ERISA Lawsuit Calls Out TDF Fees and Revenue-Sharing

A participant in Safeway Inc.’s 401(k) plan is suing the plan sponsor, its benefits committee and its recordkeeper for breaching their fiduciary duties and/or engaging in ERISA prohibited transactions.

A participant in Safeway Inc.’s 401(k) plan is suing the plan sponsor, its benefits committee and its recordkeeper, now Empower Retirement, for breaching their fiduciary duties and/or engaging in transactions prohibited by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) in connection with target-date funds (TDFs) managed by JP Morgan Asset Management (JPM) and offered as investment options in the plan.

In a statement to PLANADVISER, Empower said, “We won’t comment on pending litigation; however, we will say that we believe this suit and the claims it makes are without merit, and we will defend the matter vigorously.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

According to the complaint, the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to plan participants by selecting JPM target-date funds as investment options for the plan that charged excessive fees as compared to readily-available alternatives.

In addition, in connection with selecting the JPM target-date funds as investment options for the plan, the Safeway defendants also agreed to a “revenue-sharing” arrangement whereby a large portion of the fees charged by the JPM target-date funds and paid by participants was kicked back to the recordkeeper. The complaint says the revenue-sharing was to compensate the recordkeeper for recordkeeping services, but the amount of the fees was far in excess of the reasonable value of such services and thus defendants engaged in transactions prohibited by ERISA.   

The lawsuit alleges that during the relevant times, the JPM Smartretire Passiveblend Funds charged participants in the Plan who invested in such funds between 47 and 50 basis points of the amount invested as a management fee. By comparison, the Blackrock Lifepath Index funds which were replaced by the JPM Smartretire Passiveblend Funds in 2011 charged only a 13 basis point fee.

In addition, the lawsuit says alternatives to the JPM Smartretire Passiveblend Funds that were readily available as of 2011 also charged substantially lower fees. It notes that target-date funds offered by Vanguard, for example, charge about a 15 basis point fee. Also, net of management fees, the Vanguard target-date funds substantially outperformed the comparable JPM Smartretire Passiveblend Funds.

NEXT: Recordkeeping fees too high

According to the complaint, the management fee charged to participants for investing in the JPM Smartretire Passiveblend Funds included a 20 basis point revenue-sharing payment to the recordkeeper. During the relevant time period, the number of participants with account balances in the three 401(k) plans invested through the Safeway Inc. Defined Contribution Plans Master Trust steadily declined. “In other words, [the recordkeeper] received greater and greater revenue for providing the same services to a smaller number of participants,” the complaint says.

The lawsuit also alleges the revenue-sharing payments generated from the JPM Smartretire Passiveblend Funds were far from the sole source of the recordkeeper’s compensation for services. “These companies also received revenue sharing payment from other investments offered through the Plan and direct payments from the Plan for recordkeeping services,” it says.

According to the complaint, the Safeway defendants could have obtained recordkeeping services at a much lower rate, had they negotiated a per-participant payment for recordkeeping rather than an asset-based charge or negotiated a lower asset-based charge when it became clear that the amounts invested in the JPM Smartretire Passiveblend Funds were growing so quickly so as to generate a windfall for the recordkeeper. “The Safeway Defendants breached the duty of prudence in connection with agreeing to the revenue-sharing arrangement for the JPM Smartretire Passiveblend Funds because a reasonable investigation would have found that a per-participant fee for recordkeeping services as opposed to an asset-based revenue-sharing arrangement would have resulted in lower fees,” the complaint says.

The lawsuit is seeking declaration that the defendants breached ERISA fiduciary duties and an order compelling the Safeway defendants to reimburse participants for all losses resulting from their breaches of fiduciary duty, as well as an order awarding damages to participants, with interest as provided by law.

The complaint in Lorenz v. Safeway Inc. et. al. is here.

New SEC Rule Impacts Adviser Reporting

The SEC adopted new final rules to enhance information reported by registered investment advisers under Form ADV. 

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments to several Investment Advisers Act rules and the investment adviser registration and reporting form (Form ADV) to enhance the reporting and disclosure of information by investment advisers.

According to SEC, the amendments will improve the quality of information that investment advisers provide to investors and the commission. 

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

“These amendments are an important step in a series of rulemakings to enhance the SEC’s monitoring and regulation of the asset management industry,” says SEC Chair Mary Jo White.  “Requiring investment advisers to report this additional information will provide investors and the Commission with a better understanding of the risk profile of each adviser and the industry as a whole.”

In short, the amendments will require investment advisers to provide additional information regarding their separately managed account business, “including aggregate data related to the use of borrowings and derivatives, and information about other aspects of their advisory business, including branch office operations and the use of social media.”  In addition, the amendments “will facilitate streamlined registration and reporting for groups of private fund adviser entities operating a single advisory business.”  

Further amendments to Investment Advisers Act Rule 204-2 will require advisers to maintain additional records related to the calculation and distribution of performance information. According to the SEC, these records will be useful to the commission’s examinations staff in evaluating adviser performance claims, “and could reduce the incidence of misleading or fraudulent advertising and communications by advisers.”

By way of background, on May 20, 2015, SEC proposed amendments to Part 1A of Form ADV in three areas: revisions to fill certain data gaps and to provide additional information about investment advisers, including their separately managed account business; amendments to incorporate a method for private fund adviser entities operating a single advisory business to register with us using a single Form ADV; and clarifying, technical and other amendments to existing items and instructions.

“Several of the amendments to Form ADV relate to separately managed accounts,” SEC explains. “These amendments will require advisers to provide certain aggregate information about separately managed accounts that they advise. Other amendments to Form ADV that we are adopting are designed to improve the depth and quality of information that we collect on investment advisers, facilitate our risk monitoring initiatives and assist our staff in its risk-based examination program. Moreover, because Form ADV is available to the public on our website, these amendments also are intended to provide advisory clients and the public additional information regarding registered investment advisers.”

NEXT: Breaking down the rulemaking 

SEC officials note the are also adopting amendments to Part 1A that will “provide a more efficient method for the registration on one Form ADV of multiple private fund adviser entities operating a single advisory business (umbrella registration).”

“The SEC staff has provided guidance to private fund advisers regarding umbrella registration, and the amendments to incorporate umbrella registration into Form ADV will make the availability of umbrella registration more widely known to advisers,” SEC explains. “Uniform filing requirements for umbrella registration in Form ADV will provide more consistent data about, and create a clearer picture of, groups of private fund advisers that operate as a single business.”

The last set of amendments to Part 1A of Form ADV includes clarifying, technical and other amendments that are based on SEC staff’s experience with the form and responding to inquiries from advisers and their service providers. The amendments are designed to make it easier for advisers to understand and complete the form.

Separate from Form ADV, SEC is also adopting amendments to several Advisers Act rules: “First, we are adopting amendments to the books and records rule, rule 204-2, to require advisers to make and keep supporting documentation that demonstrates performance calculations or rates of return in any written communications that the adviser circulates or distributes, directly or indirectly, to any person. Advisers also will be required to maintain originals of all written communications received and copies of written communications sent by them related to the performance or rate of return of any or all managed accounts or securities recommendations.” Finally, SEC is further adopting “several technical amendments to rules under the Advisers Act to remove transition provisions that were adopted in conjunction with previous rulemaking initiatives, but that are no longer necessary.”

“We received 50 comment letters on our proposals, most of which were from investment advisers, trade or professional organizations, law firms and consultants. Commenters generally supported the goals of the proposal,” SEC concludes. “The majority of comments focused on reporting of separately managed accounts and umbrella registration. Several commenters supported collection of information on separately managed account clients, but many raised concerns about the public availability of the information and reporting on derivatives and borrowings. A diverse group of commenters supported umbrella registration. Commenters also generally supported the amendments to certain Advisers Act rules. We are adopting the proposed amendments with several modifications to address commenters’ concerns.”

The amendments have been published in full on the SEC website, and advisers will need to begin complying with the amendments on October 1, 2017. 

«