Majority of People Prioritize Retirement Saving Over Being Debt-Free

A Voya survey also found that 54% of employed Americans plan to work in retirement as a result of COVID-19.

More than half (55%) of working individuals say they would prefer to save enough to last through retirement rather than be free of debt, according to a Voya Financial survey.

This preference for retirement savings is even more pronounced among those working with a financial professional or owning a managed account (67%) and those participating in a retirement savings plan (65%).

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

“We’re encouraged to see this understanding of needing to take a ‘long-term view’ exists across age groups—in particular those with a longer retirement horizon,” says Charlie Nelson, chief executive officer of retirement and employee benefits for Voya Financial.

The survey also found that 54% of employed Americans are now planning to work in retirement due to COVID-19, with 40% saying they would like to work in retirement in order to build a safety net to cover unexpected costs and be better prepared for market volatility.

Fifty-nine percent of employed Baby Boomers plan to work in retirement as a result of the pandemic, and this is also true for 60% of Generation Xers and 49% of Millennials. And some may have to, if they don’t manage their debt. If they have debt, they may not be able to save as much for retirement as they’d like.

“While the majority of generations have seen challenging times and volatile markets before, the findings of our survey and our own data show an even greater opportunity for employers to help their employees address both short- and long-term needs,” Nelson says. “Employers should maintain communications around their workplace benefit offerings to ensure employees understand how the right tools and guidance can help them achieve their retirement savings and broader financial wellness goals. With open enrollment season about to begin, this is an opportune time to consider ways to ensure employees are taking advantage of all their benefit offerings.”

Shane Bartling, senior director, retirement, Willis Towers Watson, says a struggle with controlling spending is at the heart of current financial wellness efforts crowding out the ability to save for retirement. He adds that how plan sponsors present their wellness solutions and design retirement plans is significant.

Bartling suggests wellness programs should at some point shift focus away from traditional budgeting and education techniques to in-the-moment approaches that are emotionally impactful and easy to understand. For example, he says, employers could send a targeted message about tax refunds—using the money to pay off debt or establish an emergency savings fund rather than upscaling one’s lifestyle.

Brian Hamilton, vice president at Smart Dollar, previously told PLANADVISER that employer financial wellness programs should be covering the basics of what to do in an emergency and encouraging people to create an emergency savings fund.

“Coronavirus is shedding a big light on how bad it was. Americans are not prepared to handle a financial emergency—let alone a pandemic,” Hamilton said.

Nancy Hite, president and CEO of The Strategic Wealth Advisor, says she strongly believes that creating an emergency savings fund that would cover six months’ worth of spending should be people’s first priority—before saving for retirement.

Laura Varas, CEO and founder of Hearts & Wallets, agrees, saying: “Financial wellness programs need to help people holistically with all of their financial goals—not just retirement. Programs that do not just favor retirement savings but that take a more holistic approach to all of their goals will better engage participants.”

Employers Offer Broad Range of Jobs to Older Workers—But With Lower Pay

These opportunities also do not tend to offer benefits.

The Center for Retirement Research at Boston College (CRR) explored what career opportunities are available for older workers in its white paper, “What Jobs Do Employers Want Older Workers to Do?

To reach its findings, the center examined job postings at RetirementJobs.com, a national website that targets older workers, as well as a federal database of job openings.

RetirementJobs.com postings included a broad swath of occupations, most of them full time. However, the center found that the salaries for positions proactively advertised for older workers were lower than average and that only a few mentioned health or retirement benefits.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

“For these vacancies, posted salaries are lower than for vacancies not aimed at older workers,” according to the white paper.

The majority of job listings being offered to older workers fell into three categories: office jobs, health care support positions and sales jobs. Office jobs paid an average of $35,800, while health care support positions came in at $22,900 and sales positions at $52,400. Across all occupations, the average salary on RetirementJobs.com was $43,800.

“Naturally, occupations requiring more education and skills—such as management, computers, engineering, and health and legal practitioners—offer much higher salaries, over $65,000,” the center says. “However, all these categories comprise only one-quarter of the listings.”

“In sum,” the center says, “the jobs available to older workers are broadly dispersed geographically and are of generally good quality when compared with jobs aimed at the general population. This pattern is particularly true for bridge jobs that offer income but no fringe benefits. However, the jobs that employers actively try to recruit older workers to fill are of poorer quality than general jobs, in terms of both salary and benefits.”

«