Deep Dive into DOL EBSA Enforcement Activities

On its website, the Department of Labor (DOL) reports its enforcement of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), via the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA), now extends to over nearly 681,000 retirement plans.

The EBSA’s mission to ensure the integrity of the private employee benefit plan system in the United States also applies to approximately 2.3 million health plans, and a similar number of other welfare benefit plans, such as those providing life or disability insurance. These plans cover about 143 million workers and their dependents and include assets of more than $8.7 trillion as of the end of 2015, EBSA reports. In 2017, EBSA recovered $1.1 billion in direct payment to plans, participants and beneficiaries.

According to the most recently published EBSA enforcement data, in 2017, the regulator closed 1,707 civil investigations, with 1,114 of those cases (65.3%) resulting in monetary compensation for plans or other corrective action. EBSA says this “exhibits its ability to effectively target ERISA violators in the employee benefit plan universe.”

Of the $682.3 million recovered in its investigations, EBSA helped terminated, vested participants in defined benefit plans collect benefits of $326.7 million due to them. In the enforcement data, EBSA notes that it “often pursues voluntary compliance as a means to correct violations and restore losses to employee benefit plans. However, in cases where voluntary compliance efforts have failed, or that involve issues for which voluntary compliance is not appropriate, EBSA forwards a recommendation to the Solicitor of Labor to initiate litigation.”

Notably, the data shows in 2017, 134 cases were referred for litigation, but the DOL only filed suit in 50 civil cases. This is because EBSA works with the Solicitor of Labor “to determine which cases are appropriate for litigation, considering the ability to obtain meaningful relief through litigation, cost of litigation, viability of other enforcement options, and agency enforcement priorities.” Of course, EBSA civil cases referred to the Solicitor’s office for litigation are often resolved with monetary payments, short of litigation.

Demonstrating EBSA’s broad authority, the data shows EBSA closed 307 criminal investigations last year, leading to the indictment of 113 persons for misdemeanor or felony crimes related to employee benefit plans. EBSA has responsibility to investigate potential violations of the criminal provisions of ERISA and those provisions of Title 18 of the United States Code that relate to employee benefit plans.

EBSA’s Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program (VFCP) and Delinquent Filer Voluntary Compliance Program (DFVCP) encourage the correction of violations of ERISA by providing significant incentives for fiduciaries and others to self-correct. In 2017, EBSA received 1,303 applications for the VFCP. The DFVCP encourages plan administrators to bring their plans into compliance with ERISA’s filing requirements. In 2017, some 22,139 annual reports (and $14.4 million) were received through this program.

Lessons from the data

These settlement numbers may seem quite large on first glance, but given the fact that there are more than 650,000 retirements plans alone under its jurisdiction, it is clear that EBSA faces an incredible regulatory task—one made all the more difficult by the complicated nature of even relatively straightforward benefit plans. Thus the regulator has to focus its investigative and enforcement resources in strategic and targeted way, explains David Levine, principal with Groom Law Group, in Washington, D.C.

As an example, he suggests one major regulatory priority in 2018 is “cracking down on the missing participants.” And it makes sense why EBSA would focus on this issue, given that it is more or less a universal issue across all types of plans, industries, regions, etc. Interestingly, this focus has been building for some time and continues under President Donald Trump, because while the top-level political leadership of DOL has changed, the rank and file remains, along with many of their ongoing projects.

“This is the center of the DOL world right now, as it relates to retirement plan sponsors, in my opinion,” Levine says. “Sure, there are other things going on, but enforcement is part of life and it does not change very much if it is a Democratic or Republican administration. You have got regional offices spread across the country, and they take guidance from the national office in Washington, but in reality they are relatively autonomous and move at their own pace.”

This is a big reason why, despite the Trump administration’s anti-regulatory agenda in so many other areas, when it comes to policing of retirement plans by the EBSA, the pace of settlements and corrections remains strong.

“I can tell you that the regional offices have been doing a lot of investigations, both on the retirement side and on the health care side as well,” Levine adds. “On the retirement side, again, there is a strong focus on missing participants, and EBSA is diving incredibly deep. They are auditing both defined contribution and defined benefit plans on this issue.”

Levine warned that many plan sponsors, when asked by the EBSA about their policies and procedures in this area, are taken aback, and they try to explain that they rely on the recordkeeper to search for missing participants.

“But as the EBSA will tell you, the responsibility ultimately sits with you as the plan fiduciary to find these people and implement your stated policies effectively,” Levine says. “There is Field Assistance Bulletin 2014-01 from the DOL that says, ‘Take these steps and you will be OK.’ But in the investigations they are going much further. I’ve had an EBSA regional office director recently tell us that a plan sponsor should have cold called a person that may have worked with a missing participant more than 20 years ago. Because these investigations get very timely and costly, I highly recommend going back and rechecking your fiduciary insurance. Make sure the policies are good and cover the costs of dealing with these investigations. You can end up spending a lot on lawyers.”

According to Jodi Epstein, a partner with Ivins, Phillips and Barker, other agencies and regulators with a strong degree of autonomy are also continuing enforcement pushes in a variety of areas under President Trump. She points to missing participant audit activity by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) as two leading examples.

“Yes it’s the DOL leading enforcement of retirement plans, but all the agencies are in on this,” she explains. “They are all thinking about missing participants and many other issues. They’re all putting out guidance that says one simple search for missing participants is not enough.”

Another important ongoing enforcement factor Epstein points out is that, for the first time in some time, DOL and IRS are hiring more enforcement and guidance development personnel.