Is A Big Shift to Managed Accounts Likely?

One retirement planning industry executive feels TDFs have done a lot for a lot of people, “but it’s time to go from a good idea to a great idea.”

It was only about a decade ago that Stadion Money Management, which bills itself as a defensively oriented money manager committed to using exchange traded funds (ETFs), first started to offer a target-date fund (TDF) series to institutional clients, says Tim McCabe, senior vice president and national retirement sales director.

“And full disclosure, we are still committed to our TDF product lines and the opportunities that will continue on that side of the business, but we are very excited to announce a new push into managed accounts,” McCabe tells PLANADVISER. “TDFs have been a great first step for everyone, getting people into the ballpark post-[Pension Protection Act] on where they should be with asset allocation, but we can do better.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

McCabe says for Stadion, doing better in the qualified default investment alternative (QDIA) slot means leveraging new technologies to bring to market an affordable new managed account service that delivers greater customization than a TDF, “and for about the same price.” According to McCabe, a new Stadion offering called “Storyline” brings just such capabilities to defined contribution (DC) plan participants.

From the participant service perspective, the Storyline product seems to be in line with other managed account services already available in the market, but McCabe is particularly enthusiastic about the pricing and the general opportunity surrounding managed accounts. He says managed accounts are likely to become more and more viable as a QDIA opportunity for smaller and smaller plans, especially with rapid technology innovation sweeping into the financial services space.

“What we’ve done with Storyline is that everyone is going to get the chance to write their own story,” he explains. “It’s the next chapter for how money will be managed. It will mean more customization than a TDF, which only looks at plan populations. It means more personalization and better outcomes.”

NEXT: Addressing leakage and other issues 

McCabe feels managed accounts are poised for strong growth in all segments of the retirement planning market because “simply basing someone’s investment allocation on age is not good enough, especially when the technology capabilities are coming into place to do so much more than that.”

He observes “most of the people who own TDFs also own something else, so right off the bat you’re missing the proper asset allocation and throwing off the risk and return budgets.” Over time, as participants gain other assets/liabilities outside the 401(k) account balance—as many do—McCabe says the drift in a person’s true risk-return profile versus what the TDF is delivering can be substantial.

“With a product like Storyline, we can use the data we have on a participant to refine the risk tolerance beyond what is possible with a proprietary or even a customized TDF,” McCabe explains. “The technology is finally coming into place where we can efficiently deliver this kind of service much further down market. As you know, we are not a provider focused on mega plans. We are very much targeting small plans with this service.”

McCabe says plan sponsors will be able to get access to the managed accounts for a fee of around 45 to 55 basis points per year, which he says is in line or better than many TDF suites.

“We will continue to refine the product and our service, but for right now the most important thing is getting people into the most tailored glide path we can that includes all this outside information,” McCabe concludes. “The other big component is gamification. We have designed the system so participants can go in and play around with the savings variables and envision what a more successful plan would look like. That’s the first step for a lot of people.”

Investor Interest in Robo-Advisers Soars

Millennials are early adopters, but Gen X is nudging its way into the action.

Nearly one-third (30%) of affluent Americans already use some type of automated investment advice service—also known as a robo-adviser—to manage a portion of their assets, according to the 2015 Investor Brandscape report from Cogent Reports, the syndicated research division of Market Strategies International. Another 22% are thinking about placing money with a robo-adviser in the near future. However, despite increasing comfort with using these products, investors seem uncertain about where to turn for a solution.

Among those expressing interest, only half (51%) can name a would-be provider, leaving the other half (49%), about 10% of all affluent Americans, open to learning about automated investment advice solutions from well-known players and upstarts alike.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Cogent Reports found that 17% of investors are using robo-adviser services from an established provider—such as Fidelity, Vanguard and Charles Schwab—while 10% are using one of nearly two dozen emerging providers, and an additional 7% are unable to name their provider.

The research reveals that three-quarters (76%) of robo-adviser users have less than $500,000 in total investable assets; however, money invested with a robo-adviser typically represents a majority of users’ assets—60% on average. While Millennials (26%) and Gen Xers (31%) make up the majority of current robo-adviser users, four in 10 users are either First Wave (18%) or Second Wave (19%) Baby Boomers.

At this point, saying that robo-advisers have gained traction in the marketplace would be a dramatic understatement, especially when it comes to younger investors, says Linda York, vice president at Market Strategies.

NEXT: Taking a wait-and-see attitude is so last year. 

“With adoption anticipated to increase rapidly, industry leaders are scrambling to figure out how to get into the game,” York says. “Since sitting on the sidelines is not an option, many companies are considering whether to build it or buy it.”

According to Cogent Reports, the vast majority of near-term adoption of robo-advisers will come not from Millennials, but Gen Xers, the oldest of whom turn 50 this year. Not only is this the generation most interested in robo-advisers, it is also the group most likely to name an emerging provider for consideration.

Two factors separate those investors likely to embrace robo-advisers from those who will not, York says. First, a much higher level of concern about the ability to save for and adequately fund retirement, and second, a strong desire for enhanced investment performance. “These priorities coupled with a notably higher risk-profile suggest that many pre-retirees see automated investment service solutions as a good way of getting to their retirement goals,” York says. "Needless to say, this could have huge implications for the IRA rollover marketplace as well as threaten the dominance of traditional target-date funds inside of DC plans.”

The 10 providers Generation X investors are likely to consider are:

  1. Fidelity Investments
  2. Vanguard
  3. Charles Schwab
  4. Motley Fool Wealth Management
  5. Betterment
  6. Wealthfront
  7. AssetBuilder
  8. Hedgeable
  9. Personal Capital
  10. FutureAdvisor

Cogent Reports interviewed 3,889 affluent investors who were recruited from the Research Now, SSI and Usamp online panels. Respondents were required to have at least $100,000 in investable assets (excluding real estate).

More information about the Investor Brandscape Report is on Cogent’s website.

«