Both Ends of Financial Wellness Spectrum Benefit from Coaching

Coaching seemed to work best for those with the most need—whether due to a strong financial position, or those struggling with financial stress.

According to Financial Finesse’s “Workplace Financial Wellness in America” report released Wednesday, workers either with numerous financial struggles or those with positive financial situations reported the greatest improvements from working with a financial coach.

In the category of those struggling, Financial Finesse found that 5.2% of respondents said they were in “crisis,” which was reflected by a financial wellness score below three. The 2023 figure is a one-percentage point increase from the year before, which was at 4.2%. Among those in financial crisis who initially failed to achieve stated milestones, 36% are now able to meet basic needs, 28% know their credit score, 21% have set beneficiaries for retirement accounts, and 18% now have health insurance coverage in place. 

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

“Optimizers,” or those who had a financial wellness scored eight or above, made up just 4.1% of respondents in 2023, up from 2.4% in 2022. In this group, 25% now have disability coverage in place, 23% have conducted an investment fee analysis, 22% have made sure investments are allocated appropriately, and 21% have put a healthcare directive in place.

Financial coaching, as it turned out, was beneficial for both optimization and people with financial difficulties:

  • After working with a financial coach, over half of employees (52%) who previously reported high or overwhelming levels of financial stress now report little or no financial stress.
  • The number of people with a financial score higher than five, those in the planning or optimizing stages, increased by 53% in 2023 after engaging with a financial coach.

Financial Finesse stated that this implies that rather than having to work on meeting their immediate financial demands, these employees may now concentrate on their long-term financial goals.

Financial Finesse’s “Think Tank Research: Best Practices,” also released on Wednesday, suggested combating workers financial stress by taking advantage of “decision moments,” in which employers can highlight access to financial coaching when employees are thinking about their finances.

“This includes open enrollment, when annual bonuses are paid, during stock purchase periods, when retirement plan loans or withdrawals are requested, or when facing a major life event (e.g., marriage, having a baby),” the research stated.

Overall, when compared to 2022, the first financial wellness score for individuals who were new to their employer’s financial wellness program decreased only slightly in 2023. Less than half of American workers would be regarded as financially resilient, even though the majority live at or below their means. Only roughly one-third of people feel they are on track for retirement due to the difficulty of saving for emergencies due to rising costs of living.

 

Financial wellness score

A lifestyle below their means

No high-interest debt

A 3+ month emergency fund

On track for retirement

2022

4.65

57%

50%

43%

32%

2023

4.61

57%

48%

42%

35%

The “Workplace Financial Wellness in America” survey is based on the analysis of 52,553 employees who interacted with Aimee, Financial Finesse’s AI-enabled virtual financial coach, between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2023. The Financial Wellness score is measured by a series of questions from Aimee, which assigns a score of one to 10, with one indicating no financial wellness and 10 indicating optimal financial wellness. “Think Tank Research: Best Practices” draws from the findings of “Workplace Financial Wellness in America.”

Correction: Updates timing of participant results.

EFE Finds Increased Participant Inputs to Managed Accounts

The managed account provider says analysis reveals personal data inputs doubled over the past decade.

Edelman Financial Engines says the number of participants adding personal inputs into managed account offerings has doubled over the past ten years in an analysis of more than one million of its members released Wednesday.

The number of participants providing personal data and preferences to guide managed account investments rose from 33% in 2014 to 74% in 2023, according to an EFE analysis.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

The firm attributed some of that growth to more customized services in managed accounts, such as adding information from spouses, estimating retirement expenses and adding other income sources such as pensions and IRAs.

“From working with employers and employees for more than two decades, we have learned how to drive personalization with employees through our omni-channel experience and communications,” says EFE’s Kelly O’Donnell, president of employer solutions.For example, prompts at the right time and place to remind members to take full advantage of the employer 401(k) match have meaningfully changed outcomes.”

While managed accounts have been available for over two decades, uptake has been tempered in part by concerns from plan sponsors and their advisers that participants do not engage enough for the value to meet the additional costs as compared to options such as target date funds. The total in-plan managed account market stands at more than $434 billion, according to Cerulli Associates, with EFE noting it holds about 45% of the market and 1.2 million program members across 700 employers.

“A target-date fund is a product, not a service,” O’Donnell says. “You can bridge the difference in fees between a TDF and managed accounts when you look at the benefits in their entirety. Both solutions will diversify your portfolio. However, a TDF won’t consider your full financial picture and goals.”

Another critical selling point of managed accounts, she says, is access to a licensed financial adviser—especially when dealing with life changes or times of market volatility.

“When markets drop, a TDF is just a portfolio and doesn’t have an adviser to call to help you navigate questions about the markets and potentially keep you from making an emotional mistake,” she says.

In its report, EFE also noted that managed account members are contributing 9.1% of their income to retirement, as compared to 7.8% for non-members, and 7.4% for people investing in a single TDF.

EFE’s managed account fees range up to .60% and vary according to size of the plan, the account balance, and the services being offered. The average TDF fee is about .32%, according to Morningstar.

Personalized Experience

O’Donnell touts the chance for managed accounts to personalize risk tolerance and retirement goals for members both to create investment strategies and make retirement income projections.

“Employees want to know if they are on target or not, and if they need to make any adjustments to their plans,” she says. “Our experience also includes interactive online levers for members to see in real-time how changes in contributions or retirement age might impact projected income goals.”

Bringing in outside accounts is also important, she says, as employees like to see all their financial information in one place, and it allows the provider to “appropriately diversify their 401(k) when we have more holistic information.”

In its report, EFE also noted that older participants closer to retirement are more likely to use managed account services. Forty-seven percent of managed account members are 50 or older as compared to 29% for TDFs, the firm found.

Source: Edelman Financial Engines

“While managed accounts work for employees of all ages, we find that the benefits are greatest as financial complexity increases,” O’Donnell says. “As employees approach retirement, they are facing many critical decisions like how to optimize a retirement income strategy, when to claim Social Security and how to best plan for Medicare expenses.”

O’Donnell says the use of managed accounts by older workers is not yet being driven by the proliferation of hybrid qualified default investment alternatives, which are designed to shift participants from TDFs into a managed account when they get closer to retirement. She called the product a “mostly untapped option that has real potential to improve retirement readiness,” by, for instance, “defaulting a segment of near-retirees who have a poor income replacement ratio into a managed account.” 

AI Assistance

EFE forecasts further personalization of products in part driven by artificial intelligence. O’Donnell notes its potential to make financial planning more accessible and bespoke to savers of all levels, with some implementations happening soon.

“In the near-term, I see AI creating a more interactive experience and putting in front of individuals content that is specific to them,” she says. “You can imagine a message personalized to their situation, like ‘You’re leaving money on the table. You only need to save X dollars a week more to get the full match from your employer.’”

EFE’s report analyzed more than one million managed account users across different ages and career stages amid large employers across industries and among various retirement plan recordkeepers.

The firm has also recently been expanding its wealth management footprint to provide services beyond DC managed accounts. In May, it announced a deal to acquire Soundmark Wealth Management, and in 2023 it announced the acquisition of New England Pension Plan Systems, a wealth and retirement shop overseeing $1.5 billion in assets.

«