For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.
Many Parents Put Children’s Education Ahead of Retirement Savings
Thirty-seven percent of U.S. parents say their children’s education is more important than their own retirement savings, according to a survey by HSBC Group.
Sixty percent of U.S. parents would go into debt to fund their child’s college
education, and 58% say that, while the expense
makes it more difficult to keep up with other financial commitments, it is more
important. In fact, 40% say it is more important than long-term savings and credit
card repayment (37%), as well as retirement savings (37%).
Among U.S. parents under the age of 34, 74% would consider borrowing for a
child’s education, compared with 56% of those over 35. Ninety-eight
percent of U.S. parents are considering a college education for their child.
American parents spend an average of $14,678 a year to fund a child’s education, nearly double the world average of $7,631. Although this number is seemingly high, students in the U.S. pay 37% of the college bills, one of the highest contribution rates in the world.
“The financial sacrifices that parents are
willing to make to fund their children’s education are proof of the
unquestioning support they will give to help them achieve their ambitions,”
says Charlie Nunn, HSBC Group’s global head of wealth management. “However,
parents need to make sure this financial investment is not made to the
detriment of their own future well being. By having a financial plan to meet
their family’s overall needs and reviewing it regularly, parents will be better
placed to support their children’s studies without compromising on their own
long-term financial goals.”
HSBC Group surveyed more than 6,200 parents in 15 countries.
You Might Also Like:
Increased Share of Workers Credit Employers for Efforts to Reduce Financial Stress
Capital Group Names Top Focus Areas for DC Investment Consultants
Financial Wellness Moves From “Nice to Have” to Table Stakes
« Millennial Advisers Far More Optimistic on Markets Than Their Counterparts