Maximum Benefit and Contribution Limits Table 2025

Maximum Benefit/Contribution Limits for 2020 through 2025, with a downloadable PDF of limits from 2015 to 2025.

Maximum Benefit/Contribution Limits for 2020-2025

As Published by the Internal Revenue Service.
PDF of Maximum Benefit/Contribution Limits for 2015-2025 available here.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Click category to jump to definition.

202520242023202220212020
Elective Deferrals (401k & 403b plans) $23,500$23,000$22,500$20,500$19,500$19,500
Annual Benefit Limit $280,000$275,000$265,000$245,000$230,000$230,000
Annual Contribution Limit $70,000$69,000$66,000$61,000$58,000$57,000
Annual Compensation Limit $350,000$345,000$330,000$305,000$290,000$285,000
457(b) Deferral Limit $23,500$23,000$22,500$20,500$19,500$19,500
Highly Compensated Threshold $160,000$155,000$150,000$135,000$130,000$130,000
SIMPLE Contribution Limit $16,500$16,000$15,500$14,000$13,500$13,500
SEP Coverage Limit $750$750$750$650$600$600
SEP Compensation Limit $350,000$345,000$330,000$305,000$290,000$285,000
Income Subject to Social Security $176,100 $168,600 $160,200 $147,000 $142,800 $137,700
Top-Heavy Plan Key Employee Comp $230,000 $220,000 $215,000 $200,000 $185,000 $185,000
Catch-Up Contributions

$7,500

$7,500

$7,500

$6,500

$6,500

$6,500

Age 60-63 Catch-Up Contributions $11,250
SIMPLE Catch-Up Contributions $3,500 $3,500 $3,500 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000
Age 60-63 SIMPLE Catch-Up Contributions $5,250
Pension-Linked Emergency Savings Accounts $2,500

The Elective Deferral Limit is the maximum contribution that can be made on a pre-tax basis to a 401(k) or 403(b) plan (Internal Revenue Code section 402(g)(1)). Some still refer to this as the $7,000 limit (its original setting in 1987).

The Annual Benefit Limit is the maximum annual benefit that can be paid to a participant (IRC section 415). The limit applied is actually the lessor of the dollar limit above or 100% of the participant’s average compensation (generally the high three consecutive years of service). The participant compensation level is also subjected to the Annual Compensation Limit noted below.

The Annual Contribution Limit is the maximum annual contribution amount that can be made to a participant’s account (IRC section 415). This limit is actually expressed as the lessor of the dollar limit or 100% of the participant’s compensation, applied to the combination of employee contributions, employer contributions and forfeitures allocated to a participant’s account.

In calculating contribution allocations, a plan cannot consider any employee compensation in excess of the Annual Compensation Limit (401(a)(17)). This limit is also imposed in determining the Annual Benefit Limit (above). In calculating certain nondiscrimination tests (such as the Actual Deferral Percentage), all participant compensation is limited to this amount, for purposes of the calculation.

The 457 Deferral Limit is a similar restriction, applied to certain government plans (457 plans).

The Highly Compensated Threshold (section 414(q)(1)(B)) is the minimum compensation level established to determine highly compensated employees for purposes of nondiscrimination testing.

The SIMPLE Contribution Limit is the maximum annual contribution that can be made to a SIMPLE (Savings Incentive Match Plan for Employees) plan. SIMPLE plans are simplified retirement plans for small businesses that allow employees to make elective contributions, while requiring employers to make matching or nonelective contributions.

SEP Coverage Limit is the minimum earnings level for a self-employed individual to qualify for coverage by a Simplified Employee Pension plan (a special individual retirement account to which the employer makes direct tax-deductible contributions.

The SEP Compensation Limit is applied in determining the maximum contributions made to the plan.

EGTRRA also added the Top-heavy plan key employee compensation limit.

Catch up Contributions, SIMPLE “Catch up” deferral: Under the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Act of 2001 (EGTRRA), certain individuals aged 50 or over can now make so-called ‘catch up’ contributions, in addition to the above limits.

Retirement Benefits Valued by More Workers Than Last Year

EBRI found that more employees value retirement savings’ role in their financial security.

The 2024 Workplace Wellness Survey from the Employee Benefit Research Institute revealed that a greater percentage of employees than last year value strong retirement plans offered by their workplaces.

When workers were asked to check multiple options that contribute most to their financial security, 62% noted retirement plans, up from 56% in 2023. That boost in focus on retirement plans appeared in other areas of the survey as well.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Retirement savings plans were matched by health insurance, with 62% who reported that it contributed a lot to their sense of financial security, up slightly from 59% last year. The third most valued benefit was paid time off or leave, at 58% of respondents, the same as in 2023.

Health Insurance, Retirement Plans Influence Job Retention

When it comes to job retention, health insurance continues to play a crucial role for workers, with 72% of employees reporting it as the most important benefit in deciding whether to stay at their current job or seek new opportunities. Retirement plans ranked second (55%), followed by paid sick and vacation time, which showed significant growth in importance at 47%, up from 32% in 2022.

This increased demand for health-related and retirement benefits was matched by a wide availability of these perks: 83% of workers report being offered health insurance by their employer, and 79% have access to a retirement savings plan. Employee participation in these benefits has also grown; retirement plan enrollment rose to 85% from 79% last year, with health and dental insurance following closely behind.

Concerns About Benefit Cuts and Financial Security

Despite the broad availability of benefits, workers remain concerned about their future financial security. Survey results found 33% reported being very concerned about the future, and 36% were somewhat concerned that employers may reduce or eliminate retirement benefits. Among respondents, 32% reported that their employer has already implemented budget cuts in the past year, adding to the uncertainty about the future of workplace financial support.

Many respondents cited retirement savings as their primary source of financial stress, with 48% of workers identifying it as their greatest financial challenge. Although fewer employees now rely solely on their retirement plans as an emergency fund—50% compared with 55% last year—building a robust financial safety net remains a priority.

Courtenay Shipley, president and chief planologist of Retirement Planology Inc., which was not involved in the survey, notes that these concerns could be attributable to the volatile economic environment in mid-2024. The survey was conducted from July 22 through August 18.

“My first reaction was to determine when this survey was taken and see if outside factors could be contributing to this answer; I think yes, [they can],” Shipley says. “Consumer sentiment fell in 2024 from March to July. It turned a corner in August, and sentiment has risen since then. This survey was conducted during July amongst a number of noisy headlines.”

Shipley points to research conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic about the connection between psychological factors and information processing, financial literacy and the emotional aspects of financial well-being. She suggests that “feeling bad” about the economy could be linked to a jaded perception of employer stability and, thus, whether benefits might be cut.

“Financial advisers in the workplace continue to play a critical education role in helping employees better understand the economy,” she says. “In a world where we no longer get our news from the same few networks, I believe it’s critical to be the source that helps put the numbers in perspective for employees.”

Workers’ Preferences for Benefits Allocation

The survey also asked employees to consider how they would allocate a hypothetical $600 per month offered by their employer to be split among various benefit accounts. Most respondents indicated they would allocate the largest share of this money to a retirement savings account.

 

Mean Amount

None

$1– $99

$100– $149

$150– $199

$200– $299

$300– $600

Retirement savings account (401(k) or similar)

$226

17%

2

18

4

22

37

Emergency savings account

$175

24%

4

20

5

25

22

Health savings account

$87

44%

6

24

5

15

6

“Buy” additional paid time off

$57

60%

8

20

2

5

4

Student debt pay-down plan

$56

70%

4

12

2

6

5

Understanding employer-offered benefits remains essential. In 2024, 84% of employees said they understand their retirement benefits at least somewhat well, similar to the 85% who reported that level of understanding last year.

This year’s study surveyed a national sample of 1,005 full-time and part-time American workers aged 21 through 64, with data gathered in 20-minute online interviews conducted from July 22 through August 18. The study also included an oversample of 500 military veteran workers, with findings from this subgroup expected to be published later this year.

«