Based on data gathered from the operating results of
seventeen publicly-traded asset managers, kasina conducted an analysis
to quantify the adverse effect of a 10% market correction during the
third quarter. The results show operating margins decreasing from 31.3%
to 29.7% as a result of a 10% reversal in the Dow Jones U.S. Total Stock
Market Index.
Firms can mitigate the
impact of market gyrations by aligning product development efforts with
the needs of broker/dealers and investors who are increasingly looking
for alternative, hedge-like products that are non-correlated with
domestic equities. “Only eight alternative 40’ Act funds were created
last year. Broker/dealers are asking for these products and paying a
premium for them, but there just aren’t a lot of products out there that
truly mitigate risk,” said Steven Miyao, CEO of kasina.
In the second quarter of 2011, net margins remained
virtually unchanged at 22.2%, while operating margins increased from
30.4% to 31.3%, quarter over quarter. On the expense side of the
equation, compensation and benefits increased 1% quarter over quarter,
and firms cut their advertising and promotional budgets by 2.1% during
the same period.
Large firms with leading profitability in the second quarter
were T. Rowe Price, BlackRock, and Franklin Templeton while Calamos,
Pzena Investments, and GAMCO lead as the most profitable small firms.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
Existing Relationships Drive Choice of IRA Provider
Nearly half (48%) of retirement plan participants who rolled balances into IRAs in the past two years chose their rollover
institution based on if they already had an account there.
This makes existing relationships the number one factor
driving the choice of IRA providers, according to a study from the Spectrem Group. Other factors include offering a wide range
of investment choices (29%), excellent customer service (28%),
recommended by a financial adviser (27%), record of strong investment
performance (27%), and low fees (26%).
Adviser relationships also play a key role in IRA rollover
decisions. Depending upon their circumstances, at least 61% of
investors involved a professional adviser in the process. Among job
changers, for example, 61% used a professional adviser for rollovers.
That percentage rose to 74% for those who were retiring and 77% for
investors with large balances over $100,000.
Spectrem found that Fidelity was considered by 38% of all
individuals looking to open an IRA account. Other providers considered
by investors included Charles Schwab (25%), Vanguard (24%), ING (18%),
and American Funds and J.P. Morgan Chase (tied at 15%). The providers
that actually won the IRA accounts included Fidelity (30%), Vanguard
(11%), American Funds (9.2%), Edward Jones (7.1%), and Morgan Stanley
Smith Barney (6.6%).
One of the primary reasons these firms won the IRA
accounts is that almost 70% of investors turn to their financial adviser
for advice concerning their rollover. Not surprisingly, in many cases,
the advisory firm (i.e. Morgan Stanley, Edward Jones) offers an IRA
account solution of their own. American Funds, for example, is a popular
fund family for advisers not affiliated with a large firm. It is likely
that independent advisers assisted investors in choosing American
Funds.
Another important selection factor identified by investors
is “Low investment management fees." Sixty-nine percent of those rolling
over an IRA look for low investment management fees. “Customer service
from a person, not a VRS” is the most important selection factor for 70%
of investors. To the extent that an individual is relying upon their
adviser to choose a provider, it is not surprising that they already
feel they have a person and not a system, Spectrem said.
Income Products Attract Investors
Spectrem’s
Millionaire Corner research shows fixed-income arrangements appeal to
investors who worry they might outlive their money, or that another
economic downturn could cut into their income. At the same time,
investors seek products that are somewhat liquid, charge reasonable
fees, and keep pace with inflation.
Overall, 10% of
investors surveyed in 2011 put all or some of their 401(k) funds into
some sort of arrangement designed to pay them regular income. The most
common approach, used by 43% of survey participants, is scheduled
withdrawals from their 401(k)s. These investors will systematically
“spend down” their accounts. Another 31% say they purchased a fixed
annuity or other annuity product, and 22% say they invested their 401(k)
funds in a portfolio of fixed-income securities and plan to harvest the
interest.
Of the investors who purchased an
annuity, 45% say it was an option offered by their 401(k) plan. Another
20% of the investors say they opted for an annuity product offered by
the financial firm providing their 401(k) plan. One-third of the
investors bought the annuity from a company not connected with the plan.
The
Spectrem Group study “The IRA Rollover Market 2011,” is based on an
online survey of 940 individuals who have had the opportunity to roll
over a qualified retirement plan balance of $5,000 or more within the
past two years. The survey was conducted in July 2011.