PANC 2017: Team Structures

How to best serve your clients and know when to grow your practice.
At the “Team Structures” session at the 2017 PLANADVISER National Conference, Thursday, panelists discussed the importance of having senior team members serve clients but also having junior members attend meetings to ensure continuity of service. Additionally, they explored various strategies retirement plan advisers can take to grow their business.

“Growth is a good problem to have,” said Rich Eagar, a retirement consultant with Ascende Wealth Adivsers, Inc., the retirement consulting division of EPIC Insurance Brokers & Consultants. He suggested that when a retirement advisory practice first begins to think about division of labor that the leaders “find out who likes to do what—who likes to handle investments, who is strong in pension work,” etc.

Equally important, Eagar continued, is “making sure more than one person is assigned to a client” so service is uninterrupted. Ascende assigns a senior adviser to each account, to be the “face of that account,” Eagar said. Partnering with the senior adviser is a director of retirement, who is responsible for generating progress reports, he said. When the senior adviser meets with the plan sponsor client, he is always accompanied by three to five associates.

In terms of growing a retirement advisory practice, Joseph Lee, senior vice president and head of retirement platforms and strategy at First Eagle Investment Management, referenced a model that was introduced by psychologist Bruce Tuckman in 1965: forming, storming, norming and performing.

In the forming stage, Lee said, the team leader is driving growth, and the average assets under advisement (AUA) are less than $1 billion. In the storming stage, when assets have reached $5 billion, other members of the team are taking ownership of plan sponsor clients’ day-to-day business, giving the team leader the leeway to handle conflicts, he said.

In the norming stage, when assets are approaching $25 billion, “responsibilities have become clearer, and people are running with it,” Lee said. Finally, in the performing stage, with assets now at $350 billion or more, “everyone on the team is running at full speed and thinking about the next win, with the mindset that attracting new clients is everyone’s responsibility,” he said. “However, according to research by Ann Schleck & Co., only 17% of teams are elite, running at top efficiency.”

NEXT: Finding the right people
For any individual adviser looking to grow his business, building a team is the inevitable next step, Lee said. “There is a cap to the number of plans an adviser can handle—but if they have a team, they can be more effective.” If you are an adviser in the early stages of expanding your business, Lee recommended “build[ing] a team to fulfill strengths you don’t have. It’s really about finding the right people to do the right tasks for the right reasons.”

Not every advisory practice has the same areas of focus, Lee said. “Figure out your business development model—how you differentiate yourself,” he said. For instance, if your practice distinguishes itself by offering one-on-one meetings with retirement plan participants, it obviously makes sense to hire staff who can handle employee education, he said.

And don’t offer the same services to every client, he said. Rather, “tier your client service model. You have to be constantly planning and executing in order to grow.”

Eagar added, “I like to keep things as simple as possible. Ask yourself what you are looking to get out of growth efforts. What do you need help with? Growing for the sake of growing is not as important as becoming more efficient.”

So, where does Ascende get its ideas for how to grow and when to expand? “We ask new hires for new ideas,” Eagar said. “We also realize that if the business is getting to the point where we can’t handle the volume, we need help.” Further, Ascende is constantly on top of emerging industry trends and thinking about new services to offer, or areas of strength where the firm could hone its skills even more soundly, Eagar said.

NEXT: Centralized vs. satellite office control
Certainly, one of the most important questions for a retirement advisory practice that has expanded into two or more teams in different locations is what functions to retain at the home office, what to give the satellite offices leeway to control, and what could possibly be outsourced, noted Michael Clark, a consultant with Keiron Partners and moderator of the panel.

Ascende does not have a hard and fast rule when it comes to the investment lineups, Eagar said. “We give people choices. We provide thought leadership on investments, under the roof of pre-screens. However, we offer advisers choice and allow them to add value.”

At First Eagle, the division of labor among the teams “is practice by practice, firm by firm,” Lee said. “Someone might be focused on compliance, for example. It is all about leveraging and finding the right partner.”

Clark asked the two panelists, when do they know the time is right to add team members. 
Lee said First Eagle studies the service model, to see what takes the most time. Management then ask themselves, is there a better way? he continued. If they decide it makes sense to add to the team, “we look to hire people who have the skills and the desire to do that job—and take the practice to the next level.”

Recently, though, First Eagle has been examining its return on investment (ROI) and has concluded that, rather than hiring new staff members, the practice “can be more efficient by leveraging technology,” Lee said.

Pre-Retirees Want Lifetime Income Guarantees

A survey finds only 22% of Americans have worked with a financial adviser to figure out how much income they will need in retirement.

Americans recognize the importance of having a secure source of retirement income they can’t outlive, according to the 2017 TIAA Lifetime Income Survey.

More than half (56%) of Americans surveyed who are not retired say the most important goal for a retirement plan is to guarantee money every month to cover living expenses. Given a choice between receiving a $500,000 lump sum at retirement or getting $2,700/month for life, 62% would choose the monthly income.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

However, even though Americans want steady income throughout their retirement, only 32% of those surveyed say their retirement plan includes access to products that provide monthly income in retirement. Among those who don’t have access or aren’t sure if they have access to such products, half would like such an option.

The majority of American adults who are not retired support legislative changes that would help them get more information about, and access to, lifetime income products within their workplace retirement plans. Seventy-one percent support legislation to make it easier for employer-based retirement plans to include these products, such as annuities, as investment options; and 67% favor legislation that requires retirement account statements to include an estimate of monthly income in retirement.

Though many Americans would like to receive access to retirement income they cannot outlive, only half (49%) of non-retirees are familiar with annuities according to the survey. Only 13% of non-retirees have purchased an annuity, though another 31% say they plan to do so.

“Americans should give annuities a second—or, in many cases, a first—look because they can provide the reliability and security that is so critical as the average length of retirement grows,” Pressman says. “The more you know about annuities, the better you can evaluate your options and select the investment products that best suit your financial needs and goals.”

NEXT: Participants have misconceptions about other investments

Individuals may not be choosing annuities because they mistakenly think other investments offer a similar guarantee. Nearly two-thirds (63%) of non-retirees who are invested in a target-date fund expect that it will provide a guaranteed monthly paycheck for the length of their retirement, and 70% would like their target-date fund to offer this benefit, according to the survey. 

However, the reality is that most target-date funds do not include this feature now, though recent innovations have resulted in some new investment options that provide lifetime income within the target-date structure. In the future, more participants will be able to access these types of investments.

Securing a source of guaranteed monthly income could ease non-retired Americans’ concerns about their retirement savings outlook.

  • 61% worry about outliving their savings;
  • 68% worry they will not save enough for retirement;
  • 67% are concerned about guaranteeing they will have a steady retirement income no matter how long they live; and
  • 69% are concerned about changes to Social Security.

While annuities can offer peace of mind to individuals by covering their fixed monthly expenses, people often draw upon other savings or supplemental income for discretionary spending. Most non-retirees surveyed plan to augment their retirement income with part-time (52%) or full-time (11%) work, which can provide extra income for travel, hobbies and other retirement activities.

NEXT: Steps for improving retirement readiness

TIAA suggests steps both employers and individuals can take to help improve retirement readiness and outcomes:

  • Increase the retirement savings rate. The survey shows 73% of Americans are saving less than 11% of their current annual income (including contributions by their employer). Most experts recommend saving 10% to 15% of their annual income for retirement.
  • Employers can help retirement savings rates by adding features such as auto-enrollment and auto-escalation to their retirement plans. The survey finds that a majority of Americans who are not retired would support legislation to make it easier for employers to add auto-enrollment (71%) and auto-escalation (64%) to their plans.
      
  • Ensure employees understand how much income they will need to replace during retirement. Most experts agree that people should aim to replace 70% to 100% of their pre-retirement income to live comfortably during retirement, but only one-quarter (24%) of non-retirees think they will need at least 70%. These findings underscore an opportunity for employers to educate their employees about how to determine the income replacement ratio they should target for retirement.
      
  • Ensure employees analyze how savings will translate into retirement income. Slightly more than half (58%) of non-retirees have analyzed how their savings will translate into monthly income during retirement, with men far more likely to have done so than women (70% versus 48%, respectively). This is a critical step in the retirement planning process, and the earlier this analysis can be done, the better. Fewer than half of those who completed this analysis did so at least 20 years in advance of their planned retirement.

The survey also finds that only 22% have worked with a financial adviser or professional to run their retirement numbers. It may be worthwhile for those who have done the analysis on their own to consult with a financial adviser and discuss the results within the context of their overall financial picture and retirement goals.

“The prospect of saving enough money to last through a potentially long retirement can be overwhelming, even for those who feel financially secure in their pre-retirement life,” Pressman says. “Ensuring all Americans have access to better retirement plans—notably, plans that can produce a stream of income that is guaranteed to last a lifetime—will go a long way in helping to bring the peace of mind we all deserve in retirement.”

For more information about the 2017 TIAA Lifetime Income Survey, read the survey results summary.

«