Data & Research October 15, 2013

Less Money Invites Extreme Allocating

Young workers with small balances and owners of Roth individual retirement accounts (IRAs) are likelier than other IRA owners to make “extreme” allocations to either stocks or money, a report found.
Reported by

The nonpartisan Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) in a report defined “extreme” allocations as having less than 10% or more than 90% in a particular asset category in an account.

By age, the youngest IRA owners, those below the age of 25, had the highest percentage (37.5%), with more than 90% in equities. Above age 25, the percentage of investors holding more than 90% in money/cash equivalent funds decreased. However, the percentage of IRA owners above age 25 with more than 90% invested in bonds and money combined went down as the owner’s age increased, until age 75.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

By type, Roth and traditional IRAs established by contributions were more likely to have greater than 90% invested in equities and least likely to have more than 90% invested in money/cash equivalent funds. In contrast, traditional IRAs established by rollovers, and SEP/SIMPLE IRAs were much likelier to have 10% or less invested in equities and 90% or more invested in money/cash equivalent funds

By account balance, those IRA owners with higher account balances generally were less likely to have extreme asset allocations. For example, while 37% of those with account balances of $10,000 to $24,999 had 90% or more of their assets invested in equities, only about one in 10 of those with account balances of $250,000 or more had such a high allocation to equities.

Gender showed little difference. About 29% of females and 28% of males had 90% or more of their IRA assets invested in equities. Similarly, 62% of females and about 65% of males had less than 10% invested in bonds.

The EBRI IRA Database is an ongoing project that collects data from IRA plan administrators. For 2011, it contained complete asset allocation on 18.4 million accounts with $1.388 trillion in assets.

These findings, from the October EBRI Notes, are available online, along with the latest update of the EBRI IRA Database, “IRA Asset Allocation, 2011.”

Data & Research October 15, 2013

DC Plans Have Advantages over DB Plans

A best-practice defined contribution (DC) plan can provide secure retirement income at equivalent cost to a defined benefit (DB) plan, according to a new research paper from the TIAA-CREF Institute.
Reported by

The paper, “Equivalent Costs for Equivalent Benefits: Primary DC Plans in the Public Sector,” was authored by Josh B. McGee, vice president of Public Accountability for the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, and Paul J. Yakoboski, senior economist with the TIAA-CREF Institute.

“The sweeping generalization that DB plan designs provide benefits at lower cost to public employers than could a DC structure is simply incorrect,” said the authors. “Features producing the purported DB cost advantage—such as annuitized benefit payments and low fee, professional asset management—can easily be incorporated into the DC model, and in fact, are inherent to the best practice, risk-managed DC design.” They said that many DC plans already exhibit these features, such as 401(a) and 403(b) plans sponsored by public and private colleges and universities.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

According to McGee and Yakoboski, best-practice DC plans are a viable, sustainable option for providing retirement security to workers. They concluded that assertions a DB-type structure is more cost efficient, as compared with DC ones, are based upon “dubious comparisons with the typical private sector 401(k) model and assumptions that place a heavy thumb on the scale in favor of DB plans.”

McGee and Yakoboski found that, in fact, DB plans do not possess a structural advantage over DC plans. “Providing adequate, secure income throughout retirement is the overriding objective of any retirement plan, regardless of the plan design. Risk-managed DC plans accomplish this aim by incorporating longevity risk pooling through in-plan annuities, automatic diversified asset allocation solutions in a limited menu of professionally managed, low-fee investment options, and objective advice for plan participants. Best-practice DC plans are a viable, sustainable option for providing retirement security to workers.”

More information on this research paper can be found here.

«