CLS, Riskalyze Roll Out Autopilot

An automated asset management platform from CLS Investments and Riskalyze is now live.

Autopilot, a lower-cost solution that allows advisers to combine client self-service capabilities with personalized service, mixes investment management by CLS with Risk Number technology from Riskalyze.

According to Aaron Klein, chief executive at Riskalyze, the Autopilot platform has been in testing for the last two months, with 500 advisers signed up. The technology helps advisers democratize access to their advice, Klein says, noting that the scalability of the technology can be a boon to advisers who serve 401(k) plans. “They can profitably serve those account holders with smaller assets,” Klein tells PLANADVISER. “It will demolish the barrier between smaller investors and access to the advice they need to thrive.”

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Klein notes that Autopilot dovetails nicely for rollovers of any size. “It gives advisers a very next generation platform to profitably roll those accounts over to another asset management strategy,” he says. “A lot of advisers serving 401(k) plans are only focused on the 5% of participants with outside assets. Now every participant can be a great prospective client, no matter the size of assets.” The minimum account balance is $5,000.

What makes the difference is the use of Riskalyze’s technology: Autopilot helps the investor to invest based on (LINK!) how much risk they’re comfortable with. “The data is very clear,” KIein explains. “If they’re invested that way, they stay invested and do better over the long run. Also, clients will always be able to see where they’re at. It’s a powerful way for a traditional adviser to instantly provide the same set of tech services that online services offer.”

NEXT: Autopilot puts live advisers on equal footing with robo advisers.

“It’s giving the live adviser the platform to beat a robo-adviser at its own game,” Klein says. With easy, 24-hour technology, clients have constant access for simpler transactions. He notes that he himself doesn’t always want to talk to a person. “I’d rather click through while I’m multi-tasking,” he says. “But when the going gets tough, I would really prefer being with a firm with people I can contact, and I don’t want to be just a number. This way, advisers get to give their clients the best of both worlds.”

For simple transactions and phone-based assistance on withdrawals or transfers, investors have access to a help desk staffed by CLS Asset Management, which does trading and rebalancing of accounts, helping advisers drive down costs.

The adviser’s cost for Autopilot is 25 basis points. “Every adviser is going to be different in terms of service," Klein says. "They can set fees wherever they want, but the cost is 25 bps, and includes the technology, asset management and client service all built in."

CLS Investments, in Omaha, is a third-party money manager and exchange traded fund (ETF) strategist. Riskalyze, in Auburn, California, is the innovator of the Risk Number, a quantitative way to pinpoint investor risk tolerance.

More information on Autopilot is on the firm’s website.  

3D Prosthetics? Yes! But Hold the 3D Steak

More people would rather use a prosthetic limb (77%) than eat a piece of food (23%) if both were both produced on a 3D printer, a survey finds.

Consumers were asked to rate how well businesses protect their customers and workers from risk, especially those created by new technologies such as 3D printers, in Chubb’s 2015 Consumer Perceptions of Business Risk Survey.

Many survey respondents were extremely or very concerned about the safety of materials used to manufacture 3D printed products (63%) and the durability and performance of those products (54%). Nevertheless, they were willing to consider using 3D printed items, including: a prosthetic limb, such as an arm, leg or hand (77%), shoes or clothing (64%), an automotive part (58%) and a house (51%).

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

A substantial majority of adults would allow businesses to fly drones and to require wearable technologies in the workplace: 59% of respondents said they would always or often permit drones to inspect utilities, facilities or property in remote areas. Only 48% would always or often permit them to take aerial pictures of property, 42% to fly a banner advertisement in a public space, and 37% to deliver a package to a customer’s home or business,.

Most respondents wanted companies to provide drone operators or employees with safety training (92%), ensure that the data or images captured do not violate an individual’s privacy rights (88%), and notify and obtain written consent from businesses and individuals subjected to surveillance or fly-overs (83%).

They were less in favor of using personal wearable technology on the manufacturing floor (41%), in corporate strategy meetings (39%), while driving for business purposes (39%), when meeting with clients (34%) or during a job interview or a performance review (25%).

Most respondents believed that businesses protect office (76%), manufacturing (64%) and retail workers (63%) from injury or harm extremely or very well. When it comes to protecting consumers’ financial and other personal information, retailers were thought to be doing the poorest job of any sector: 58% of respondents said they were not protecting the information, compared with 37% for financial institutions (37%) and 36% for health care organizations (36%).

Additional findings of the survey are:

  • 49% said employees should be able to always or often use their own personal wearable device while engaged in construction, utility or work-related physical activity;
  • 23% would be willing to eat 3D printed food;
  • 22% said they would always or often allow drones to follow and record employee activities during work hours; and
  • 8% would not use any 3D printed item.

«