LPL Settles With Ex-CEO Arnold for $12M in Stock Options
The settlement, reached a little more than two months after he was fired, was about 15% of the total he was entitled to had he been terminated ‘without cause.’
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. has settled with terminated CEO Dan Arnold for $12 million in stock options, the firm disclosed in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing on Monday.
Arnold was let go by one of the country’s largest independent broker/dealers in October for violating the firm’s “commitment to a respectful workplace” related to statements he made to employees. The filing did not disclose details of Arnold’s actions, and the company has consistently declined to comment.
The settlement amount is about 15% of the total severance benefits and equity awards Arnold would have been entitled to if he had been terminated “without cause,” according to company.
Dan Arnold
LPL had signaled a settlement might be possible shortly after the firing. Rich Steinmeier, formerly LPL’s chief growth officer, briefly served as interim CEO before the board named him to the role full time.
LPL and Arnold agreed on the terms of the settlement on Sunday, according to the filing. According to that agreement, Arnold will retain 47,994 of his non-forfeited options, which have a value of $12 million, calculated using a price per share of $327.56, the closing price of LPL’s common stock on December 6. He will forfeit his remaining 98,432 options and any severance payments he would have been entitled to under his severance plan.
The agreement also releases the company from any general claims by Arnold, and his non-competition and non-solicitation provisions will apply until September 30, 2025.
The initial charges against Arnold were brought by an outside law firm and reviewed by LPL’s board, which decided to terminate the CEO and president of about seven years.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
Many employers will be going back to the basics in 2025 when it comes to retirement plan administration and management, according to one of the largest retirement, wealth and insurance aggregators.
“Compliance and performing due diligence aren’t exciting topics, but adopting or maintaining best practices in both areas will be key to avoid litigation, regulatory action and cybercrime in 2025, helping ensure a retirement plan’s long-term future,” Hub International Ltd. wrote in its “2025 Retirement & Private Wealth Outlook.”
The focus on fiduciary diligence comes as plan sponsors are not only focused on current employees, but also managing a trend of former employees staying in a plan after they leave for another firm or retire.
Whereas in the past, an employer would seek to get participants out of a plan, advancements in plan design, digital communication with participants and cost consciousness have all driven employers’ comfort with long-term participants, says Jim O’Shaughnessy, president of retirement and private wealth at Hub.
“Things have changed so much over the last 15 years,” O’Shaughnessy says. “It’s not as much as an administrative burden as it once was [to keep people in plan].”
Having a larger plan can also result, he notes, in cost savings, particularly as collective investment trusts, which offer lower rates as plan size goes up, have become such a popular defined contribution investing vehicle. But more broadly, there is a culture of offering the benefits of a plan to participants as long as it is useful to them.
“In their hearts, most employers want to help their employees, and if their plan gives people an opportunity to get access to institutional services, versus retail price services, they seem much more open and willing—and even at times very anxious—to help them stay in that ecosystem,” O’Shaughnessy says.
Financial Wellness Programs
Keeping more participants in plans will end up driving more trends in 2025, according to O’Shaughnessy, including financial well-being programs becoming more “embedded” in retirement plans.
According to Hub, by 2026, almost half of employers will offer a financial planning program for employees, one that includes things such as housing guidance and credit improvement programs. O’Shaughnessy notes that such programs are intended to both reduce stress and anxiety for current employees and to guide those near or in retirement. While plan sponsors might not pay directly for that guidance, they want former employees to have access to low-cost options.
“It’s all interconnected in different ways,” O’Shaughnessy says. “But the overall trend is toward more personalization and more services offered. … It’s an exciting time from that perspective.”
Offering numerous services, however, comes with fiduciary and administrative risks. Which points back to the compliance focus for many plan sponsors. According to research cited by Hub from consultancy Callan in April 2024, 74% of defined contribution plans are reviewing plan fees and reviewing, updating or implementing an investment policy statement.
Making Everything ‘Better’
Another way firms are expected to try to lower risk is a strategy of offering both active and passive investment options in the plan in what is called “active/passive mirroring,” according to Hub. In this scenario, all the core asset classes in a plan are available in both active and passive versions, so plans cannot be accused of either missing out on the best-performing strategies or not offering the lowest-cost options.
O’Shaughnessy says that, in the past, advisers were more focused on shrinking the number of options in an investment menu to make them more manageable. Now, things like active/passive mirroring can be used without sacrificing simplicity.
“It’s the best of all worlds now in some ways, because you can offer the best of both active and passive while at the best price and scale,” he says.
Meanwhile, new offerings and technology are creating ways for plans to offer more personalization and access to different types of investments, depending on participant need, O’Shaughnessy says.
He points to adviser-managed accounts as an example of that potential. The evolution of that more personalized investment option to be scaled across multiple recordkeepers has made it a more attractive option, particularly when available to advisers through an advisory with the scale to staff a large investment management team.
“We very much want to utilize everything that the industry has available to create a more personalized experience: better engagement, better long-term results,” O’Shaughnessy says. “AMAs are only going to grow because of the opportunity to personalize.”