BlackRock Offers Advice for Pension Plans in Low-Rate Environment

The investment firm recommends ‘capital efficient hedging instruments.’

As to why the funded status of the average U.S. corporate pension plan has fallen 5% year to date, there are three key lessons that pension plan sponsors should heed, said Gordon Readey, fixed income product strategist at BlackRock, speaking during a webinar on “Navigating a Low-Rate, High-Volatility Environment.”

“First of all, interest rates are difficult to predict and rates continue to disappoint,” Readey said. “Second, timely reporting of funded status is key. Third, even if you have the right reporting, you need the proper plan governance in place, be it a glide path or a frame of action. Plans that took these measures may have avoided the 5% decline.”

As to where the markets are now, we are seeing strong performance from fixed income and mediocre performance from equity assets, with 20-year-plus separate trading of registered interest and principal securities (STRIPS) up 22% year-to-date, long credit up 14%, long government up 13%, but the S&P 500 up a mere 3%, Readey said. “The flattening of the yield curve is critical to U.S. pension plans,” he said. “There have been record highs in duration and record lows in yield. This may call for rebalancing. While equity volatility has declined in the VIX Index, the MOVE Index is higher.” The VIX Index is the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) Volatility  Index, and the MOVE Index is the bond market’s equivalent of the VIX.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Therefore, pension plans should shift some of their assets to fixed income, said Stephan Bassas, head of Americas liability-driven investing at BlackRock. “Despite being historically low, U.S. fixed income yields are still attractive on a global basis, which is resulting in intensified international demand for U.S. fixed income assets,” Bassas said. “A high level of global liquidity supports demand for income, global excess reserves that can be estimated at up to $25 trillion.”

As a result of “U.S. fixed income valuations being at historical lows despite a resilient U.S. economy, hedging strategies are important,” he said. “The same goes for the corporate bond market. Foreign investors are primarily focused on investing in high-quality bonds, such as Treasuries and corporate bonds. However, the supply of long-dated corporate bonds has been reduced as a result of shrinking global M&A pipelines, putting narrowing pressure on spreads and curves.” This is a challenge for pension plans, since “long-dated corporate bonds are the backbone of pensions—but are facing a deficit of $43 brillion year-to-date compared to 2015.”

To counter this, pension plans need to adopt “spread acquisition strategies,” Bassas said. “Hedge against tail risk. You are seeing more acceptance of lower yields, which means insurance for higher yields is getting cheaper, resulting in attractive strategies.” In addition, “inflation-protected bonds are starting to make sense for pension plans.”

NEXT: Strategic actions

Gary Veerman, head of liability-driven investing at BlackRock Solutions, then set forth three strategic actions that the firm is currently recommending to its plan sponsor clients. First, Veerman said, “Understand your plan’s surplus risk level and underlying factor composition. Equity risk is compensated via the equity risk premium. On the other hand, nominal interest rate risk is arguably uncompensated relative to liability growth. Therefore, balance your risk budget toward markets that compensate investors.”

Second, use “capital efficient hedging instruments such as 20-plus-years Treasury STRIPS or similar capital efficient tools to replace market or long Treasury exposure,” he said. “STRIPS have twice the duration of long Treasuries and can deliver a higher hedge ratio.”

Third, “allocate more capital to long corporate bonds with or without increasing current exposure to interest rates. For those plan sponsors who are hesitant to move long because of low interest rates, an alternative approach is a custom long credit strategy where the plan sponsor acquires long corporate bonds, removing mortgages and high yield bonds, which are not appropriate hedging tools.”

Steps to Improve 403(b) Plans

While Rocaton Investment Advisors strongly advocates for 403(b) plans to consolidate recordkeepers, even those that don't can improve their plans.

For 403(b) plans that haven’t yet embarked on fund and provider consolidation, there remain opportunities to build participant-friendly and cost-effective plan designs, a paper from Rocaton Investment Advisors suggests.

Diane Improta, managing director at Rocaton Investment Advisors in Norwalk, Connecticut, says Rocaton is hoping plan sponsors who read the paper will embrace the idea of fund and provider consolidation as a way to improve outcomes for participants, and to maximize participant retirement readiness and cost-effectiveness of their plans.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

For those who haven’t consolidated providers, there are still best practices to improve outcomes for participants. Improta suggests plan sponsors consider automatic enrollment and deferral escalation, stretching their match formula and implementing strategies to reduce plan leakage

According to the paper, fiduciaries to Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)-governed plans should be diligent in fulfilling their fiduciary duties, documenting processes, meeting regularly and adhering to plan documents. Improta tells PLANADVISER many non-ERISA plans, such as those in the public higher education market, have adopted ERISA best practices.

As for fund consolidation, Improta says 403(b) plan sponsors can take baby steps. They can eliminate redundancies in their investment lineup, embrace open architecture and use funds not proprietary to their recordkeepers. Plan sponsors should look for quality investments and compare costs.

For plans with individual annuity contracts, Improta says some recordkeepers are encouraging plan sponsors to change contract terms and embrace group contracts. “Some may say it’s self-serving. By having an individual contract, a participant is promised a certain rate of return, but that doesn’t come without a cost,” she says. “Plan sponsors have to recognize legacy contracts exist, and if they adopt group contracts going forward, it’s only for dollars going forward.”

Improta suggests shutting down individual contracts to new assets. If the plan has money tied up in individual contracts, it will affect the fees the plan sponsor will be able to negotiate. “Moving to a group annuity will eventually fix the problem,” she says.

While these are ways to improve 403(b) plans and participant outcomes, still Rocaton suggests those who haven’t consolidated providers should consider doing so. “Those that have done a consolidation have made great accomplishments,” Improta contends.

“For plan sponsors that haven’t done this, they should be focused on improving participant outcomes,” she concludes.

Rocaton’s paper, “Overcoming Challenges in the 403(b) Tax Exempt Market,” is here.

«