Engaged Participants Also Need Help

When it comes to retirement planning communication, plan sponsors must remember to lend a helping hand to disengaged and engaged employees alike.

It is equally as important for employers to place emphasis on communicating with employees enrolled in the retirement savings plan as it is to engage non-active and new employees, according to Manning & Napier’s white paper, “Increased Savings: The Best Risk Management Tool in the Retirement Readiness Equation.”

Participants that proactively enroll in their employer’s retirement savings plan likely recognize the importance of saving, and engaging with currently enrolled employees allows employers the opportunity to pass along valuable information to help motivate participants to potentially increase their savings rates, the paper said.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

But it’s easy for participants to delay increasing their savings rates in order to tend to what they consider more urgent responsibilities, such as paying for housing, food and student loans. These types of financial pressures have been a mainstay in participants’ lives and are likely a major reason why average contribution rates to defined contribution plans have remained low, ranging from 4.2% to 5.6%, among non-highly compensated participants over the past 20 years, the paper said.

Plan sponsors should target different age groups instead of using a blanket communication tactic, Mary Moglia-Cannon, JD, senior analyst and portfolio strategist at Manning & Napier, toldPLANADVISER. In addition, plan sponsors may want to consider basing communication around life events—for instance, a young employee might be getting married or buying his first home, whereas a middle-aged employee may be paying for a child’s college tuition. (See “Targeting Generational Issues in Retirement Education.”)

“We think plan sponsors are thinking about [communicating with employees] more than they ever have,” Moglia-Cannon said.

(Cont’d…)

When it comes to communicating with engaged participants, plan sponsors can also:

  • Promote the use of voluntary automatic escalation features to combat savings rates that have not been increased over the years. Even highly engaged participants may set their initial contribution rate and fail to revisit the decision often enough as the demands of daily life get in the way, the white paper said. Features that make it easier for participants to automatically increase contribution rates whenever they receive salary raises or bonuses can have similar effects on savings rates.
  • Alter employee match provisions to encourage higher savings rates. Participants commonly contribute only the minimum amount necessary to receive the full employer matching contribution. Because the employer match is a key motivator for participants to contribute to a retirement savings plan, employers should consider stretching the match to a higher percentage of pay. For example, the typical match of $0.50 per $1 up to 6% could be restructured to $0.25 per $1 up to 12% of a participant’s salary, at no additional cost to the employer. It’s becoming increasingly common to restructure the match, Moglia-Cannon said.
  • Provide employees with helpful tools and tips. Arming participants with tools that help them better understand whether or not they are on the path to retirement success can be useful in changing participant behavior and improving retirement outcomes, the white paper said.
  • Provide holistic assessments of participants’ financial wellness. Plan sponsors are recognizing that participants need help with overall financial planning, not just guidance with their 401(k) account, the paper said. Plan sponsors should consider offering employees a broad range of educational products and services—from the introduction of basic finance-related concepts to help them make better decisions in the future, such as the importance of maintaining a good credit rating, to more personalized solutions such as insurance and estate planning.

More information about the white paper is available here.

Debunking SRI Myths

Socially responsible investing (SRI) has not yet hit the mainstream, but perhaps that is because of the myths about SRI that still exist.

Darren Zagarola, a certified financial planner and CPA with EKS Associates in Princeton, New Jersey, told PLANADVISER the most common myth is that SRI funds’ returns underperform the broader universe of funds. According to Zagarola, this is probably the reason—other than the lack of understanding about how available SRI options are—that more investors and plan sponsors do not use SRI.  

Zagarola noted there is much research that shows returns are the same for SRI funds as any other funds, and in addition, findings from the U.S. SIF Foundation that one in nine investors are using SRI, and that number is growing, supports the evidence that returns are comparable. “People won’t put money into funds that are not giving them equal returns,” he said.  

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Many investors think there is a premium to invest in SRI products. Zagarola said the reason for this myth is expense ratios for SRI funds are slightly higher than for large-cap mutual funds. He explained that SRI fund expense ratios are more in line with small-cap and international mutual funds because more research needs to be done for SRI products just as with small-cap and international. “So in comparison, SRI fund expenses are in line with those of other funds that use more research,” he said.  

Many investors also think they cannot create a fully diversified portfolio with SRI products only. However, Zagarola pointed out that socially responsible companies are everywhere—from the small-cap to large-cap to international markets. There are more opportunities now than 10 years ago. He noted that data from the U.S. SIF Foundation shows there are now more than 360 SRI mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) available and the number keeps growing. The total number of SRI products has grown from 493 to 720, including alternatives such as hedge funds. According to Zagarola, once investors get past 20 or 25 holdings in a portfolio, they are not getting more risk management or diversification.

(Cont’d…)

Perhaps because SRI has not hit the mainstream, many investors think it is a new concept. “This is probably the most-quoted myth of SRI,” Zagarola said. However, he pointed out that the concept grabbed hold of investors in the ’70s and ’80s with the Dow chemical protest and the anti-apartheid movement, so it’s not new, just growing in popularity.   

SRI is not only for the wealthy as some believe. The introduction of SRI mutual funds and ETF products make SRI available for every person. Zagarola said it is up to advisers to make sure plan sponsors know they are available. As advisers get to know their clients and clients’ values, they can make recommendations for SRI. The plan sponsor may have a religious, social or corporate governance focus. “People tend to think they cannot make a difference,” Zagarola said, but he noted examples of protest movements in the past that made social of ethical differences to countries and companies.  

A portfolio does not have to be 100% in SRI to meet values. The example Zagarola gives is, “I recycle, but I don’t recycle everything.” While an investor’s portfolio should not be 10% in SRI products and the rest in sin funds, it does not have to be 100% in SRI products to make a difference.   

Zagarola noted how socially responsible investing is turning into a sustainable and responsible investing movement (see “Running the Fund: Win-Win”). “An investment doesn’t need to be called an SRI product to be sustainable, a great company is sustainable,” he said.  

Zagarola concluded it is up to advisers to make sure plan sponsors know the truth about SRI and how available products are, and include SRI in investment policy statements (IPSs) if so desired.

«