Retirement Plan Tax Benefits Decreased Household Stock Ownership

Household stock ownership has decreased, as the tax benefits associated with owning stocks inside a pension plan increase, according to a study from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

“The particular tax policies that have influenced stock ownership are those that on the one hand have increased households’ income tax, and on the other have created the possibility for pre-tax savings,” said Ilya Strebulaev, associate professor of finance and Spence Faculty Scholar for 2010-2011, a coauthor of the study.  

Such policies, he notes, are fairly recent, having originated only in the 1930s in the United States. The study found that just after World War II, individual citizens owned 90% of the stock market; by 2006, they owned only 30%.   

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Using empirical data, Strebulaev and his coauthors, Kristian Rydqvist and Joshua Spizman of Binghamton University in New York, made the discovery that up to 70% of all stocks in the United States — held by domestic agents such as mutual funds, pension funds, and insurance companies — are now kept in tax-deferred plans.  

The researchers also looked internationally, collecting information from countries such as France, the U.K., Japan, Sweden, Germany, Canada, and Finland, and found the same patterns over time quite clearly. "We see the evolution of stock ownership from individuals to intermediaries in many countries, and this trend does match their variations in tax policies," said Strebulaev.  

The paper also explains the creation of the mutual fund industry. The researchers discovered that as late as 1980, the mutual fund industry in the United States owned less than 4% of all stocks in the nation, today they are major owners of stocks. Most observers assume the industry grew to address people's need to diversify their portfolios, the press release said. "We show, however, that in various countries, mutual funds took off only when the 'defined-benefit' retirement plans were replaced with 'defined-contribution' plans — which allow people to choose their own providers," Strebulaev noted.   

"The same phenomenon happened in other countries as soon as retirement contribution plans were instituted. In countries where retirement contribution funds did not get instated, mutual funds never took off,” according to Strebulaev.  

The study's findings are not confined to stocks; the same changes happened in bond markets.  

More information is at http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/news/knowledgebase_newsltrs/2010/Dec.html.

Lifetime Income Options Scheduled for Review by IRS

Proposed regulations for lifetime income options are under review at the Internal Revenue Service.

In its response to President Obama’s January 18 Executive Order on ways government agencies can reduce the burden associated with regulations, the Treasury Department said it is reviewing certain regulations to determine whether any modifications could better achieve the objective of promoting retirement security. This initiative is expected to include projects that would facilitate the delivery of lifetime income in qualified plans and, to some extent, IRAs, and would reduce administrative burdens for retirement plan sponsors that would like to offer retirement income options in their plans.  

Within its plan “designed to create a defined method and schedule for identifying certain significant rules that are obsolete, unnecessary, excessively burdensome, or ineffective,” the Department also listed final regulations that would provide relief to employers facing financial difficulty from certain requirements under the existing regulations on safe harbor contributions to section 401(k) and (m) plans as scheduled for review in the next two years. This is one item identified by commenters responding to the Treasury Department’s Request for Information pertaining to the President’s executive order (see “ASPPA Recommends Streamlined Participant Communications“). The regulations would provide new flexibility to employers sponsoring certain safe harbor 401(k) plans by allowing them to respond to changes in their financial health by suspending required contributions.    

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

The Department outlined a plan for “creating a strong, ongoing culture of retrospective analysis.” As part of its plan, on an annual basis, members of the public will be provided with an opportunity to suggest to each bureau of the Department the specific regulations or other guidance that should be updated or amended as part of a targeted revision. In addition, every year, each bureau will conduct a retrospective review of 10% of its regulations. This ten percent review will continue on an annual basis in order for all Treasury regulations to be reviewed at least every ten years.  

The Department’s plan is here.

«