Cyberattacks More Prevalent Among Smaller Businesses

The unexpected economic downturn caused by COVID-19, along with the rapid shift to remote work, made those businesses with few resources even more vulnerable.


Small businesses are struggling with remote work, as exemplified by their rising vulnerability to cyberattacks.

In a survey by the Cyber Readiness Institute (CRI), half of the 412 small businesses interviewed shared concerns that remote work will lead to more cyberattacks. For companies with fewer than 20 employees, only 22% had offered additional cybersecurity training prior to commencing remote work operations. Just 33% provided “any cybersecurity training.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) states organizations are expected to know where sensitive data exist and restrict access to systems and data to only authorized users. Additionally, the SEC lists employee training and awareness as key components of cybersecurity practices. At the same time, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) requires any fiduciary serving retirement plans to treat plan assets with care and diligence. Attorneys increasingly agree that plan data can be considered a plan asset under ERISA.

Steve Pfundstein, chief technology officer and director of information technology (IT) at Summit Financial, says high monitoring costs and a lack of IT expertise are typically to blame for a lack of cybersecurity among smaller businesses.

“These employers are going to have much smaller and tighter budgets generally,” he says. “They’re often going to lack the expertise in house and aren’t likely to have people specifically focused on cybersecurity.”

Whereas large companies dedicate specific lines on their annual budget to cybersecurity practices, smaller companies may barely be able to afford basic anti-hacking systems. And the unexpected economic downturn caused by COVID-19, along with the overnight shift to remote work, made businesses with few resources even more vulnerable. According to the CRI survey, 59% of small business employers have allowed employees to use personal devices when working from home.

Pfundstein notes that many small employers have had to allow use of personal remote devices, as employees in their offices left their desktop computers during the rapid shift.

“A lot of companies didn’t have remote workers, so when they suddenly had to go remote, they were scrambling to find a solution,” Pfundstein says. “They just thought it would be a few weeks, but it’s turned into months.”

Even before the pandemic, a combination of factors made small businesses more susceptible to cyberattacks. A 2018 Ponemon Institute study found 67% of small and medium-sized businesses had experienced a cyberattack, while 58% had been victims of data breaches.

Brad Hering, client executive in the executive liability division at Marsh & McLennan Agency LLC, a firm specializing in risk prevention and insurance needs, notes that while all companies with a digital presence are vulnerable to cyberattacks, the limited resources associated with smaller businesses makes them an easier target.

“They are considered low-hanging fruit by cybercriminals,” he explains. “Any organization that has a digital presence or stores some volume of data is potentially exposed. Those with fewer resources or ability to protect themselves may be targeted even more.”

While it may be expensive to implement cybersecurity practices, the cost of handling a cyberattack can put a company out of business. A Hiscox Cyber Readiness Report released last year found that a hacking incident could cost businesses of all sizes an average of $200,000. As almost half of all online attacks are aimed at small businesses, according to data compiled by SCORE, a small business coaching and mentorship partner, experts say applying cybersecurity measures not only saves money, but offers some peace of mind.

“You don’t have to blow your whole budget on cybersecurity—you have to be able to balance the risk,” says Reiko Feaver, partner and attorney at Culhane Meadows. “But it’s key to get expert advice.”

As plan sponsors search for new advisers, recordkeepers, and service providers, more are including cybersecurity questions in the request for proposal (RFP) process. For advisers interested in adding cybersecurity to their RFP process, the SPARK Institute published a list of best practices in 2019 that it recommends when discussing cybersecurity capabilities to plan sponsors and consultants. The American Institute of Certified Public Accounts’ Employee Benefit Plan Audit Quality Center also released guidance in 2019 on protecting employee benefit plan records.

Advisers can also assess the procedures of all vendors serving in a plan, paying attention to what kinds of investments they are making in their cybersecurity technologies, says William Byron, southeast regional managing director with advisory practice NFP. The industry is seeing an increased trend in using voice print technology, he says, where an individual’s voice is treated like a fingerprint in unlocking devices or accounts.

Pfundstein notes that remote work may amplify cyberattack anxieties among small business employers, especially if employees are using personal computers and phones. Enabling multifactor authentication, encrypting sensitive company data, encouraging strong passwords and applying phishing tests strengthen internet safety—and it’s all possible from home.

“Enabling multifactor on any system, talking to the vendors and seeing what their options are can help minimize cyberattacks,” he says.

SEC Proposes Overhaul of Retail Fund Disclosure Framework

The proposed disclosure framework would feature ‘concise and visually engaging shareholder reports,’ according to the federal securities market regulator.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted Wednesday morning to propose significant modifications to its mutual fund and exchange-traded fund (ETF) disclosure framework.

The text of the proposal will soon be published in the Federal Register, and the public will have 60 days after the publication to offer feedback and formal comments.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

According to a fact sheet published by the SEC, the proposed disclosure framework would feature “concise and visually engaging shareholder reports that would highlight information that is particularly important for retail investors to assess and monitor their fund investments.”

Other aspects of the proposal would require streamlined reports to shareholders that would include, among other things, fund expenses, performance, illustrations of holdings and material fund changes. The proposal also significantly revises the content of these disclosure reports “to better align disclosures with developments in the markets and investor expectations.”

To that end, the proposal encourages funds to use graphic or text features—such as tables, bullet lists and Q&A formats—to promote effective communication. The SEC proposal, according to Chairman Jay Clayton, promotes “a layered and comprehensive disclosure framework” by continuing to make available online more detailed information that is currently required in shareholder reports.

Additionally, the proposed framework would provide an alternative approach to keeping investors informed about their ongoing fund investments. Instead of receiving both prospectus updates and shareholder reports, existing investors would receive only the streamlined shareholder report. Clayton says this would provide investors with timely and concise information to effectively assess and monitor their fund investments.

The proposal would further amend prospectus disclosure requirements to provide greater clarity and more consistent information regarding fees, expenses and principal risks, according to the fact sheet. To improve fee- and expense-related information more broadly, the proposal would amend investment company advertising rules “to promote more transparent and balanced statements about investment costs.”

The proposed advertising rule amendments would affect all registered investment companies and business development companies, the SEC fact sheet says.

The fact sheet states that the forthcoming proposal would, in part, replace the existing fee table in the summary section of a statutory prospectus with a simplified fee summary. It would also move the existing fee table to the statutory prospectus, for use by investors seeking additional details about fund fees, and it would replace certain terms in the current fee table with terms that may be clearer to investors.

The amendments also would refine current requirements for funds to disclose the “acquired fund fees and expenses” associated with investments in other funds. Specifically, the proposal would permit open-end funds that make limited investments in other funds to disclose the fees and expenses associated with those investments—i.e., “acquired fund fees and expenses”—in a footnote to the fee table and fee summary, rather than as a fee table line item.

Other changes are detailed in more depth in the fact sheet.

«