Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.
Products & Services October 14, 2024
Why Falling Interest Rates May Help Stable Value’s Play
A stable value proponent explains why the ‘rate of change’ of interest rates is as important as the changes themselves for these funds only available for tax-qualified retirement plans.
Reported by Alex Ortolani
According to an annual study by MetLife, 82% of defined contribution plan sponsors offer stable value funds as a capital preservation option, and that rate has held steady since 2022.
Now, after higher interest rates helped produce a strong run by rival money market funds, stable value funds are pushing back into the conversation as the Federal Reserve embarks on a rate-cutting regime.
Plan advisers, of course, play a role in discussing the pros and cons of these fixed-income investments paired with a stable value contract, or “wrap,” from an insurance company or other financial institution. According to MetLife, 84% of plan sponsors who offer stable value funds—which are only available in tax-qualified retirement plans—say they heard about it from an adviser.
Ken Waineo
Ken Waineo, senior director of institutional products at The Standard, says a key consideration when discussing the investment option is not so much the rise and fall of interest rates, but the “rate of change” at which those adjustments occur.
“It was the fact that rates climbed so quickly is how money markets outperformed” as people were able to capture the higher returns with them, he explains. “Looking historically, though, over the past 30 years, stable value generally outperforms money market funds.”
The Standard sells of stable value funds with a guarantee from a general account group annuity contract. But studies comparing the funds do prove Waineo’s point. The key for plan advisers, Waineo says, is considering the goals of a plan sponsor looking for a capital preservation tool for participants.
“Money markets turn over pretty quickly and respond to interest rates much quicker,” he says. “But as time goes on, stable value starts to catch up.”
Waineo equates money market funds to a speedboat, providing a fast response, and stable value funds as “more of a slow tanker,” which will take time to catch up.
“The nice thing about that is that if you have a declining-rate environment, it takes longer to float down, because you have these longer maturities,” he notes.
The slower pace may then be better for retirement savers with longer time horizons. That is partly why stable value funds were a popular default option before the Pension Protection Act of 2006 eventually ushered in the age of target-date funds as the most common qualified investment default alternative.
While generally not used as a QDIA today, stable value funds can be part of a default solution through vehicles such as a managed account or customized target-date allocation. Money market funds may have the “same goal in mind for the retirement plan” as stable value, but the longer-term nature of retirement savings makes the average three-to-five-year maturity of stable value more compelling, Waineo says.
If plan advisers are recommending stable value, they should consider what the product is and the ultimate needs of the plan. Waineo notes areas to study include the underlying investments in the fund, the credit rating of the insurer backing and the fees associated with it.
“If your sole goal is liquidity, then a money market may make better sense for a client,” he says.
Waineo maintains that, no matter the final decision an adviser makes, it can be useful to be up to date on stable value.
“If advisers can really understand the offering, it can differentiate them from someone down the street,” he says.
Correction: Fixes misquote regarding the use of money market funds.
