OCIO Channel Gains Steam

Both defined benefit (DB) and defined contribution (DC) plans can benefit from outsourcing chief investment officer functions, says Debra Woida, delegated investment services head at Towers Watson.

Woida told PLANADVISER that her company has seen a 40% pickup in outsourced chief investment officer (OCIO) business in the last six months. The majority of the business involves full-fund outsourcing assignments, though a few clients arranged partial outsourcing to manage specialty hedge fund, private market and alternative investments.   

Those numbers match up with wider industry trends. In fact, financial services consultants expect 18.5% of assets under management by 2016 will come from outsourced chief investment officer (OCIO) engagements, up from 12% in 2012, according to a research report from Cerulli Associates.  

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Woida points to a number of factors fueling interest in outsourced investment management. One of the most commonly cited for private DB plans is a lack of time and specialty expertise among internal resources.

“A plan’s investment committee is usually made up of some really smart and dedicated people, but they can only be part-time investment managers. They have other responsibilities within their firm,” Woida says. “We are seeing more and more plans that want full-time, active investment management at the plan level.”

In some cases, pension plans have a team of talented investment managers but lack a top-level leader with the skill to coordinate plan-wide investment efforts. Other plans turn to OCIOs to fix compliance and governance issues.

“Each individual manager might be very good,” Woida says, “but if you don’t have that top-level coach seeing the big picture, you won’t always get the outcome you want.”

One surprising reason cited by Woida is that DB plan sponsors often consider outsourcing investment management when a pension’s funded status improves—not just when investment performance lags.

“Plan sponsors are, in general, seeing much better funding levels than they were a year or 18 months ago,” Woida says. “Now, with interest rates bouncing around and ongoing talk of the Fed taper, they’re trying to figure out how to lock that in and cut out some of the market volatility. The OCIO model is one way to do this.”

The OCIO model is typically applied somewhat differently in DC plans. That’s because DC plan participants are responsible for making their own investment decisions–freeing up consulting resources to focus on governance and compliance.

Woida says the presence of an internal CIO need not preclude the outsourcing of investment functions.

“Oftentimes a CIO has many different responsibilities beyond the retirement plan,” Woida says. “In that case they seem to embrace the idea of outsourcing some partial investment functions. Instead of focusing all day on developing investment committee reports and ensuring plan governance, a CIO can focus on setting wider investment strategies.”

Most Workers Value Income Projections

A new survey finds that most employees consider retirement income projections helpful.

The survey from the LIMRA Secure Retirement Institute (SRI) shows nine in 10 U.S. workers see such projections as somewhat or very helpful. The findings also describe employees’ top concerns about the validity of, and calculations behind, income projections.

“Providing an estimate of what their monthly income will be in retirement has been well received by most U.S. workers,” says Alison Salka, corporate vice president and research director for the LIMRA SRI in Windsor, Connecticut. “The survey suggests that workers are interested in a clear explanation of how the estimates were calculated and need additional information to provide context to the projections.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Forty-five percent of workers who find retirement income projections less than helpful say they either doubt the accuracy of the results or don’t understand the projection calculations. Two in five say the information presented is too hypothetical, while 17% say the projections do not capture all of their retirement savings. A chart presenting this data can be seen here.

“Many consumers do not have a good idea what their current monthly income or expenses are. A prior SRI survey found that nearly a quarter felt they needed help with basic budgeting skills,” notes Salka. “This, coupled with unknowns like inflation and taxes, can make any retirement projections seem abstract.”

The survey results also show that just half of U.S. workers have seen a monthly retirement income projection. Women and workers with annual incomes under $75,000 were less likely to have seen an estimate of their monthly income in retirement than men or workers making $75,000 or more. Workers contributing to a defined contribution plan are nearly twice as likely as those who are not contributing to have seen a retirement income projection (67% vs. 35%).

The federal government is aware of the heightened interest in lifetime and/or retirement income projections. In fact, the Department of Labor is currently evaluating comments it has received about including such projections in participant statements. In September, Assistant Secretary of Labor Phyllis Borzi noted that there was widespread agreement among commenters that these projections are a good way of educating participants (see “Income Projections Showing Participants a Better Way”).

The survey queried 2,024 people across the United States during the month of October.

«

Thank you so much for your interest in our content. Please register to access this complimentary archived content. By registering, you will receive our newsletter which can be opted out of at any time.

 

Already Registered? Click here to confirm.