Catching Up With PIMCO’s Personalized Target-Date Funds

The firm continues to pitch its myTDF, a personalized target-date-fund solution in market since 2023, as a way for plan advisers to bring clients a more personalized glide path.
Catching Up With PIMCO’s Personalized Target-Date Funds

Target-date funds have long been a staple of retirement planning, offering employees an age-based glide path to guide their asset allocation. However, a growing demand for personalization has led to discussion of more personalized TDFs that can cater to client needs.

PIMCO’s myTDF, launched in 2021 and offered in market in 2023, has been a prominent offering of a TDF that incorporates more participant-specific data and promises to better align investment strategies with individual goals.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

“The objective of a savings or income program, like a glide path, is to get to a certain replacement ratio,” says Rene Martel, PIMCO’s head of retirement. “We want people to be able to ultimately replace, hypothetically, say, 70% of their salary in retirement.”

He explains there are several factors that can impact the glide path, including current balance, salary, contributions, employer matches and age. Traditional TDFs typically tailor the glide path only to age. All other considerations are based on broad averages or plan-wide demographics.

Martel notes that myTDF, and similar personalized options, integrate data from recordkeepers to account for each participant’s unique financial profile, such as their contribution rate and salary history. This results in an individualized glide path for every plan member, rather than a one-size-fits-all solution.

As the retirement landscape shifts toward increased customization, personalized TDFs are seeking position among more prevalent managed accounts, either as a sole solution or a bridge to MAs. As of recent reporting by lead MA provider Edelman Financial Engines, the market for MAs in defined contribution plans is about $500 billion; other providers include a third-party offering from Morningstar Inc. and recordkeepers including Fidelity Investments and Empower.

PIMCO is also partnered with Nexus338’s iGPS, a TDF solution that includes age, salary, assets, deferral rate and match rate. Nexus338 is the 3(38) provider, PIMCO is the investment manager and iJoin is the technology provider.

Early Rollout and Adoption

The journey to create myTDF began in earnest in about 2019, Martel says, with significant progress made by mid-2022 and broader market availability by 2023. Since its launch, the product has been used by more than 300 plan sponsors. Combined, these plans manage approximately $470 million in assets.

To accommodate varying client needs, myTDF is offered in two versions. The difference between the two lies in who acts as the fiduciary under ERISA Section 3(38): the asset manager or a third party.

The product is now live on four recordkeeping platforms, with plans for further expansion. Martel acknowledged the challenges of integrating with additional platforms, noting that each connection requires time, resources and coordination with recordkeepers. However, he expects the process to accelerate as familiarity with the systems improves.

Addressing Challenges and Future Growth

While personalized TDFs represent a significant step forward, there are hurdles to overcome. Data quality is a key concern. Although factors like age, salary and contributions are readily available, other variables, such as defined benefit plan details, are harder to capture, Martel says. These nuances could further enhance the customization of glide paths but require more robust data integration.

Martel emphasizes the importance of accurate data, stating, “What we’re delivering hinges on the data being correct. As we add more factors, ensuring accuracy and consistency will be critical.”

Looking ahead, Martel expects myTDF to incorporate lifetime income solutions, such as annuities, into its offerings. This would allow participants to allocate a portion of their savings to guaranteed income products based on their personal circumstances.

Another area PIMCO hopes to explore is a dual-QDIA model, in which participants initially invest in traditional TDFs and then transition to personalized options as they near retirement. This approach could address cost concerns while maximizing the benefits of personalization when participants’ balances are larger and their circumstances more complex.

Positive Reception, But Room for Improvement

Feedback from plan advisers has been largely positive, Martel shares, particularly for plans with diverse participant demographics. He says advisers are interested in how personalized TDFs offer tailored solutions without requiring participants to actively engage with investment platforms, a common barrier to adoption.

He says advisers have also offered areas for improvement, such as implementing the dual-QDIA model to balance cost and value. Martel notes that while the focus has been on simplicity, these ideas are under consideration as the product evolves.

More on this topic:

How TDFs Are Evolving
Beyond TDFs
Nuts & Bolts: Best Practices in Target-Date-Fund Selection
Q&A: Seeking a More Perfect TDF
TDFs With Annuity Options Set to Proliferate

How TDFs Are Evolving

Personalizing glide paths by drawing on data from recordkeepers may help lead to better participant outcomes.

Target-date funds have become the go-to retirement savings vehicle for most Americans. After being named a qualified default investment alternative by the passage of the Pension Protection Act in 2006, the investment vehicles have only grown in popularity, hitting a record high of $3.47 trillion in 2023.

TDFs gained their status as the de facto investment vehicle for good reason: Their simple “set it and forget it” approach adjusts participants’ risk portfolios over time based on a targeted retirement date. But recently, they’ve been getting a makeover.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

More and more fund providers are launching personalized takes on the TDF, hoping to satisfy participants’ growing desire for products that meet their specific retirement needs.

“Personalization has become more needed in the marketplace and delivered much more efficiently given how technology has progressed over the years,” says Brett Fisher, head of investment product strategy at Principal Financial Group.

The Personalized Approach

While TDFs have been lauded for simplicity, it’s also their greatest knock: They offer people of the same age the same asset allocation without taking into account the differences in participants’ financial situations and goals.

“Two people with the same age can have very different circumstances in terms of how much they’re ready for your retirement, how much they’ve saved, how much they contribute to the plan and how long until they plan to retire,” says Rene Martel, head of retirement at PIMCO.

One solution the marketplace came up with is managed accounts, which continue to gain traction. But that solution also tends to come at a higher cost than TDFs and work best with participant engagement.

There’s a lot of “white space” for customization between the traditional TDF and a managed account, Martel says. PIMCO is trying to fill that space by offering personalization without the high costs or need for participant engagement via its personalized TDF, which uses data from recordkeepers— such as participants’ balances, contributions and employer matches—to create a glide path specific to each participant instead of one based on national averages.

“It might not get you as much customization as managed accounts because there is more information you can provide if you engage… but maybe you get 80% of the way there in terms of the benefit of personalization,” Martel says.

Evolving Personalization 

Principal has been offering TDFs since 2001. But as demands have changed, so have its offerings. Fisher says that when you think of personalization in the TDF space, you tend to think of a custom TDF for a very large plan—and while Principal does offer that, it’s also focused on giving participants their own customized glide paths.

In the first quarter of 2025, the provider will launch Principal Personalized Target Date, which will use Principal’s existing relationship with Morningstar as an advice engine provider. The advice engine will be applied to Principal’s proprietary target-dates and its co-manufactured offerings so a plan sponsor will adopt that Principal target-fund fund as their plan’s QDIA. Through that investment, a participant will have multiple data points fed through the advice engine—including any nonqualified balances or a defined benefit balance—to get a recommendation on how they should allocate between the different target-date vintages in that series.

Capital Group, meanwhile, has a personalized target-date solution called Target Date Plus, which is also powered by Morningstar to create glide paths based on five data points from the recordkeeper: age, account balance, income, employer contribution and employee contribution. In September, T. Rowe Price introduced Personalized Retirement Manager, a customized investment allocation built on its TDF asset allocation methodology with Morningstar. Vanguard also continues to consider further customizations to its TDF series, most recently with an additional opt-in landing point for its glide path that contains a slightly higher equity allocation.

“That was really a recognition that investors in a plan usually have a pretty wide range of different needs and circumstances,” Brian Miller, a senior investment specialist and head of TDF product management at Vanguard, told Planadviser in September. “We wanted to have plan participants—and plans in general—have the ability to have two different landing points, depending on those individual needs.”

Looking Forward

Will personalization replace the single-glide path solution? Craig Duglin, senior vice president of product management at Capital Group, doesn’t think so. But he believes there will be adoption of more personalized solutions.

“There’s a real efficiency to how we and a couple others have developed the target-date solutions and it’s just a really good default,” Duglin says. “Maybe personalization will remain as an opt-in.”

As technology evolves, so will the customization of TDFs.

“Right now, the personalization engine is going to pull what’s available on the recordkeeper’s database and there’s a set of five or six factors that are pretty common,” Martel says. “But over time, with technology becoming better, we’re hoping there is going to be more that becomes available.”

The ability to customize will open the door for other changes to TDFs in the future, Martel adds, such as more TDFs incorporating annuities into their design. We will also continue to see the evolution of partnerships between recordkeepers that store the data and providers.

“Ten years ago we probably wouldn’t have been able to facilitate the use of that data into a more personalized solution,” Martel says. “Now effectively we’re moving [from] a world where there was one glide path for everybody to a world where there might be thousands of glide paths into a single plan.”

More on this topic:

Beyond TDFs
Nuts & Bolts: Best Practices in Target-Date-Fund Selection
Catching Up With PIMCO’s Personalized Target-Date Funds
Q&A: Seeking a More Perfect TDF
TDFs With Annuity Options Set to Proliferate

«