Mercer Report Highlights the “Annuity Dilemma”

Many employees are hesitant to purchase an annuity, despite their desire for retirement income; however, some of these fears may be well-founded, Mercer says.  

Given the choice between a lump sum distribution and receiving monthly payments for life, most retirees would still opt for a lump sum, according to a recent Mercer report, “Retirement, Risk & Finance Perspective.” In a January 2011 survey, the Society of Actuaries found that only 20% of Americans aged 45 to 70 intend to purchase an annuity or other form of guaranteed lifetime income to protect their assets.   

The report outlines three behavioral finance attitudes that may be causing this hesitancy.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

1) Fear of leaving money on the table:

  • A premature death could result in monthly payments that, in total, are less than the account balance used to purchase the annuity.
  • A locked-in annuity payment may result in a missed opportunity if the account balance had been maintained during a period of rising markets.

2) Overlooking the risks of volatile markets:

  • Retirees are overconfident in the ability of advisers – or themselves – to manage their investments.
  • Potential outcomes may be framed in such a way as to stress the prospect of increased wealth rather than the risk of investment losses.

3) Fixation on the large account balance:

  • Monthly annuity payments may seem undervalued in comparison.
  • Account balances seem like they will always generate more retirement income.
  • Retirees hope that markets will rebound to make up past losses.

However, the report also suggests that these fears may be justifiable for some employees, because of timing issues. The question posed was whether accumulated assets can purchase an annuity that would provide adequate retirement income for the individual’s lifetime.  The age at which the individual started saving for retirement may be the deciding factor, the report notes.

The authors created a scenario for two retirees aged 65: one who started saving at age 30, and the other started saving at age 35. Each employee contributed the same percentage of pay during the savings period and received employer contributions. The analysis found that for someone who began saving for retirement at age 30, purchasing an annuity will extend their retirement income for 12 years. Conversely, for someone who didn’t start saving until age 35, purchasing an annuity can shorten the timeframe for their savings to last.

The complete report is available here.

Mutual of Omaha to Use Investment Comparison Reports

Mutual of Omaha’s Retirement Plans Division will begin using Fiduciary Investment Reporting Manager (FiRM), which generates detailed investment comparisons for retirement products.

Advisers will be able to compare a current plan’s funds performance and fees with funds offered on Mutual of Omaha’s product investment platform. FiRM, a third-party application from the Center for Fiduciary Management, includes in its report details for the plan sponsor about how the adviser performed necessary due diligence to provide customized investment solutions. It will also help evaluate whether the plan sponsor is selecting a competitive product with well-performing, low-cost funds.  

“At no additional cost, retirement plan advisers affiliated with Mutual of Omaha will have access to FiRM’s comprehensive investment analysis that provides helpful details around the total cost and performance of a product’s investment lineup,” said Chuck Lombardo, president and CEO of Retirement Marketing Solutions, Inc. (RMS), a Mutual of Omaha subsidiary. “This provides credibility and value to the adviser and also relieves the adviser from the expense of purchasing comprehensive market analysis tools or manually generating reports and researching investment performance.”  

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Mutual of Omaha said advisers can demonstrate a commitment to fair and competitive fees by using FiRM to outline the fee structure and how the fees compare with peers. The reports generated will also provide advisers with fund profiles, set benchmarks for funds, translate fund fees into dollar amounts to see bottom line costs, and offer analysis of plan investment choices.

«