Pension Funding in July Mostly Flat, With Some Dips

Equities bolstered corporate pension funds for the most part last month, offsetting a decline in discount rates.

The funded status of corporate pensions stayed steady in July, but some pension trackers saw their first declines in months. Across the board, strong investment returns were offset by a decline in discount rates used to value pension liabilities.  

Equities were strong in July, although the month saw a decline in tech and artificial intelligence stocks, especially the Magnificent 7. Tech darlings like Nvidia, Apple and others peaked mid-month, with some large- and mega-cap tech stocks declining by double digits in July.  

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Most investment consultants and research firms that track the funded status of corporate pension plans found that funded status remained fairly flat or declined in some cases. For trackers that found an increase in funded status, the increases were small compared with previous months.  

October Three, which tracks the funded status of two hypothetical plans—Plan A, a 60/40 portfolio, and Plan B, a 20/80 portfolio—found that Plan A saw a one-percentage-point decline in funded status but is up eight percentage points in 2024. Plan B saw a decline of a fraction of a percentage point, and funding for that plan remains up 2% for the year.  

Looking ahead, October Three’s Brian Donohue wrote that he expects pension sponsors to use discount rates in the range of 5.0% to 5.3% to measure pension liabilities in the near term. Plans that are underfunded will likely require sharp increases in required contributions over the next two years, Donahue wrote. 

For companies considering a pension risk transfer, the time to do so is sooner rather than later, according to Donohue. “Long-term interest rates have fallen half a percent since the end of April, pushing [pension risk transfer] costs higher,” Donohue says. “If this trend continues, it would be cheaper to settle pension liabilities sooner rather than later. … In addition, the PRT market appears to exhibit ‘seasonality’ in recent years, with PRT transactions executed earlier in the calendar year tending to produce better PRT pricing for plan sponsors. Which is to say that it may be difficult to generate insurer interest and attractive pricing toward the end of 2024, as insurers fill their books for the year.” 

Minimal Declines 

According to Mercer, which tracks the funding level of corporate plans of companies within the S&P Composite 1500 Index, the funded status of these plans decreased by one percentage point in July to 108%, resulting in the funding surplus of these plans decreasing by $8 billion to $128 billion at the end of July.  

The funded status of the largest 100 corporate defined benefit plans remained unchanged in July, staying steady at 103.5%, according to the Milliman 100 Pension Funding Index.  

The funded status of plans tracked by LGIM America’s Pension Solutions Monitor declined less than half a percentage point, to 109.5% at the end of July from 109.9% in June. The PSM tracks a hypothetical 50/50 equity/bond portfolio. The monitor found that equities increased 1.6%, while plan discount rates decreased 30 basis points. Assets increased 2.5%, and liabilities increased 2.9%, resulting in a 0.4-percentage-point decline in funded status. 

Insight Investment reported that the funded status of tracked plans rose 0.6 percentage points to 114.9% during the month. Assets returned 3.0%, while liabilities rose 2.5%. Discount rates, due to a change in the risk-free rate, decreased by 15 basis points to 5.18% in the month of July from 5.33% in June.  

Wilshire, which tracks the funded status of corporate plans of companies in the S&P 500 Index through the FTSE Pension Liability Index, finds that the funded status of these plans increased by 0.1 percentage points in July, to 101.5%. Pension assets increased 2.3% in value, while liabilities increased by 2.2%, resulting in a 0.1-point increase in funded status.  

WTW’s Pension Finance Index, which tracks the funded status of a hypothetical plan, declined for the first time in six months. The index declined by 0.6 points at the end of July to 116.3%, a result of pension liabilities outpacing investment returns due to declines in discount rates.  

Discount Rates Fall, With Rate Cuts on the Horizon 

Discount rates used to value pension liabilities declined in the month, and Treasury yields also fell with the expectations that a Federal Reserve rate cut is on the horizon, according to investment consultant Agilis’ monthly pension briefing.  

While July was a positive month for pension plan funded status, despite decreasing discount rates, August has so far been off to a rocky start,” said Michael Clark, managing director of Agilis, in a statement. “With some poor economic data posting, most notably unemployment, markets were down significantly to start the month, and rates were down close to 0.50% on the anticipation of a large Fed Funds Rate cut in September.” 

Discount rates measured by the Mercer Yield Curve for plans within the S&P 1500 Index decreased to 5.25% from 5.48%. 

“Pension funded status for the S&P 1500 decreased one percent in July, driven by a drop in interest rates following the latest Fed meeting and indications that a rate cut may be coming soon,” said Matt McDaniel, a partner in Mercer, in a statement.  

Investors are expecting a rate cut at the next Fed meeting in September, with most economists expecting a cut of 0.5 percentage points to the federal funds rate. 

“July’s funded status showed a muted change due to nearly equivalent positive returns for both assets and liabilities,” said Ned McGuire, managing director at Wilshire, in a statement. “Corporate bond yields, used to value corporate pension liabilities, fell to their lowest level since the first quarter of 2024, driven by expectations of U.S. rate cuts from the Federal Reserve.” 

CITs ‘Inch Past’ Mutual Funds to Become Lead Target-Date Investment Vehicle

June 2024 data from Morningstar show collective investment trust target-dates make up about 50.5% of TDF assets.

Collective investment trusts, popular for defined contribution retirement plans, have been gaining ground on mutual funds in the target-date market for years. Now they have overtaken them as measured by total TDF assets, according to Morningstar data posted Thursday.

As of the end of June, CITs accounted for $1.9 trillion of the $3.8 trillion of total target-date assets, accounting for 50.5%, according to Morningstar. That shows CITs “inched past” mutual funds, which account for about 49.5% of TDF market share after leading in the TDF space since they were introduced in the 1990s.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

This moment has been in the making for nearly a decade, with mutual funds steadily losing ground after holding 71% of the market in 2015. The trend “isn’t slowing,” according to the write-up from Megan Pacholok, a senior analyst at Morningstar.

“Target-date CITs have been capturing most of the target-date net flows since at least 2020,” she wrote. “Flows aren’t the only indicator of their success. Based on reported data, more than USD $22.6 billion in target-date mutual funds converted to CITs in 2023.”

Morningstar’s analysis included a breakdown of the five target-date series with the most CIT assets. They are:

Series

Assets (Billions)

Vanguard Target Retirement

$739

BlackRock LifePath Index

$275

T. Rowe Price Retirement

$218

State Street Target Retirement

$168

Fidelity Freedom Index

$68

Source: Morningstar

The rise of CITs does not indicate the end of the hold mutual funds have on qualified retirement plan investing, with Pacholok writing that “target-date mutual funds still hold a large part of the market.”

Mutual funds also still held a steady lead in overall 401(k) plan assets as of March 31, according to the Investment Company Institute. Of $7.8 trillion held in 401(k)s, mutual funds accounted for $5.1 trillion, or 65%.

CITs often offer lower fees for DC plans when compared to mutual funds, in part because they are not regulated by the Investment Company Act of 1940. CIT fees are negotiated with the plan providers and have provided cheaper fees for large plans for years, while also offering attractive pricing for plans further down market as the market has developed.

CITs are also overseen by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, not the Securities and Exchange Commission. Gary Gensler, chairman of the SEC, has made comments suggesting CITs are being reviewed to ensure they are subject to an appropriate amount of regulatory oversight—noting in May that that “rules for these funds lack limits on illiquid investments and minimum levels of liquid assets. There is no limit on leverage, requirement for regular reporting on holdings to investors, or requirement for an independent board.”

There is no question, however, of CITs’ popularity among retirement plan fiduciaries and investment managers. After a steady lobbying effort by industry players, committees in both the House and Senate have passed bills to allow CITs to be used in 403(b) plans, which at the moment is not allowed. That would extend their use even further into nonprofit and other retirement plan investment menus.

Morningstar’s Pacholok also pointed out a “shadow side” to CITs: They are less transparent than mutual funds because they do not need to disclose their investment managers, their experience or if they have joined or left the investment strategy team.

“It’s impossible to assess a management team without this information,” she wrote.

Despite lack of regulatory requirement to do so, 88 out of 141 target-date CIT strategies disclose manager names within Morningstar’s database, according to the firm. Meanwhile, plan sponsors and their advisers, of course, are held to fiduciary standards under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, and therefore are ultimately responsible for the investment options they select for participants.

«