Efforts Needed to Address Women’s Retirement Readiness Obstacles

Women’s path to a financially secure retirement is filled with many obstacles, a global survey shows.

In a webcast about a new report from Aegon UK and the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies, Catherine Collinson, president of the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies, said a survey of more than 16,000 people in 15 countries revealed that women’s positive retirement aspirations are undermined by lifestyle differences. Women are more likely to take time out of workforce or work part-time to take care of family, and they tend to have lower salaries. “These things affect lifetime savings and long-term retirement readiness, especially since women tend to live longer than men,” Collinson said.

The study shows women are more than twice as likely as men to be working in part-time jobs–jobs that often provide few, if any, retirement plan benefits. In addition, women, on average, earn about 27% less than men.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

On average globally, women envision entering full retirement at the age of 62. But, there are big variations among countries. In the United States, women expect to retire around the age of 66. Overall, women expect they’ll need an average of 71% of their working-age incomes after they retire; in the U.S., the figure is 67%. Collinson says these findings are somewhat shaped by national policies in each country.

Asked what words they associate most with retirement, survey respondents used positive words most often, such as “leisure” (45%) and “freedom” (39%). However, one-quarter (24%) of women associated retirement with “insecurity” and almost one-fifth (18%) with “poverty.”

Only 20% of women overall feel they are on course with saving for a secure retirement, but twice this number (40%) simply do not know whether they are on course or not. In the U.S., 24% of women feel they are on course, and 43% do not know.

According to the survey, women generally feel responsible for their own retirement income, are aware of the need to plan financially for their retirement and understand retirement planning matters. However, this does not often enough lead to action in the form of planning and saving. Only 10% of women say they feel “very prepared” for retirement and are confident they are already saving enough. Higher income earners, those with a greater understanding of financial matters, and those with more developed planning skills are most likely to belong to this group. More than twice as many women (23%) say the opposite: they feel “very unprepared” and are hardly saving at all. In the U.S., 12% say they are saving enough, and 23% say they are hardly saving at all.

Overall, more than one-third of women (36%) claim to be dedicated savers whose approach is always to make sure they are saving for retirement (which is not necessarily the same as “saving enough”). These women tend to be older with an understanding of financial matters and highly developed financial planning skills. The majority of women, however, do not fall into this group. Younger women, for example, are more likely to be “occasional savers” or to belong to the 24% of women who are “not currently saving although intend to."  In the U.S., 16% say they only save occasionally; 15% are not saving, but intend to; and 15% are not saving, but have in the past.

For two-thirds (67%) of women, a lack of money to invest is a major obstacle to saving for retirement. The survey found women feel dependent on their spouse’s or partner’s income in later life. More than half (54%) of women who are married or living with a partners say that their spouse/partner will be “very” or “extremely” important as a source of financial support during retirement. Further, only 12% of women say that they do not expect their spouse to be an important source of retirement income.

Overall, 38% of women fear they won’t have enough savings for retirement (compared with 30% of men). Women are also less optimistic when it comes to medical expenses—36% believe they will be able cover medical costs in retirement, compared to 43% of men.

Increasing access to workplace retirement plans and a more flexible retirement is the way forward, the report recommends. Collinson said 38% of women versus 45% of men said their employers provide access to a workplace retirement plan.

The survey shows that 74% of women agree that governments should encourage employers to automatically enroll all their employees into a retirement plan. Only 6% of women disagree. Overall, 62% of women say automatic enrollment is “very or somewhat appealing.”

In addition, the survey found only a minority of women (29%) expect to stop work immediately at retirement. In the U.S., it’s only 17%. A clear majority now expect to have some form of phased transition into retirement.

Collinson noted that the main reasons women give for working longer are not financial, but because they enjoy their work and want to remain active.

According to Angela Seymour-Jackson, managing director, Workplace Savings, Aegon UK, the report includes recommendations for efforts to improve women’s retirement readiness. In addition to implementing automatic enrollment in their workplace retirement plans, employers can implement automatic escalation features. The report also recommends plan sponsors extend, where necessary, workplace retirement plans to cover part-time workers thereby providing more employees, particularly women, the ability to save for retirement.

The report recommends both government and employer policies to improve retirement incomes for women while facilitating a more flexible workforce aligned with the unique needs of women:

  • Provide for equal maternity and paternity leave, making it easier for men to share in caregiving responsibilities;
  • Provide assistance and information about caregiving services;
  • Provide Social Security or government “credits” for unpaid time spent by individuals in caregiving roles;
  • Expand the entitlement age range for receipt of government retirement benefits in all countries to reflect increasing longevity and workers’ preferences for a phased transition into retirement;
  • Encourage the implementation of age-friendly workplace policies in recognition of the potential contribution of employees at all ages and the value of a multi-generational workforce;
  • Provide vocational training opportunities and support to help women remain economically active longer into their retirement; and
  • Encourage the implementation of phased workplace retirement programs, which enable workers to stay in the workforce and transition gradually to retirement.

The report says efforts should be made to facilitate the offering of investment advice inside the workplace, particularly in the context of workplace retirement plans. In addition, efforts should be made to encourage the role of investment advisers in providing personalized retirement strategies both inside and outside the workplace. Finally, the report recommends stepping up financial literacy courses in schools and workplaces

The financial industry and plan sponsors could do better at targeting and educating women, Seymour-Jackson said. Financial education should include household budgeting as well as long-term savings, she suggested. And, she said, education should be simple and engaging and available through digital devices.

The report, “The Changing Face of Retirement Women: balancing family, career & financial security,” can be downloaded from the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies website or the Aegon website.

GAO Weighs Potential IRA Limits

Reaching $25 million in an individual retirement account (IRA) might sound like a pipedream, but some Americans have managed to do just that.

A recent report from the Government Accountability Office finds an estimated 43 million taxpayers had individual retirement accounts as of tax year 2011—the most recent year with full data available—with a total reported fair market value of $5.2 trillion. The report shows few taxpayers had aggregated balances exceeding $5 million as of 2011. Generally, taxpayers with IRA balances greater than $5 million were joint filers who are 65 or older with adjusted gross incomes greater than $200,000.

As the GAO observes, there is no total statutory limit on IRA accumulations or rollovers from workplace defined contribution (DC) plans, which has allowed a small number of taxpayers to accumulate very large IRA balances. For example, while some 42.4 million people have IRAs with a balance below $1 million, only about 600,000 people have passed the $1 million mark—the vast majority of which are sitting somewhere between $1 million and $2 million.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Strikingly, GAO researchers suggest there are about 300 taxpayers with $25 million or more in their IRAs. These individuals likely reached the pinnacle of IRA success “by investing in assets unavailable to most investors—initially valued very low and offering disproportionately high potential investment returns if successful,” the report says.

According to the GAO, individuals who invest in these assets using certain types of IRAs “can escape taxation on investment gains.” For example, founders of companies who use IRAs to invest in non-publicly traded shares of their newly formed companies can realize many millions of dollars in tax-favored gains on their investment if the company is successful.

“With no total limit on IRA accumulations, the government forgoes millions in tax revenue,” the report explains. “The accumulation of these large IRA balances by a small number of investors stands in contrast to Congress’s aim to prevent the tax-favored accumulation of balances exceeding what is needed for retirement.”

The GAO goes on to explain that the federal government will forgo an estimated $17.45 billion in potentially collectable tax revenue from IRAs in 2014 alone. Much of the tax benefit goes to those with outsized IRA balances, researchers explain.

“To promote retirement savings without creating permanent tax-favored accounts for a small segment of the population, Congress should consider revisiting the use of IRAs to accumulate large balances and consider ways to improve the equity of the existing tax expenditure on IRAs,” GAO researchers suggest.

Options discussed in the report include placing limits on the types of assets permitted in IRAs; the minimum valuation for an asset purchased by an IRA; or the amount of assets that can be accumulated in IRAs and employer-sponsored plans that get preferential tax treatment.

Other suggestions raised by the GAO include improving the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) ability to detect and pursue compliance problems and prohibited transactions associated with undervalued assets sheltered in IRAs. To this end, the GAO recommends the commissioner of internal revenue should approve plans to fully compile and digitize new data from electronic and paper-filed Form 5498s to ensure the efficient use of the information on non-publicly traded IRA assets.

The report also urges the IRS and the wider Department of the Treasury to work with Congress on a legislative proposal to expand the statute of limitations on IRA compliance issues to help IRS pursue valuation-related misreporting and prohibited transactions that may have originated outside the current statute's three-year limitations window.

The GAO also makes suggestions for better educating taxpayers about taxation and investing rules for IRAs.

“To help taxpayers better understand compliance risks associated with certain IRA choices and improve compliance, the Commissioner of Revenue should, building on research data on IRAs holding non-public assets, identify options to provide outreach targeting taxpayers with non-public IRA assets and their custodians, such as reminder notices that engaging in prohibited transactions can result in loss of the IRA's tax-favored status,” the report continues.

The GAO also recommends the addition of an “explicit caution” in Publication 590 Individual Retirement Arrangements for taxpayers about the potential risk of committing a prohibited transaction when investing in non-publicly traded assets or directly controlling IRA assets.

The full 99-page report is available for download here, along with highlights and recommendations selected by the GAO.

«