For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.
Money Market Funds Damaged by ‘Flawed’ SEC Amendments
According to the Investment Company Institute, the most significant changes were made without public input.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission amendments intended to address concerns about redemption costs and liquidity are “flawed” and have caused damage to prime money market funds, according to a report from the Investment Company Institute.
In July 2023, the SEC adopted rule amendments that included raising minimum liquidity requirements for money market funds, which it said would provide a more substantial liquidity buffer in the event of rapid redemptions. The move was made in response to the economic shock that resulted from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, when money market funds had significant outflows. According to the regulator, this contributed to stress on short-term funding markets, which in turn led to government intervention to improve liquidity.
According to the report, the SEC’s amendments have led to “significant consolidation and reduced competition” of the prime institutional segment of the money market fund industry. While strengthening the resiliency of the funds was a “worthy objective,” the ICI report stated that the inclusion of mandatory liquidity fees on prime institutional funds was the “most consequential change” and that it was made without public input. The rule requires institutional prime and institutional tax-exempt money market funds to impose a liquidity fee when they have net redemptions of at least 5% of net assets.
“MMF sponsors, service providers, and investors were not provided a meaningful opportunity to
comment on critical elements of the rule amendments that were ultimately adopted,” the ICI report stated. “The full impact of the SEC’s MMF reforms may not yet have been realized, as a prime institutional MMF could find itself in a situation where it is forced to institute a mandatory liquidity fee.”
According to the SEC, in addition to providing a “more substantial liquidity buffer” in the case of rapid redemptions, the changes also eliminate provisions that allow a money market fund to suspend redemptions temporarily. This is intended to help reduce the risk of a run on money market funds during times of market stress.
The ICI’s report cited comments made at the time by SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce, who dissented from the majority and voted against the amendments. Pierce said the changes imply that the regulator believes its judgment “is superior to that of money market funds, their sponsors, their boards, and their shareholders.” She added that there is no way of knowing if the benefits provided by the new rules outweigh their benefits.
“Now that the final implementation deadline has passed, we can begin assessing whether the SEC’s MMF reforms worked as the previous SEC leadership said they would,” the ICI report stated. “The bottom line is that many of the concerns with the 2023 reforms have come to fruition, leaving the MMF market facing greater uncertainty.”
You Might Also Like:

SEC Fines 12 Firms $63M for Failing to Maintain Proper Electronic Records

“Shadow SEC” Group Aims to Shape Discussions on Federal Securities Laws
