Employee Debt and Financial Wellness Education a Hotspot for Employees

In addition to deciding whether to save for retirement or pay down debt, employees should think about how much they can contribute to an emergency short-term savings.


A recent study sponsored by Franklin Templeton found that a sizeable majority (67%) of employees have reassessed what they want from their employers due to the COVID-19 pandemic—with nearly half (44%) having considered leaving or actually deciding to leave their jobs over the past year.

The “Voice of the American Worker” study suggests that there has never been a more urgent time for companies to evaluate their benefit offerings and consider ways to evolve their benefits and compensation strategies.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Despite trying to optimize across all three elements of well-being—mental, physical and financial health—workers today still don’t feel much control, especially over their financial health. The study noted that 83% of U.S. workers carry at least one form of debt, with many employees carrying several forms of debt concurrently, including credit card debt (54%), mortgage or home equity debt (40%), utility, cell phone or auto loan debt (38%), personal loan debt (21%) and student loan debt (19%).

“If people were robots, they should probably pay down particularly any debt with a higher interest rate than what they would reasonably expect to make on a market return if they were investing,” says Matthew Eickman, Qualified Plan Advisors national retirement practice leader. “If people were robots, they would just make all the logical decisions, and at the end of the day they would come out ahead financially.”

Of course, as Eickman observes, people are not robots. When it comes to deciding to pay down debt or save for retirement, Eickman says, there are some behavioral advantages in starting to save at a younger age, mainly because it develops the mentality of being a saver. Additionally, having some amount of savings after debt is paid off is often more emotionally appealing than waiting to save and starting from zero at an older age.

The reality for most people is that it makes sense to both save for retirement and pay down debt, but usually at different proportions, depending on the type of debt and the associated interest rates, Eickman says.

“There’s something demoralizing about paying off your debt from age 25 to 35 and being age 35 and realizing that you have $0 saved for retirement,” Eickman says. “That’s why doing a little bit of both makes sense.”

Lack of employee wellbeing has an impact on their work, the study suggests. Among employees who currently carry debt, many say their levels of debt are impactful on their lives, jobs and decision-making. This type of financial stress is a significant contributor to workers’ lack of overall well-being.

Employees are interested in financial management and education benefits, the study notes. The study shows that 56% of workers are interested in having access to a financial professional, 62% want financial planning tools such as an online dashboard or recommendations for retirement savings, and 52% say they are interested in non-retirement-focused financial education and resources.

Its critical for advisers to recognize that although there are electronic tools and phone banks to provide participants’ assistance, people still like to talk to an actual person about their finances, Eickman says. The nation’s best advisers are either figuring out how to have the resources around them internally, or they are partnering with outside organizations to do the financial wellness work.

“If you think back to March 2020 to see how quickly Congress put together the Cares Act to provide participants access to a coronavirus-related distribution of up to $100,000, it really highlights the idea that the financial situation for most Americans isn’t built to withstand emergencies,” Eickman says. “So, in addition to questions about whether to pay down debt or save for retirement, having an emergency short-term savings is the third pillar of what employees need to do to get their financial house in order.”

Lawmakers Debut Pension Tracker Showing Rescued Plans

Legislation passed last year allows multiemployer plans in danger of becoming insolvent to apply for funds to cover participant benefit payments.  

Members of the House Education and Labor Committee unveiled a multiemployer pension rescue tracker highlighting plans that have received special financial assistance. 

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 created the special financial assistance program, managed by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, to protect severely underfunded pension plans that are in danger of becoming insolvent. ARPA allows such plans to receive a lump sum of money to make benefit payments to participants for the next 30 years, or through 2051.

The tracker spotlights the number of participants who receive benefits from defined benefit plans that have been protected—8,088 participants in pension plans covering 170 businesses.

“The Committee’s Multiemployer Pension Rescue Tracker will help illustrate the impact of this transformative solution,” says Rep. Robert Scott, D-Virginia, chair of the House Education and Labor Committee.

Prior to the passage of ARPA, the PBGC multiemployer program was projected to become insolvent in FY 2026. The agency has said the multiemployer plan program is now likely to remain solvent for more than 30 years, due to the enactment of ARPA.

PBGC has published an interim final rule, with guidance for multiemployer plan assistance, and the IRS also released a notice for plan sponsors requiring plans to reinstate certain previously suspended benefits as a condition of receiving assistance. However, PBGC began accepting applications for special financial assistance from pensions before a final rule was published.

Late last year, the PBGC greenlit funds for the first SFA application.

On a SFA questions and answers page, the PBGC said that if a final rule were to make any changes affecting the amount of SFA a plan would receive, this will not reduce the amount of assistance payable to any plan that successfully submitted its initial application before the publication of the final rule.

The PBGC has currently approved five applications from pension plans based in New York, New Jersey and Oregon that were either already insolvent or projected to run out of money this year, the tracker shows.

«