Pre-Retiree Expectations Do Not Match Retiree Experience

Plans to retire later may not pan out, and workers may not realize what competing financial priorities they will have in retirement.

In research from the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies, retirees shared actionable insights about what they would have done differently in preparing themselves for retirement.

Reflecting on their working years, many retirees say they:

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

  • Wish that they would have saved more on a consistent basis (76%);
  • Wish they had been more knowledgeable about retirement saving and investing (68%);
  • Would have liked to have received more information and advice from their employers about how to achieve their retirement goals (53%);
  • Waited too long to concern themselves with saving and investing for retirement (48%); and
  • Should have relied more on outside experts to monitor and manage their retirement savings (41%).

The research found the actual experience of retirees does not match the expectations of pre-retirees. For example, 67% of pre-retirees ages 50 and older are planning to work past age 65 or do not plan to retire. Their expected retirement age is 67 (median). However, the majority of retirees (60%) retired sooner than planned, 66% of them did so for employment-related reasons such as organizational changes, job loss, unhappiness with job/career or received a buyout. Twenty-seven percent did so due to health reasons and 11% for family responsibilities (e.g., becoming a caregiver). Only 16% retired because they found they had saved enough or received a windfall.

Among retirees who retired later than planned, most (61%) did so for financial reasons or the need for benefits. Forty-four percent say they delayed retirement for reasons of enjoyment.

NEXT: Income in retirement

Retirees (89%) and pre-retirees (83%) most frequently cite Social Security as a current source/expected source of income in retirement. As an indicator of the shifting retirement landscape, retirees (42%) are more likely to cite income from a company-funded pension plan than pre-retirees (31%). On the other hand, pre-retirees (67%) are more likely than retirees (37%) to expect income from self-funded retirement accounts such as 401(k)s, 403(b)s, and IRAs. In addition, 39% of pre-retirees are expecting income from working in retirement compared to only 6% of retirees.

Retirees (61%) and pre-retirees (37%) most frequently cite Social Security as their expected primary source of income in retirement; however, the difference in response levels is significant. Pre-retirees (25%) are much more likely than retirees (10%) to expect income from 401(k)s, 403(b)s, and IRAs as their primary source of income in retirement. Eleven percent of pre-retirees are expecting to primarily rely on income from continuing to work in retirement.

Eighty-nine percent of retirees are currently receiving Social Security benefits. The median age at which they started receiving benefits is 62. Retirees report having a total annual household income of $32,000 (estimated median); however, a wide disparity exists between those who are married ($48,000 estimated median) and those who are unmarried ($19,000).

By comparison, pre-retirees report higher levels of income ($71,000) including those who are married ($84,000) and unmarried ($35,000).

The total household savings in retirement accounts is $135,000 (estimated median) among pre-retirees; however, the survey found a wide disparity between those who are married ($177,000) and unmarried ($48,000). Among retirees there is also a wide disparity in retirement savings between the married ($225,000) and unmarried ($53,000).

NEXT: Competing financial priorities

"Today's retirees envision spending decades in retirement, albeit with limited savings and means," says Catherine Collinson, president of TCRS. Among retirees, their greatest fears about retirement are declining health that requires long-term care and that Social Security will cease to exist in the future (44%). Among pre-retirees, the most frequently cited fear is outliving their savings and investments (43%).

Retirees are expecting a long retirement of 28 years (median), with 41% expecting a retirement of more than 30 years. Retirees plan to live to age 90 (median), although it should be noted that 43% of retirees are not sure how long they plan to live.

Few retirees (16%) strongly agree that they built a large enough retirement nest egg. Twenty percent say they are continuing to save for retirement.

Retirees identify a myriad of competing financial priorities including just getting by / covering basic living expenses (42%), paying health care expenses (37%), paying off mortgages (21%), creating an inheritance or financial legacy (16%), funding long-term care expenses (9%), contributing to an education fund (6%) and funding assisted living expenses (4%). One-quarter of retirees cite paying off credit card debt as a financial priority. 

"One of the most important things within reach that retirees and pre-retirees can do is formulate a financial plan to identify opportunities, vulnerabilities, and ways to address them," says Collinson. The study found only 10% of retirees and 14% of pre-retirees have a written strategy which may include government retirement benefits (i.e., Social Security and Medicare), on-going living expenses, a budget, savings and income needs, health care costs and other factors.

Collinson adds that today’s workers have very different expectations about when and how they will retire when compared to those already in retirement, expecting to gradually transition into retirement by reducing hours or working in a different capacity. But, few pre-retirees in the study say that their employers currently offer this as an option. Moreover, while most employers sponsor plans and offer benefits to help their employees save for retirement, many pre-retirees say they are offered assistance such as financial education, counseling or seminars to help them transition into retirement. “By updating business practices and offering retirement transition assistance, employers can play a valuable role in helping their employees retire while, at the same time, optimizing succession planning and overall workforce management,” she tells PLANADVISER.

The research report is here.

Talking Industry Trends With SunTrust Solutions Director

Mark Jones worked for some 30 years in the 401(k) industry before retiring from Invesco; now he’s back in the business, helping run employee benefit solutions sales for SunTrust Bank. 

Advisers in the 401(k) industry will likely know of both Invesco and SunTrust—two providers serving large numbers of defined contribution (DC) retirement plans and institutional clients primarily with investment products and retirement plan recordkeeping, respectively.

The two firms concentrate on different markets—Invesco focused more on large plan clients and SunTrust focused more on the middle market. This gives Mark Jones, currently SunTrust’s director of employee benefits solutions, some important insights into the current sales and service trends making their way down market.  

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

“I’ve been in the 401(k) business for my entire adult career really, starting at Invesco in the early 1980s,” Jones explains. “I was the 80th employee there, and now they have thousands of employees, so it’s grown into an entirely different company. Back then, we were still building the DC business that we’re all familiar with today.”

Jones likens the effort of creating early 401(k) products at Invesco to “working from the spare parts.”

“Back then we were really thinking of retirement plans from the standpoint of a mutual fund company,” Jones adds. “Over 20 years the business grew and matured significantly, before we sold it to Merrill Lynch in about 2007. Then I spent two years helping to transition the business.” (SunTrust company statistics here.)

Jones retired for a few years after the transition period, he explains, but SunTrust subsequently asked him to “come out of retirement and help them grow the business. So I’ve got a lot of history in the 401(k) realm and a nice second act going on here. I was tired of being retired, you could say.”

NEXT: Some things change, some stay the same

Jones says there has been tremendous change in his time in the industry—especially in the last five or 10 years.

“This has put a real premium on skilled operations people,” Jones says. “One of my former colleagues who ran operations for me at Invesco, and she’s since spent time with ING and Fidelity and T. Rowe Price, has gone on to become a successful independent consultant. She tells me all the time how much people are still struggling with the technology and finding the right model as a retirement plan recordkeeper.”

Jones, like others, predicts industry consolidation will continue as clients of smaller and smaller size look for the types of plan sponsor and participant support services more frequently delivered to large and mega-sized plans.

“I think the consolidation is clearly going to start to ramp up even more—acquisitions right and left,” he predicts. “The big are going to get bigger, and that’s a reason why I enjoy working for SunTrust. We have the scale and we’re ready to seize a niche—providing a higher level of service to a smaller plan. That’s an area of service that I think we will see getting lost, to some degree, in the big consolidations.”

Jones suggests another trend to consider is “what’s going on with third-party administrators [TPAs] on the small end of the market.”

“All of those firms, frankly, were started by people at or very near retirement age,” Jones says, “and they’re struggling to some extent because their businesses are being whittled away by larger providers. And this is happening at the same time that they want to monetize and retire—that’s another piece fueling the likely surge in acquisitions. Our industry has by no means stopped evolving.”

NEXT: Be careful with branding  

Speaking with PLANADVISER, Jones frequently mentioned the important role consultants and advisers are playing in the ongoing development of the 401(k) industry, both in terms of client service trends and how retirement plan providers do their work on the back end.

“There are some consultants out there who have some tremendous insights into what is going on and where the game is heading,” Jones suggests. “They’re looking at aligning sales processes and making it all really efficient on the delivery side. Others are more known for designing new sales and service models that are really compelling for the front office.”

In terms of his personal approach to piloting sales and branding efforts in the current market environment, Jones says he has something of an advantage in that SunTrust “likes being in the middle space. We’re nationally chartered, of course, but we still have that identity as a true regional bank—our footprint goes from Baltimore to Miami, essentially. We really play into that marketplace and we really target serving a more modest size company—and to bring all the resources to bear that bigger companies would get.”

Jones says any provider in the 401(k) space today, whether an advisory firm or a mutual fund company, must “be careful with their branding.”

“It takes resources to build and maintain the brand,” Jones says. “Something else I’ll say is that we’ve really tried, at SunTrust, to embody the purpose-driven attitude that clients today are looking for. Clients think about our role as helping their own people light the way to financial security, and we take that tag line seriously.”

NEXT: Quarterbacking opportunity abounds 

Jones says the focus of his earlier work with Invesco was focused on large clients, so there were always four or five HR and finance staffers at each client meeting whose sole job it was to focus on the 401(k) plan.

“That’s fundamentally a different relationship and a different market from serving a client with one or two HR directors and not much else,” Jones explains. “The clients we serve at SunTrust, being in the middle market, really expect us to come in and help quarterback things for the retirement plan.”

There is a lot of complacency that’s out there, Jones adds, “because nothing bad has happened yet for a given prospect, so we are also focused on educating them about the things that can happen if and when the DOL comes knocking. When we take over a new account, getting the plan in shape is our first priority. We can sell on the fact that as a bank, we are enormously regulated, and we have an army of people to help us think about risks, and we can really quarterback this process for our clients.”

From that perspective, Jones agrees with arguments that increasing regulatory pressure for 401(k) plan advisers and providers could be a good thing. “The sponsors are focusing more every day on the regulatory exposure they face and they’re looking for strong partners, all up and down the market, to help take care of that,” he says. “That’s one of the biggest things that struck me, going from the big plan sponsor to the small plan sponsor—just realizing how much help these guys want down in the lower market.”

Jones concludes that the increasing prevalence of state-run retirement plans for private sector workers may also end up being a boon to private providers: “We’re watching it closely, of course, but it’s hard to say still what the ultimate impact will be. In my 30 years in the industry I’ve seen these things develop and unfold time and again, and often it ends up being in a way that was not at all anticipated beforehand. So that’s how I’m thinking about all of the regulatory pressure out there.”

“I can tell you that people who work for smaller companies are looking for a better opportunity for their employees,” he concludes “An interesting line of argument is that it could be good for everyone in the provider space if all these new people start to save and get interested in long-term investing. There’s more opportunity to manage that money and help people improve their outcomes.” 

«