Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.
Compliance December 28, 2012
Court to Hear Case About Judges’ Retirement Age
The federal court system will hear a case challenging Pennsylvania’s
mandatory retirement age for judges.
Reported by Jay Polansky
Judge Gerald R. Solomon and Judge Arthur Tilson claim the provision – which sets the retirement age at 70 – violates their equal protection and due-process rights under the U.S. Constitution, the Herald-Standard reports.
Solomon, who is 70 years old, is opting to continue working as a senior judge, but he will not receive benefits like full-time judges.
The mandatory retirement age of judges varies throughout the United States. In November, a group of Pennsylvania judges also filed a lawsuit against the state regarding a mandatory retirement provision of state law (see “Pa. Judges Sue to Stop Mandatory Retirement”). That suit has also been transferred to federal court.
You Might Also Like:
Verizon Settles 401(k) Complaint for $30M
The agreement is still pending court approval but would end 7-year court case.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans Increasingly Include Noncompete Clauses
Employers are leveraging NQDCs for retention use at increasing rates, with 30% having a noncompete provision.
Investment Advisers Seek Talent Amid Staff Shortage
Investment advisers are prioritizing talent acquisition and retention due to client growth and strong business performance, according to Charles Schwab.