PSNC 2015: NQDC Plan Trends and Challenges

It’s an employee benefits topic that gets less press and touches relatively few people, but employers have a lot to gain by offering nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

Speaking at the 2015 PLANSPONSOR National Conference in Chicago, two experienced plan design experts suggested that more education for executives and key employees would lead to greater use of nonqualified deferred compensation (NQDC) plans.

According to Jeff Roberts, product consultant for executive deferred compensation at ADP, current participation among eligible executives and key employees in these plans is a bleak 43%. It is a stat Robert Kieckhefer, managing director of the Kieckhefer Group, has also seen, and one he feels can be vastly improved with a concerted educational effort from plan sponsors and their advisers.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

“Participation rates have always been a major challenge for nonqualified deferred compensation plans,” Roberts noted. “One thing that can help a lot to increase the number of executives and key employees using the NQDC plan is to just offer more education about the benefit. Getting someone from your own company to talk about how the benefit has worked for [him] can be hugely impactful.”

Kieckhefer suggested that getting an internal executive to talk about his positive experience deferring money into the plan will go a long way toward convincing other executives to at least consider directing compensation into the plan. Another way to improve participation is to make the case that the NQDC plan is not just a bonus or an extra benefit available for a company’s top employees—it will be a critical part of any highly compensated employees’ effort to improve their income replacement in retirement.

“I’ve seen research that suggests executives actively using NQDC plans anticipate fully 26% of their lifetime retirement income to be generated by the plan,” Roberts said. “In that sense, non-participation means missing out on more than a quarter of potential retirement income.”

Kieckhefer noted that plan sponsors can improve their own standing within a company by offering an NQDC plan to their firm’s leadership—and by effectively communicating the ability of the plans to help executives take control of their income taxes.

NEXT: A warning

 

 

 

“The best day to talk about them is April 15,” he said. “They just lost their breath and half of their annual income paying taxes. If they understand the benefits of deferral and carefully consider how they’ll put money into the plan and how they’ll take it out, you can eliminate much of the tax that is going to be paid.”

Roberts observed that, currently, only about four in 10 companies offering an NQDC plan to executives and key employees pay a match contribution into the plan. “I suspect that if that number were to go up, we would also see an increase in participation rates.”

One warning shared by both Roberts and Kieckhefer is that, while plan sponsors can gain a major reputational bump in their company by helping executives understand and leverage NQDCs, making a mistake in this area can be “a career-limiting experience.” This is especially true when it comes to choosing the recordkeeper for the NQDC plan—a party that has critical responsibility for the tax-efficient functioning of these plans.

“For NQDC plans, the rubber really meets the road with the recordkeeper and its ability to effectively time the movement of money and the release of distributions,” Kieckhefer explained. “There are absolutely huge tax implications that come along with mistakes in this area.”

As Roberts noted, “This is not 401(k) recordkeeping, so you must take care when selecting the recordkeeper.” (One resource in this area is the PLANSPONSOR NQDC Buyer’s Guide.)

“Administering an NQDC plan is very different, from the recordkeeping perspective, than running a qualified defined contribution plan,” he said. “If you can’t get specific information about [the provider’s] past experience doing this—setting the distributions and ensuring money is moving out of the plan in a tax-efficient way—that’s a problem.”

Other thoughts on NQDC plan trends and challenges shared by the panelists included the insight that these plans are not only for executives. Roberts pointed to a handful of clients that have set up NQDC plans as a means to improve key employee loyalty.

“I’ve worked with high-tech software companies recently, for example, where there is really strong competition for talent among the companies in the space,” he said. “You don’t have to limit this just to executives—hard to recruit groups can be included.”

 

 

Study: Many Older Households Lacking Savings

The GAO reports that maybe half of near-retirees have no money put aside.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has released a report indicating that many retirees and workers approaching retirement have limited financial resources. About half of households ages 55 and older are without  a 401(k) plan, an individual retirement account (IRA) or any other form of retirement savings.

Based largely on the GAO’s analysis of household financial data obtained on the Baby Boom generation from the Federal Reserve’s 2013 Survey of Consumer Finances, the report shows the financial status of the different segments of that population. For example, many older households without retirement savings have few other resources, such as a defined benefit (DB) plan or nonretirement savings, to draw on in retirement. Among households ages 55 and older, about 29% have neither retirement savings nor a traditional pension. However, households that have retirement savings generally have other resources to draw on, such as non-retirement savings and defined benefit plans.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Among households with some retirement savings, the median amount is about $104,000 for those ages 55 through 64 and $148,000 for households ages 65 through 74—the  equivalent of an inflation-protected annuity of $310 and $649 per month, respectively. Social Security provides most of the income for about half of households ages 65 and older.

According to the GAO’s resources for the study, which also included other surveys, academic studies of retirement savings adequacy and interviews with retirement experts about retirement readiness, about one-third to two-thirds of workers may be unable to maintain their pre-retirement standard of living. The GAO acknowledges, however, that arriving at a figure was difficult, as studies and surveys employed varying assumptions as to what that income goal require

Surveys showed that, compared with current retirees, workers ages 55 and older expect to retire later and that a higher percentage plan to work during retirement. However, one survey found that about half of retirees said they had retired earlier than planned due to health problems, changes at their workplace, or other factors, suggesting that many workers may overestimate their future retirement income and savings. Surveys have also found that people ages 55 through 64 are less confident about their finances in retirement than those aged 65 or older.

The GAO performed the study because of concerns over the growing aging population—the Census Bureau projects that the aged 65-and-older population will grow more than 50% between now and 2030—who may live longer but have inadequate or no retirement savings, and the uncertainty of Social Security’s long-term solvency.

The Department of Labor (DOL) reviewed the study and provided technical comments.

«