Don’t Overlook Wholesaler Support

Advisers who encounter some thorny practice problems can turn to a wholesaler, findings of a LIMRA survey suggest.

According to the survey, “The Whole Team: The Importance of the Sales Desk in the Distribution Model,” both internal and external wholesalers are able to offer distinct value to advisers on a range of issues. The report offers new insights into advisers’ views of wholesaling strategies across manufacturers and intermediaries.

The key value of the survey, according to Breana Macken, senior analyst of distribution research at LIMRA and the author of the report, is that wholesalers are pollinators spreading the ideas of best practices. “In general, wholesalers are the bees, and the advisers are the flowers,” she tells PLANADVISER. “Wholesalers can help advisers grow their business.”

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The concept does work, Macken contends, and it happens in the following way. A wholesaler who has worked with one adviser then visits another. If the second adviser is struggling with a problem similar to one the first adviser was working on, the wholesaler  can offer suggestions based on this previous experience.

The survey found that advisers believe both internal and external wholesalers can answer their questions and solve their problems, Macken says. But they tend to believe that different types of wholesalers can offer different types of support. According to the survey, advisers believe internal sales teams are better at handling requests about planning tools, illustration support and basic service issues.  External wholesalers, in the opinion of most advisers, excel at point-of-sale assistance with a client and product positioning. Advisers were split fairly evenly in their opinions about other requests, such as identifying sales leads and new hire training.

This is not completely accurate, Macken says. “Who does what best depends on not only the request, but also the adviser’s preference, and the wholesalers themselves,” she points out.

Advisers are generally aware of the value-add services wholesalers  can offer; Macken notes that one of LIMRA’s statistics says 54% of advisers point to wholesalers as a success driver. But advisers may not see the range of their value. “A lot of advisers weren’t aware of every single thing a wholesaler can provide, and obviously, some wholesalers at smaller companies are not able to provide everything,” she says.

Value-Added Services

Wholesalers can help advisers with income and expense planning strategies for retirement, for example, Macken says, and share what other advisers are doing to address a client issue such as estate planning or the best strategies for claiming Social Security. They have access to a great deal of research from companies and to marketing materials to share with advisers. “Surprisingly, a lot of wirehouse folks are more aware of and take advantage of what wholesalers can offer,” Macken says.

Wholesalers can also assist with life insurance planning, asset management, IRA or tax planning. According to data from LIMRA, 66% of advisers turn to wholesalers for support with income and expense planning for retirement, and 49% of advisers want assistance with Social Security claiming strategies. Forty-one percent of advisers want help with planning for health, Medicare or long-term care. Less frequently called for are strategies for defined benefit (DB) pension claiming or annuitization strategies (21%) or required minimum distribution planning (14%).

Part of the reason advisers may not be aware of all the value wholesalers can add might lie with the actual manufacturers of financial services products, the report contends. Frequently, manufacturers’ primary focus is on which sales team (internal or external) is most efficient, but LIMRA’s report suggests they pay more attention to which wholesalers are actually providing the most value to advisers. “The reality is that both (wholesalers) remain integral in the minds of advisers,” she says. “And while it would certainly be less expensive for companies to rely exclusively on their internal teams, advisers tell us that wouldn’t be providing them with all the solutions they need.”

Some manufacturers continue to experiment with wholesaling platforms and strategies to maximize productivity and efficiency. “Whether it’s a hybrid wholesaling model or a team-based structure, for some companies, the strategy continues to be a work in progress,” Macken says. “And it basically comes down to companies trying to figure out what will work best for all of the parties involved.”

LIMRA, a global research, consulting and professional development firm, surveyed 900 financial professionals for the study and conducted 17 one-on-one interviews.

Reminder of 457(b) Plan Voluntary Correction Issues

The IRS has updated its website about 457(b) plan submissions to its voluntary compliance program.

Some plan sponsors, under limited circumstances, may submit requests for voluntary correction to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for their 457(b) retirement plans.

In an update on its website the IRS reminds plan sponsors that its Employee Plans Voluntary Compliance (VC) team will not consider any issue relating to the form of a written 457(b) plan document. Also, governmental plan sponsors do not have to make a submission to VC to voluntarily fix problems with their 457(b) plans.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

The agency says it has received several submissions alleging that a written 457(b) plan was not timely adopted or amended for some tax law or income tax regulation. VC will not issue closing agreements for these matters and will decline to process these requests and refund any payments. The IRS notes that the remedial amendment concepts and definitions in Revenue Procedure 2007-44 do not apply to 457(b) retirement plans.

Plan sponsors who want the IRS to review their 457(b) plan document or consider any other document form issue may request a private letter ruling.

Governmental plan sponsors may self-correct their 457(b) plans if they did not comply with the Internal Revenue Code or regulations. They have until the first day of the plan year that begins more than 180 days after the IRS notifies them of the failure to correct their plan failures. The agency says that, considering the time governmental entities have to self-correct plan errors, they may not need to make voluntary submissions to the IRS in most cases. However, if a governmental plan sponsor needs to request additional relief or simply wants IRS approval for a correction method for a non-plan document failure, they may make a submission to VC.

More information is here.

«