Fintech Firm Relaunches With Aim to Increase Participant Use of Retirement Plans

Remotiv was designed to use a psychology-based savings mindset training approach that includes unconflicted retirement savings coaches as well as personalized messaging.

Financial Soundings, an independent, savings-focused fintech company, has announced its relaunch under the new name Remotiv, derived from Retirement Motivation Technologies.

Bobby Dughi, the firm’s chairman and CEO, says the purpose of the relaunch is to complete the rollout of Remotiv’s new technologies. President Steve Maschino says the firm has continued to develop and refine its data-driven and employee-centric Retirement Readiness (RR) platform, which is designed to increase the efficient use of employer-sponsored retirement plan benefits.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

The platform includes the following components: Lifestyle RR, the Savings Mindset Coach (SMC) app and personalized coaching for employees who need assistance saving more for retirement. The relaunch announcement says all components of Remotiv’s platform are flexible and can be customized to fit the exact needs of each plan sponsor and its employees.

Working with sport and performance psychology professionals, Remotiv was designed to use a psychology-based savings mindset training approach that includes unconflicted retirement savings coaches as well as personalized messaging in the soon-to-be-launched SMC app. Additional improvements embedded in the RR software include lifestyle enhancements to further customize the RR Score, targeted and dynamic education, retirement outcome projections, individual savings strategies, and flexible plan sponsor-directed investment strategies.

The firm says Remotiv helps large employers looking to enhance the fiduciary governance of their retirement plans by delivering a custom solution that increases employee savings while remaining disconnected from the selection of investment products, fund selection and plan design.

“Our complementary technology allows us to embed our solution while creating very little work for our employer clients, and I know that is something they appreciate about our service,” says Lee Tupper, chief technology officer (CTO) and system architect.

Tupper adds, “We continue to deliver great benefits not only to our employer clients and their workforce, but also to our recordkeeper, adviser and product provider partners.”

Strong Cybersecurity Policies Must Be a Firm Priority

From reputational damage to the downstream effect of more expensive fiduciary liability insurance, advisory firms have a lot to lose from lax cybersecurity practices.

Cybersecurity breaches are a growing concern among advisers, and, without sufficient protections, the benefits of America’s workers may be at risk. With this challenge in mind, a recent panel discussion hosted by Fi360, a Broadridge company, detailed how to prepare a plan to keep up with current and future risks.

There are two major risks advisers should keep in mind when thinking about cybersecurity, said Bonnie Treichel, Endeavor Retirement’s chief solutions officer. First is the loss of funds or participant assets, and the second is the loss of data—including personally identifiable information (PII) such as Social Security numbers, addresses and anything that should not be publicly available. Treichel said both types of breaches can cause significant damage to a firm’s clients, as well as its internal operations and credibility in the marketplace, and so an effective cybersecurity strategy must address both possibilities.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Firms face great risk once there is a breach, and Treichel explained that the downstream effects of a breach can be long-lasting. A breach is going to cause reputational harm to any firm, and there will also be operational disruption, she said. The average operational recovery time for a company is in the ballpark of three weeks. Not to mention that the recovery comes with a significant cost. There may then be an investigation, lost revenues and other spending to make participants whole again through services such as credit monitoring.

The harm that can befall a firm and its clients based on cybersecurity breaches was evident in recent regulatory actions taken by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The market regulator announced in September that it was levying a series of sanctions against eight registered advisory firms for failures in their cybersecurity policies and procedures. According to the SEC, various process and procedural failures led to pernicious “email account takeovers” exposing the personal information of thousands of customers and clients at each firm. The SEC says the eight firms, some of which operate collectively, agreed to settle the charges, together paying $750,000 to settle the matter without formally admitting fault or wrongdoing.  

As the speakers on the Broadridge webinar emphasized, there are long-term harms that come after the regulatory dust has settled. These may include increased insurance premiums and future lawsuit exposure. The severity of a breach will be based on a firm’s initial response and the cybersecurity program in place, Treichel said.

“A cybersecurity program identifies and assesses your internal and external cybersecurity risks that may threaten the confidentiality, integrity or availability of electronically stored information,” added Sarah Chase-McRorie, Matrix Financial Solutions Inc. senior legal counsel. “An effective program is going to have a well-documented information security policy, procedure guidelines and standards to protect your firm’s IT [information technology] infrastructure and data stored on the system.”

The speakers noted that the Department of Labor (DOL) recently released its own guidance on cybersecurity that has spurred more conversations on the matter.

Chase-McRorie said it is important to know what guidelines apply to each individual firm based on what type of service provider it is. When developing a framework, she recommended using the new guidance as an internal checklist and limiting the sharing of data between providers to only what is necessary.

«