Millionaires Question Adviser Performance

During the financial crisis, millionaires did not express satisfaction with their advisers’ performance, but independent advisers fared better, a SpectremGroup study found.

U.S. households worth $1 million or more saw their assets decrease by 30%, according to the study. Overall, adviser satisfaction levels have dropped from 60% in the spring to 40% at the end of 2008.

While directly blaming the government and Wall Street for what happened to their assets, millionaires also show signs of questioning their advisers’ performance, said Catherine McBreen, managing director of SpectremGroup, in an interview with PLANADVISER.com. “You would think that in a tumultuous time that you would be turning to an adviser,” but that’s not the reality, she said. Although millionaires understand that it wasn’t their advisers fault they lost the money, they don’t think the adviser necessarily helped them lose less than they could have, she explained.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Less than half (36%) of millionaires indicated their adviser performed well during the crisis and only 14% said they will increase their use of financial advisers in the future, according to the study. In fact, 12% are considering getting rid of their adviser altogether, but most are waiting for the economy to stabilize, and then planning to sit back and reflect on what value the adviser added, McBreed said.

Independent advisers overall had more satisfied clients, with 56% of investors with an independent adviser saying their adviser performed well during the crisis, compared with 40% of investors using full-service brokers, according to study data.

In addition to the overall anger people felt about losing money, another surprising result of the study is the number of affluent Boomers planning to delay retirement, McBreed said. Baby Boomers show panic because of the crisis, with 45% of those five to 10 years out from retirement planning to push back their retirement date. Furthermore, more than half of Boomers plan to move investments to cash, according to the study.

The study said investors will look toward advisers and providers with more scrutiny in the future. McBreen said investors will begin to compare how advisers perform to other advisers.

So Now What?

McBreen pointed to a couple things advisers can keep in mind in order to retain business in the future. Many investors surveyed felt that what advisers offered was something the investor could find on his own through the Internet or television. “They feel like their adviser needs to come to them more proactively,” she said. Now is the time to show clients the value of a face-to-face relationship.

The study said that moving toward a fee-based compensation system might also build more trust with clients. “Don’t let them feel that you are churning their account or just moving assets around to gather fees,’ the study said.

McBreen also mentioned “plain old-fashioned customer service.” As previous Spectrem research has found (see “Call of Duty: Returning Client Calls Most Important Loyalty Sign), the value of returning client phone calls is essential. Clients generally expect a response in two to three hours, not two to three days, McBreen said. She noted a startling statistic from the study: “Almost a third of these people had not been contacted by their adviser during this crisis…Why would you stay around?’

The study, “Attitudes of Affluent Investors on Surviving the Economic Crisis,” is based on the online polling in November of 750 households, as well as focus groups.


 

 

More information is available at www.spectrem.com.

More Workers Rolling over Retirement Savings at Job Change

More workers are rolling over retirement assets when they change jobs than in past years, according to a study by the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI).

According to a press release, the study, “Lump Sum Distributions at Job Change,” found the percentage of those rolling over their most recent lump sum distribution to another tax-qualified retirement plan increased to 44.3% through 2006, compared with 19.3% of those who received their most recent distribution through 1993.

The percentage of lump sum recipients whose most recent distribution went entirely for consumption was 9.2% for distributions received through 2006, compared with 22.7% for those who received distributions through 1993.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

However, the study also found that about 60% of those who took a lump sum distribution did not roll all of it into tax-qualified savings. While some of the assets were spent purely on consumption, some also was used for home purchases, starting a business, or paying down debt, the press release said. Individuals up to age 65 and those with higher balances were more likely to roll over their assets.

Other study findings included:

  • Through April 2006, about 16.2 million working-age Americans reported ever having received a lump sum distribution from a retirement plan when changing jobs. The average amount of these distributions was $32,219 (in 2006 dollars) and the median amount was $10,000.
  • Just over 21% of the distributions were less than $2,500. Just over 16% were $50,000 or more. The rest of the distributions (about 63%) were between $2,500 and $50,000.

The study can be found in the January EBRI Notes at www.ebri.org.

 

«