Jason Jeskey is a former practicing ERISA attorney, who joined 401(k) Advisors in 2011 as a senior plan consultant and ERISA specialist. Bill Chetney, GRP’s CEO, says Jeskey will be GRP’s general and ERISA counsel. Kyle Posvistak, an investment adviser representative, joined 401(k) Advisors in 2007 to assist the RFP/benchmarking team, conducting DC searches from $1 million to $900 million in plan assets. Austin Gwilliam is a bilingual senior plan consultant who joined 401(k) Advisors in 2005. Posvistak and Gwilliam will be part of the team in the GRP home office. “I am excited to have them on the team,” Chetney says.
GRP is a new retirement plan advisory firm and office of supervisory jurisdiction (OSJ) being built out of LPL’s acquisition of broker/dealer Financial Telesis (FTi) (see “LPL and Financial Telesis Create New RIA Firm“). GRP will team with LPL’s Hybrid RIA platform. Financial Telesis’s founder and CEO, Jim Williams, is president of GRP. Although the firm has launched, the official transfer date of the Financial Telesis advisers is August 14, and all the advisers’ securities licenses will be at LPL, with the RIA at GRP.
Chetney says of the need to form GRP within LPL, all advisers are licensed with LPL but are required to have an office of supervisory jurisdiction (OSJ) at the broker/dealer (B/D). GRP is going to be the only “retirement-centric OSJ,” Chetney says, which he says is the last piece of the puzzle for LPL to fully specialize in retirement plans and “be dominant in this space.”
According to Chetney, part of the reason he was able to recruit the three men from 401k Advisors was because of the level of investment LPL is making in worksite education for participants. GRP is able to leverage the tools of LPL (because all the advisers have their securities licenses at LPL), making the OSJ more attractive for the retirement-focused advisers, who will not only be able to serve their plan sponsor clients but make a difference in the retirement success of plan participants.
Chetney hopes that GRP, and its leadership, will also be attractive to many of the “artists formerly known as NRP,” advisers he is now hoping will join GRP for their OSJ, many of whom are under home office jurisdiction now.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
In the defined contribution (DC) market, sales and
value-added programs are more closely linked than in any other segment of asset
management. But there is little research or documentation that really
scrutinizes these programs or identifies industry best practices.
“Changing the DC Advisor Value-Add Game: Maximizing Your
Investment in DC Advisor Value-Added Programs,” an upcoming survey report by Chatham
Partners, takes a deep dive into these tools and programs, the firms that offer
them, and what users think of their quality and usefulness.
“We wanted to put together something unique around the issue
of value-add,” says Bruce Harrington, a broker/dealer practitioner and a
co-author of the report. Value-added programs have accrued a lot of resources,
he tells PLANADVISER, and people spend a lot of attention on them.
Compiling input from hundreds of financial advisers, as well as retirement
heads at broker/dealers and industry executives at DCIO and recordkeeping
firms, the research gives a really interesting perspective, he says. Harrington
describes himself as more of an industry person, which he says made the
collaboration interesting. (Joshua Dietch, managing director of Chatham
Partners, brought his research background to the project.)
Chatham wanted to create a metric that boils everything down
to a number to produce an index, Dietch says: “We thought, ‘What are the
things that you [the provider] would view as the desired outcomes of offering
the value-added program?’”
Level of satisfaction in five areas of tools and
programs—practice management, sales and lead generation, plan sponsor engagement,
plan participant engagement and intellectual capital or thought leadership—were
ranked for one part of the score.
Value-added tools and programs need to create awareness as
well as differentiation for a provider, and these two areas are also scored. Adviser
willingness to reward a provider with additional business as a result of
superior value-added tools and programs was also scored, as well as how frequently a
provider is cited as offering the best value-added programs.
The index includes a net promoter score, which represents
the client’s likelihood of recommending the recordkeeper or DCIO firm they
named as providing the overall best value-added tools and programs.
Surveying the
Programs
Once these metrics were developed, the survey was simple. Dietch said it had just three
basic questions for each category: Do these programs help win business for our
firm? Do they differentiate us? Do they lead to more incremental sales? “We
asked these questions of all the advisers about their preferred provider,
investment firm or a recordkeeper,” Dietch says. Last, they asked about the
frequency of mentions for a firm. “Frequency is indicative of popularity but
also of quality,” he says. “It means preferred providers who are doing
something right.”
Value-add programs vary, and one size does not fit all, the
report found. Often the appeal speaks to an adviser, channel or target market
segment. True specialist DC advisers are the likeliest to value and use
intellectual capital pieces, and wirehouse advisers are more apt to use
practice management tools.
“People often take issue with thought leadership,”
Dietch says. “It’s just another way to ‘kill a forest’ using up all that paper for printing research. But at the end of
the day, the most voracious consumers of thought leadership are the advisers who
earn the bulk of their income from retirement plans,” he says. “They’re always
looking for ideas that either benefit their practice or benefit their clients,
and they can take that intellectual capital and make it their own.”
Another key takeaway is that value-added programs open doors or
break ties. “It’s helpful to know who the adviser’s clients are as well,”
Dietch says, “and what issues are really important to them. If I am an
adviser and I’m selling to small-business people, I might not walk in the door
talking about my sophisticated investment selection process.”
Data in the report shows somewhat low marks for programs and
tools that specialize in sales and lead generation (4.61 and 3.66 out of a
possible 7). Nearly half of advisers surveyed (47%) strongly agreed that value-added
programs in sales resulted in provider recommendations, and just 14% strongly
agreed that value-added programs in lead generation resulted in provider
recommendations.
Target Audience
Awareness, differentiation and driving sales are the three
key points, Dietch says, but the conception versus the execution of the
programs seems to have a bit of a gap. “In some ways, you have to really think
about who you offer to, what you offer them, and how you deliver.”
When value-added programs are developed, Dietch notes, perhaps
some disconnect is inevitable. “Internally, you have marketing, products, sales—all
these constituencies,” he says. “Externally, there is the adviser, the
broker/dealer and advisory firms. What kind of synthesis of insight are you
doing to capture all those perspectives?”
Measurement is another key, Dietch says. Some firms do
not measure anything and say it’s too difficult, he says, but his firm tracks
at the team level. Many factors can be measured. “If I route advisers through our
home office we flag those advisers so we can baseline their activity and measure
output,” he says. “What level of activity comes from new content? Does certain
activity produce a spike?”
The ultimate goal of any DCIO firm and recordkeeper is attaining
the status of preferred provider, and being a DC adviser’s preferred provider
and offering top-notch value-added programs are strongly correlated, the report
found. Chatham measured the percentage of overlap when ranking the strengths of
value-added programs and in designating a provider as preferred.
Dietch says the strength of that overlap was surprising.
“It was the first time anyone has validated the thesis,” he says. “Maybe we
were just patting ourselves on the back; I don’t know,” he says. “People have
always said value-add is a means to open doors or break ties, and we wanted to
test that thesis, and largely it is true.”
However, the simple offering of a value-add may not be
enough, Harrington says. “Just because you do it, doesn’t mean you do it well,”
he points out.
“Changing the DC Advisor Value-Add Game: Maximizing Your
Investment in DC Advisor Value-Added Programs” will soon be available through Chatham Partners’ website.