How to Run an HSA Exempt from ERISA

One common mistake plan sponsors make is representing the HSA as part of their employee welfare benefit plan.

While few employers that offer health savings accounts (HSAs) become overly involved in running them and thereby subject the accounts to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), there are Department of Labor (DOL) guidelines that advisers should be aware of when working with plan sponsor clients on HSAs to avoid this foible, says Steven Mindy, an attorney in Alston & Bird’s compensation, benefits and ERISA practice in Washington, D.C.

Namely, DOL issued a Field Assistance Bulletin in 2004 addressing HSAs and ERISA and then followed up with further guidance in 2006, Mindy says. The DOL said employers can either follow the safe harbor practices for group insurance plans to avoid subjecting their HSAs to ERISA or follow six guidelines, he says.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

The first is that participation in the HSA must be voluntary. Second, the employer cannot restrict their employees from moving funds in the HSAs the employer sponsors to another HSA. Third, the employer cannot influence or make investment decisions for their participants holding HSAs. Fourth, the employer cannot limit the employees from using the funds in their HSAs beyond what is permitted in the tax code; for example, the employer cannot tell their employees that they can only use their HSA funds for medical reasons, as HSA investors can use them for other purposes subject to penalties and taxes.

Fifth, and this is the most common mistake employers make, Mindy says, the employer cannot represent the HSA as part of their employee welfare benefit plan. Finally, the employer cannot receive any payment or compensation in connection with the HSAs.

Should the HSA become subject to ERISA, the employer would have to maintain a plan document and summary plan description and file a Form 5500 with the DOL annually, Mindy says. The more challenging component would be that the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPPA) and the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) would apply to the HSAs, Mindy says. “That would be challenging because HSAs are individual accounts, and only the account holder knows their medical information,” he says.

Another area that employers should be aware of when offering an HSA that could potentially encroach into ERISA territory is if a participant is using their HSA as a savings account since it allows for pre-tax contributions, tax-free interest and the tax-free use of the money for medical purposes, Mindy says. Should an employer recommend an HSA over a 401(k) due to the tax-free use of the money, as opposed to the taxes paid on 401(k) plan withdrawals, that would be considered an investment recommendation.

However, for the most part, Mindy says, “it is very rare that an employer will run afoul of these rules, thanks to the advice from their advisers and service providers.”

Phased Retirement Can Preserve Boomers’ Knowledge: GAO

Today, however, only 15% of workers between the ages of 61 to 66 are semi-retired.

In a report to the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) recommends that employers adopt phased retirement programs, so that they won’t negatively affect the knowledge and experience of Baby Boomers. However, only 15% of workers between the ages of 61 and 66 are semi-retired, according to the GAO.

The GAO also reviewed a 2016 Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) survey, that found only 5% of its membership base offered a formal phased retirement program. However, 11% offered an informal phased retirement program. Among large employers, those with 2,500 to 9,999 workers, 16% offered a formal phased retirement program.

“Nine of 16 experts GAO interviewed explained that industries with skilled workers or labor shortages are motivated to offer phased retirement because their workers are hard to replace,” GAO says. Consulting, education, government, utilities and high-tech are among the industries most likely to offer phased retirement, according to the GAO. “While not all researchers agree, it has been suggested by some that as the population ages and the number of Baby Boomers leaving the labor force increases, there could be a loss of economic productivity. The availability of phased retirement, by extending the labor force participation, has the potential to provide options that would be beneficial both to the older workers and the overall economy.”

Reasons why employers do not offer phased retirement programs include the belief that older workers are less productive and have more expensive health care costs, according to the GAO. Other employers are concerned about regulatory complexities involving federal tax and age discrimination laws.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Among those that do offer phased retirement said they did so to enable knowledge transfer and to manage their workforce more capably.

«