SEC Requires Public Companies to Disclose Cybersecurity Data

Annual reports must include information on the issuer’s cybersecurity management and governance, and they must disclose material incidents within 4 business days.


The Securities and Exchange Commission finalized rules which will require public companies to disclose their cybersecurity risk strategy, management and governance and disclose material cybersecurity incidents within four business days. The rules were initially proposed in March 2022. The final versions passed by a vote of 3 to 2 on Wednesday.

Under the rules, issuers will be required to disclose on Form 8K the occurrence of a material cybersecurity incident within four business days of determining that the event is material. Eric Gerding, the director of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance, said that disclosure of events currently varies in its specificity and timing, which makes it difficult for investors to locate the information and act on it.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Laura Jehl, co-chair of the privacy, cybersecurity and data strategy practice group and a partner in Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, says that the definition of materiality in these rules is the same as in other contexts: An event that a reasonable investor would want to know about in decision making, for reasons such as financial impact or reputational factors, is material.

The disclosure must include the nature, scope, timing and impact of the event. Jessica Wachter, the director of the SEC’s Division for Economic Risk and Analysis, noted that, unlike the proposal, issuers do not need to disclose the technicalities of the event, which will limit their exposure to follow-up attacks that might take advantage of their disclosed vulnerabilities.

Companies can seek a delay in disclosure if they receive permission in writing from the U.S. attorney general that a disclosure presents a risk to national security or a threat to public safety. This would trigger up to two delays, each of 30 days. If the attorney general finds that the threat is a severe one, companies can postpone disclosure for an additional 60 days, up to a total of 120days.

Commissioner Hester Peirce, who dissented, remarked that obtaining this permission from the Department of Justice in four business days will be “quite the feat.”

Jehl says a direct channel to the attorney general is “not something that many have in place now.” She adds, however, that requests of this kind from law enforcement are “pretty unusual these days” and would probably come as an FBI request that arises from national security concerns. Nevertheless, Jehl acknowledges that obtaining a delay will be “tough to do,” and this exception is “not very meaningful.”

The delay process was requested by many commenters and stakeholders, though it does not address the concerns about delay requests that could arise from law enforcement agencies.

In addition to specific incidents, companies will also need to disclose details about their cybersecurity risk management and governance. This includes the expertise of managers and committees assigned to cybersecurity. Commissioner Mark Uyeda, who voted against the rule, quipped that issuers must disclose information about cybersecurity managers that is “equal to their resumes.”

Wachter explained that these disclosures are intended to correct information asymmetries for investors and lead to better pricing. They will also lead to more efficient capital formation by building trust in issuers. Additionally, these disclosures will lead to “positive externalities” by raising awareness and “promoting better decision making.”

Peirce did not agree with this characterization. She said at Wednesday’s hearing that the incident disclosures made in four days or fewer are likely to be vague and incomplete and will trigger overreactions and therefore less efficient pricing. Uyeda agreed and said, “Early information is often incomplete and not correct.”

Jehl explains that industry actors often share information about digital breaches anyway, and this exchange is encouraged by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, part of the Department of Homeland Security. She says the disclosure rules are “intended to address investors” so that they can make more informed decisions.

The SEC will begin enforcing the rule for annual reports with 2023 reports, while incident reports will become required 90 days after the rule’s entry into the Federal Register, according to Jehl.

Cybersecurity is an issue of growing importance to the SEC. Commissioner Jaime Lizárraga noted that the average cost of a breach is approximately $9.4 million. The SEC currently has two additional proposals, one to update Reg SCI and another to update Reg S-P, still outstanding.

Schwab Retirement Plan Services Partners With Newport, Conduent to Expand Capabilities

Schwab will offer increased services in nonqualified deferred compensation and defined benefit plans, highlighting a push toward large retirement plan sponsors.

Schwab Retirement Plan Services, a division of Charles Schwab Corp., announced Wednesday partnerships with retirement solution providers Newport, an Ascensus LLC company, and Conduent Inc. to expand Schwab’s nonqualified deferred compensation and defined benefit plan services.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Schwab announced that it entered the relationships to expand services in the “larger segments of the retirement plan market,” with services that will start in 2024. Schwab will remain as plan provider, with support from Conduent and Newport, and plan sponsors and participants will continue to access their DB and deferred compensation plans through Schwab’s platform.

“We believe these relationships with Conduent and Newport will be a strategic accelerator for us in terms of long-term growth,” says Traci Stahl, chief operating officer of Schwab Workplace Financial Services. “We are continually getting requests from plan sponsors with complex needs that we can now serve through these partnerships. … They don’t want to be using multiple providers—they want to be with one provider that can meet all of those complexities.”

Schwab has been offering NQ and DB plan services for years, but with a focus on 401(k) plans and without some of the capabilities that Conduent and Newport will add, Stahl says. Many of Schwab’s clients, Stahl notes, end up having additional needs due to mergers and acquisitions that can change the make-up of their companies.

Schwab Retirement Plan Services ranks as the eighth largest 401(k) provider by assets, according to PLANSPONSOR’s most recent recordkeeper survey. The provider reported record attendance in its 401(k) educational sessions with participants in March, highlighting its focus on connecting directly with participants about financial management needs.

The expanded capabilities for NQ plans will include nonqualified plan administration; plan design, legal, tax and accounting resources; detailed plan sponsor financial reporting; direct participant payments and W-2 income statement services; and asset liability management, among other areas.

“We’re proud to work with Schwab Retirement Plan Services and offer Newport’s highly respected nonqualified deferred compensation expertise and services to their clients and participants,” David Musto, president and CEO of Ascensus, said in a statement.

Stahl noted key aspects as being the ability for Schwab to manage nonqualified plan documents for plan sponsors, as well as the direct income payments and W-2 income statements the firm can now administer.

On the DB side, the partnership will bring clients with traditional pension plans and cash balance plans services including: data analytics, compliance and reporting tools; support for data remediation and audit services; interactive calculators for participant planning; de-risking strategies, including pension risk transfer, annuity conversion and term vested lump sum payment programs; and administration for frozen DB plans.

For DB plans, Stahl pointed to the de-risking strategies and the administration for frozen and terminated defined benefit plans as key areas clients are requesting.

Charles Schwab has been discussing the additional capabilities with retirement consultants and has “received an extremely positive response,” Stahl says. “They are on those existing relationships, and now can offer these enhanced services.”

Correction: Story corrected to clarify that the expanded services are for nonqualfied deferred compensation services and DB plans.

«