HBS says the new location will be staffed by a team of
executives, led by Peter Margiotta in the role of vice president, client relationship
development. The new office is tasked with deepening client services and access
to senior executives for the New York City area.
Peter Margiotta has more than 25 years of experience in the
retirement benefit planning industry, HBS notes, specializing in retirement
plans for health care and not-for-profit organizations. Before HBS, he held
positions including national sales director at Great-West, where he was
responsible for the marketing of products and overseeing the transition and
integration of new clients. He began his career with Mutual of New
York/Diversified Investment Advisors.
HBS is headquartered near Albany, with offices in Cranford,
New Jersey, Rochester, Tonawanda, and now Melville, New York.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
In a conversation with PLANADVISER, Lisa Weil of ProcessUnity shares insights gained from experience launching earlier digital tools for qualified retirement plan sponsors.
Today Lisa Weil is vice president of industry solutions for
ProcessUnity, a firm introducing cloud-based practice management support
services in the qualified retirement plan space. Her experience includes 12 years at Fidelity, where she held product leadership roles spanning the institutional
and retail markets—along with early career work as a software developer.
One can imagine why that background would be helpful in the retirement
plan services market today. She likens Fidelity “to a big software company, as
well as a financial services company.” From that perspective, the jump to financial services from earlier work in technology did not disappoint, Weil says, given the company’s interest in solutions development and integration.
She can’t speak for the firm’s current operations, she says,
“but I got to participate in a lot of really interesting development work
there, and I wound up spending a significant amount of time in the retirement
and 401(k) parts of the business. I was working in these roles when the Internet
was first being introduced to plan sponsors as a way to really communicate and
manage their employee benefits.”
Weil eventually took on leadership of the firm’s defined
contribution (DC) and (DB) product lines.
“At that time, even though we were performing well in the market,
we still felt as though the services we were delivering to clients were very reactive to what plan sponsors said they wanted or needed,” Weil
remembers. “Over time, we started to feel the need to reverse that—to have a
strong view on what the best way is to service a loan or deliver enrollment
information. What would be the best way to package all the different tools and portals
that plan sponsors use to promote retirement readiness? We needed to answer
these questions.”
It’s still a conversation that is playing out today, she
adds. Firms across the retirement services spectrum are stepping back and
reassessing their approach to technology. As Weil puts it, “firms are learning to take
a step back and stop adding ad hoc technology features and functions. The next step
is to take a really hard look at service delivery and ask how we can use
our technology strengths to improve retirement plans.”
Practically, Weil says, this means firms have to “come up
with specific points of view around the best ways to deliver all the various
services they are delivering.” A big part of this will be defining what outcomes are important and what the best technology pathways to reaching those outcomes might be.
“It’s not going to really promote positive
retirement outcomes if service providers are not being efficient or highly
responsive and transparent in their work with clients,” she notes.
Plugging for her current firm, Weil says this type of efficiency
and transparency is basically what ProcessUnity strives to deliver as a
third-party service provider. “We help firms catalog and organize all of their
services and client relationships, with a major goal being to provide all
client-facing representatives and associates with a consistent point of view
and set of capabilities to sell.”
Perhaps even more important, Weil says her firm can help
providers organize their staff in the most reasonable and efficient way to
serve the book of business. She believes this vertically integrated approach can
bring substantial efficiencies to large and small firms alike. Benefits include
cutting down on unnecessary duplication of effort and getting the right staff
to focus on the right work at the right time. These sound like straightforward concepts, Weil says, but they're not always easy to accomplish in a large financial services firm with a substantial book of assets under management. Different offices can adopt slightly different practices, she says, and over time service delivery can get exceptionally complicated.
Weil suggests the cloud will have an increasingly important
role to play for retirement plan service providers, but the financial industry’s
characteristic conservativism and massive scale make rapid change challenging.
“There is still an ongoing evolution in how the big firms
are sequencing and sourcing the work they’re doing—and how comfortable they are
putting certain things out in the cloud versus using more traditional styles of
technology infrastructure,” she continues. “I’m still surprised how many big
providers haven’t even fully embraced the first generation of cloud-based platforms,
whether that’s Salesforce or a similar product, that really just involves
getting a unified client information system in place that can be accessed
remotely.”
One major benefit of using this type of service, Weil says, is the availability of prepared reports and documents for use by producing reps and advisers, as well as client service staffers.
With current events in mind, Weil feels the industry “is at an
interesting inflection point where we are seeing a real change in what this
business is all about—it’s reflected in the much talked about regulatory
initiatives. There is a real focus on outcomes, and I think this can only means
technology will have an increasingly important role.”
“I talk to a lot of folks who are unsure about where a lot
of the current rulemaking is going to go,” she concludes (see “SEC
Signals Intent for Uniform Advice Standards”). “Firms have for years been
slowing down their decisionmaking as a result of the nearly constant regulatory
changes. My hope is that we will see these efforts concluded so that firms can
feel more confident moving forward and making real changes.”