PANC 2015: Recordkeeper Partners Critical to Success

Two senior retirement industry executives—one from an advisory firm and one from a recordkeeper—discuss how the two types of service providers can work together for better plan sponsor outcomes.

According to Joe Ready, executive vice president of Wells Fargo Institutional Retirement and Trust, dedicated retirement plan advisers have probably their most effective service delivery partner in their recordkeeper. And if they don’t, it’s time for them to find another recordkeeper.

“Mutual agreement up front and mutual service from the recordkeeper and the adviser are foundational to good plan sponsor outcomes,” Ready said during the first day of the 2015 PLANADVISER National Conference in Orlando. “When the recordkeeper supports the adviser and the adviser knows the recordkeeper inside and out, it absolutely leads to better ideas and better best practices.”

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Working together throughout the process of running a retirement plan will certainly bring better outcomes and increased satisfaction from the plan sponsor, agreed Randy Long, managing principal at SageView Advisory Group. He observed that, earlier in his career, winning a new advisory client almost always meant converting them to a new recordkeeper.

“Today the process essentially works in reverse,” he explained. “Starting in the last 10 or 15 years, the industry has really evolved and we’re commonly winning new clients through our recordkeeper. It’s a client on the recordkeeping platform looking for a new adviser, which only makes things easier from the participant perspective.”

The benefits that arise from close coordination between adviser and recordkeeper are myriad, the pair explained. From greater plan management efficiency to more advanced reporting and faster data updates, a skilled recordkeeper/adviser team can really turn up the heat on plan viewability and performance.

For those advisers who feel it’s important to maintain a coolheaded distance from the recordkeeper in order to promote an image of independence and transparency among clients, Long says that’s great, but this doesn’t mean the adviser has to coordinate less with the recordkeeper or be a less effective partner.

“You can maintain your independence while presenting services in a highly coordinated and effective way,” Long said. “That’s something we have strived pretty successfully to do, I think. Just remember, the end goal is always to put the client first and keep the client happy, both for adviser and recordkeeper.”

NEXT: (Careful) collaboration is king 

While more effective partnering between recordkeeper and adviser can improve efficiency for all plan stakeholders, Long and Ready agreed that problems can arise, especially when duties are not carefully and clearly divided among service providers.

“For success with adviser and recordkeeper, keeping the duties and responsibilities clear will always be a key effort,” Ready said. “Successful collaboration means maximizing use of data by all parties and proactively creating the best relationships we can among the sponsor, the adviser and the recordkeeper.”

Ready said one area in particular where advisers and recordkeepers should work more aggressively together “is around the cost-versus-value question,” referring to the ongoing market trends squeezing advisory and recordkeeping pricing closer to unsustainable levels from a practice management perspective.   

“I don’t think recordkeepers or advisers have done a good job on navigating and taking charge of this cost-versus-value question,” Ready explained. “Neither side has done a particularly good job enumerating the value of our service deliverables. Instead we have focused on rolling out shiny new tools and services to try and justify our pricing. It’s unsustainable when you think long term and our challenge, industry wide, is to do a better job demonstrating our costs and how this relates to the value that is delivered.”

Long agreed: “If you think about what a given participant actually gets for his $100 or so in recordkeeping costs each year, it’s a huge value. Think about everything else you spend $100 on in a year and it’s probably worth a lot less than access to investments, asset custody and all the other services a recordkeeper actually provides.”

Both speakers concluded that recordkeepers, with their troves of data and ability to pull reports on demand, are particularly well-positioned to help advisers map out the value they are delivering to a plan. As Long explained, they can help the adviser identify and broadcast gains in key plan performance metrics experienced by the typical client, for example.

“We just haven’t connected the costs to the outcomes,” Long said. “We all know a $5 per year recordkeeping service is not going to deliver strong value, but how can we make clients better understand this? It’s a problem for advisers and recordkeepers to tackle together.”

On the Minds of Advisers in Natixis Survey

Advisers weigh in on market volatility, a possible rate hike by the Fed, the increasing rise of robo-advice and the dumb things investors do.

Market volatility is the leading challenge to the growth of advisers’ businesses, according to findings in the Natixis 2015 Financial Advisor Survey, sparking them to use investment strategies that can provide stability and balance risk in up and down markets. More than three-quarters of advisers (77%) agree that traditional portfolio allocation—the classic 60% stocks/40% bonds—is not the best way to pursue return and manage investment risk for clients.

About two-thirds (65%) say traditional diversification and portfolio construction techniques should be replaced with new approaches to achieve results. A majority of advisers (81%) are employing alternatives—hedge funds, private equity, commodities or long-short funds—in client portfolios. Most often, with 62% of advisers employing the strategy, alternatives are used for investors with assets of $1 million to $4 million.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Active strategies have the lead, with advisers investing 65% of clients’ money in active strategies and 35% in passive assets, such as index funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs). When they do choose passive investments, advisers cite the following reasons: simplified access to efficient asset classes (62%), low fees (62%) and higher performance after fees (38%). But actively managed assets trump passive, they say, for taking advantage of short-term market movements (74%), providing risk-adjusted returns (67%) and generating stable income (62%).

NEXT: The biggest loser, in the face of an interest-rate hike.

Advisers surveyed believe a rise in interest rates will affect capital markets negatively, with bond markets taking the biggest hit (58%), followed by stock values (48%). In the face of rising rates, the top portfolio adjustments advisers say they’ll recommend to clients are to shorten the duration of clients’ bond portfolios as interest rates rise (65%), reduce bond holdings (42%), raise stock allocations (38%) and increase allocations to alternative assets (34%).

The robo-advice model represents real competition, according to advisers surveyed by Natixis, and they acknowledge it will encourage them to step up their game. More than half (56%) say the emergence of so-called "robo-advice" will have a long-term effect on the industry, and 46% say robo-advice is a threat to their business models. But more than two-thirds (70%) say the rise of automated, online advice will improve traditional advisers’ performance, requiring them to work harder to demonstrate their value to their clients.

The competitive advantage? Offering personal advice. Eighty percent of advisers believe robo-advice cannot deliver the tactical asset allocation needed, especially during down markets, and 91% say clients who use robo-advice will cash out during volatile times because they won’t get the individual attention financial advisers can deliver. But robo-advice could have a place in an adviser’s practice, and 54% say they believe they could compete better and cater to less affluent clients by introducing a robo-advice arm to their business.

Typical investors are making seven major financial mistakes, advisers say, from making emotional investment decisions, to focusing on short-term market noise and changes, to failing to have a financial plan.

Natixis conducted an online survey in June of 300 financial advisers in the United States, who collectively oversee a total of nearly $11 billion in client assets, as part of a larger global study of 2,400 advisers in 14 countries and territories in Asia, Europe, Latin America, the United Kingdom and the Americas.

«