial services firms; third parties, including local and state government; and associations such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, with respect to managing finances and retirement plans. Eighty-nine percent of respondents said they have a high level of trust in retirement plan providers, compared to 53% for state governments.

The survey also evaluated employer knowledge of state-run programs. Cerulli says that if such programs, two of which are currently running in California and Oregon, are set up correctly, they can be cost-effective and simple for employers to administer. The downsides, however, are they offer limited savings opportunities and are run differently in each state.

Cerulli notes that multiple employer plans, or MEPs, also provide simplified administration and lower costs for smaller employers. However, they still require the employer to take on the fiduciary duty to select and monitor the MEP. Individual plans, such as 401(k)s, require a higher level of employer responsibilities and fiduciary duties—but they can be customized to suit each workplace and are powerful tools for attracting and retaining talent.

“Our findings show that the proposed coverage solutions are not mutually exclusive,” says Tim Rouse, executive director of the SPARK Institute. “State-run programs, MEPs and individual plans all have appealing qualities to employers at different stages of their growth. An effective retirement system provides alternatives to U.S. employers and gives them the ability to move easily from one program to the other as their workforce changes and evolves.”

SPARK says it believes that covering all working Americans with a retirement plan should be a priority and is an achievable goal. Currently, half of employees at small employers do not have access to an employer-sponsored savings plan. SPARK says it supports the Retirement Enhancement and Savings Act (RESA), which would pave the way for more MEPs; currently the MEP market is $211 billion and experiencing modest inflows.

Additionally, Cerulli says state-sponsored plans “represents a rare growth opportunity [for] small businesses in the mature U.S. recordkeeping and asset management industries.” However, fewer than one-quarter of small business owners that currently do not offer a retirement plan say they would be “very likely” to join a third-party sponsored plan. Cerulli says that to be successful, state-run retirement plans would need to be mandatory, although small business owners would, in all likelihood, object to that.

SECURE Act Gets Fast-Track Treatment in Congress

The House Ways & Means Committee has already approved the bill, which mirrors many of the key provisions of the Retirement Enhancement and Savings Act.

The House Ways & Means Committee has advanced the “Setting Every Community Up For Retirement Enhancement Act of 2019,” or SECURE Act, making the move less than a week after the bill’s formal introduction.

The vote by the Ways & Means Committee clears the path for full House consideration of the sweeping retirement reform legislation, which has subsumed many provisions of the popular and bipartisan Retirement Enhancement and Savings Act of 2019. Industry experts agree that RESA and now the SECURE Act represent the most significant potential changes to the U.S. retirement system to be debated in more than a decade.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Like RESA, the SECURE Act contains popular measures to help Americans prepare for their long-term financial future by expanding opportunities to save for retirement in tax-qualified accounts; increasing access to lifetime income products that enjoy fiduciary protections; helping savers make informed decisions about the optional annuitization of assets; and otherwise enhancing automatic enrollment and escalation features of workplace retirement plans. The SECURE Act further includes provisions to remove restrictions on small employers’ currently limited ability to band together in a multiple employer plan (open MEP).

In voting to approve the bill for full House consideration, bipartisan members of the committee said they are optimistic about the legislation’s future.

News of the SECURE Act’s House passage comes on the same day that Senators on the Finance Committee reintroduced a version of RESA for their chamber’s consideration. 

«