Bill Beardsley Exits LPL Retirement Partners Business

At the end of the day there just aren’t all that many people working on retirement plans, so it is only natural that firms will compete for and trade talent.

Less than two months ago, Bill Beardsley sat down with PLANADVISER for a frank and wide-ranging discussion about the challenges and opportunities facing LPL Financial’s retirement plan-focused business lines.

Beardsley articulated a number of key questions with which the firm is grappling, including one that will be familiar to anyone working for a recordkeeper, DCIO asset manager or advisory shop: “How do we make servicing retirement plan participants and sponsors scalable and efficient while also supporting different types of advisers across our broader enterprise?”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

At a high level, Beardsley said LPL is looking to “create something that will not just be focused on a few hundred Retirement Partners advisers.” The leadership, Beardsley emphasized, wants to deliver something that is “deliverable across the enterprise and that leverages our scale.”

Late last week, however, word emerged that Beardsley has left the firm and will be replaced as head of the Retirement Partners business at LPL; he has reportedly accepted a new gig with Columbia Threadneedle Investments’ defined contribution investment only (DCIO) team, but that firm has not independently confirmed this information.

Though fairly short, Beardsley’s tenure at LPL came during a pivotal time for the retirement planning industry generally, and in particular for firms like LPL offering brokerage and advisory services together. When Beardsley joined LPL some five years ago, there were perhaps 300 advisers in the business who could be considered 401(k) plan experts. Since then, despite such headwinds as the DOL fiduciary rule and an increasingly litigious environment for plan sponsor clients, both the number of retirement specialists at LPL and the number working in the broader adviser marketplace have grown strongly. In the last year alone, the LPL Retirement Partners program has attracted some 200 new advisers, with 1,600 members now working on LPL’s “hybrid platform.” Nearly 1,000 other advisers support retirement plans on LPL’s corporate platform, and overall, more than 6,000 in LPL’s total adviser pool touch at least one retirement plan, many of them non-specialists using LPL’s Small Market Solution.

Naturally, given the size of the LPL operation, the entire team supporting retirement plans was not led alone by Beardsley. He was among a number of experienced leaders overseeing that area of the business.

A bit of inside baseball

Back in June, Beardsley either had little idea he would be exiting the business imminently, or he was careful not to give the impression that he was planning to leave. Instead, he happily outlined LPL’s vision for a recalibrated retirement plan business, and he seemed genuinely frustrated about what he referred to as unfair speculation by the competition that the firm’s decision to close the Worksite Financial Solutions program somehow signaled the registered investment adviser (RIA) and broker/dealer is turning wholesale away from retirement plan services.

Notably, that fated interview came exactly a year after Beardsley’s formal promotion to lead LPL Retirement Partners—a move coinciding with David Reich leaving the role—and since the firm announced plans to fundamentally reorganize the retirement-focused portion of its business.

LPL leadership at that point told PLANADVISER the internal changes would create “a new, unified strategy that aligns our teams supporting specialized clients, including retirement planning, high-net worth, insurance, and trust businesses.” Previously, LPL had structured these businesses in a way that delivered siloed support to advisers serving these niche markets. Moving forward, LPL said it would work to “unify these groups into one common entity that will provide sales and support to all our advisers and institutional clients.”

All indications are that this strategy will continue in Beardsley’s absence; no word yet on any replacement. 

July a Slow Trading Month for 401(k) Investors

There were no above-normal trading days in July, the first month this has happened since June 2017.

July was a particularly slow month for trading in 401(k) plans, with no days of above-normal trading activity, according to the Alight Solutions 401(k) Index. This was the first month of no days of above-normal trading activity since June 2017 and continues the lull in trading, with only one day of above-normal trading in both May and June.

Thirteen of 21 days favored fixed income, and, on average, 0.014% of balances were traded each day. Throughout the entire month, participants transferred a total of 0.15% of their balances. Year-to-date, they have transferred a total of 0.80% of their balances.

The number of days when participants transferred money into fixed income funds in July totaled 13, or 62% of the trades. Year-to-date, they have transferred money into fixed income funds on 80 days, representing 55% of the trades. The number of days when participants transferred money into equity funds totaled eight, or 38% of the trades. Year-to-date, they have transferred money into equity funds 66 days, representing 45% of the trades.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Inflows went primarily into stable value (53%), mid U.S. equity (22%) and money market funds (15%), with money coming out of company stock (27%), target-date funds (26%) and emerging markets funds (14%).

At the end of July, participants had an average of 68.9% of their portfolios invested in equities, up slightly from 68.5% in June. New contributions in July matched those in June, with 68.1% invested in equities.

The three top asset classes with the largest percentage of total balances were target-date funds (28%), large U.S. equity funds (25%) and stable value funds (10%). Asset classes with the most contributions in July were target-date funds (46%), large U.S. equity funds (20%) and international funds (8%).

Domestic and international equities had positive market returns in July, with both large U.S. equities and small U.S. equities up 1.7%. International equities were up 2.3% and U.S. bonds were virtually unchanged, with a 0.1% gain.

«